At Thu, 2 Jul 2020 22:27:49 + (GMT), r0ller wrote:
Subject: Re: does anyone have a working mozilla firefox-74.0 on 9.0 amd64?
>
> Mine works fine. However, my system is an upgraded one from 8.1 to 9.0
> if it makes a difference.
My system is a stock fresh 9.0/amd64 install, from the
Hi Greg,
Mine works fine. However, my system is an upgraded one from 8.1 to 9.0 if it
makes a difference. Then I installed firefox-74.0 and removed 68 (I guess that
was its version). On the first run it complained about libepoxy like in this
mail:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 05:34:11PM -0700, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> So, does anyone have a working mozilla firefox-74.0 on 9.0 amd64?
I haven't upgraded from NetBSD 8 to 9 and news on firefox just adds to my
inertia to upgrade.
Just curious. Which factors have led to firefox being such a mess:
-
At Thu, 2 Jul 2020 14:03:26 -0700 (PDT), Hisashi T Fujinaka
wrote:
Subject: Re: does anyone have a working mozilla firefox-74.0 on 9.0 amd64?
>
> OK, I don't know why this works, but I did "cat /dev/null >
> /etc/ld.so.conf" and it started right up.
>
Not for me, though maybe it didsimplify the
OK, I don't know why this works, but I did "cat /dev/null >
/etc/ld.so.conf" and it started right up.
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
Mine just crashes. I think there was a thread on this and you have to do
"something" to get it working. For the life of me I can't remember what
Mine just crashes. I think there was a thread on this and you have to do
"something" to get it working. For the life of me I can't remember what
that was.
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020, Greg A. Woods wrote:
So, does anyone have a working mozilla firefox-74.0 on 9.0 amd64?
I've been rebuilding another
Greetings,
I am using Xen and KVM guests with disks on LVM slices. Sometimes
one need to resize DOMU disk online and there are options:
1. On KVM you have to initiate a message to a domain via
virsh qemu-monitor-command. As far as I remember it works
for both linux and NetBSD.
2. Xen Linux DOMU
wo...@planix.com ("Greg A. Woods") writes:
>So, I should have mentioned that "umount -f nfs.server:/remotefs" does
>work (i.e. it does not hang waiting for the server to reconnect, and
>provided that there are no processes with cwd or open files on the
>remote filesystem, it can unmount the
