At Sun, 17 May 2020 21:46:39 +0100, Sad Clouds
wrote:
Subject: Re: NetBSD Jails
>
> Your main gripe about jails/zones/containers is added complexity, well
> guess what, with Xen/VMware/VirtualBox the complexity is still there,
> you just pushed it over to the hypervisor vendor.
Actually that's
On Sat, 16 May 2020, Aaron B. wrote:
> It also doesn't solve the ultimate issue here, which is isolation: a
> user (in the kernel sense of user, not necessary a human logged in via
> SSH) in one chroot could run 'ls' or equivalant syscalls and see
> activity inside a different chroot.
Assuming
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 09:51:42AM +0100, Sad Clouds wrote:
>
> Just look at how Solaris does it - it has Zones (aka Jails) and LDOMs
> (Logical Domains) on SPARC. LDOMs seem to be a much better way of
> partitioning OS instances versus something like VMware or Xen.
>
almost but not quite. A
At Sun, 17 May 2020 21:52:58 +0100, Sad Clouds
wrote:
Subject: Re: NetBSD Jails
>
> On Sun, 17 May 2020 14:07:21 -0500
> Ted Spradley wrote:
>
> > How well will all this modern container and virtualization stuff work
> > on the older platforms that only have megabytes of memory, not
> >
All,
this is a funny bit: On a machine that does not see windows clients
very often, I would like to run smbd and nmbd from inetd:
# Samba 4
netbios-ssn stream tcp nowait root/usr/pkg/sbin/smbd
smbd
microsoft-dsstream tcp nowait root/usr/pkg/sbin/smbd
