On Sun, 19 Dec 2021, Greg Troxel wrote:
I didn't mean to demand human acknowledgement, merely "not
rejected by the MTA, and actually delivred to the original
poster".
I am not as close a reader as I pride myself on being, since I
lept to the impression you have just now dispersed. Good
Bob Bernstein writes:
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2021, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
>> There's nothing wrong with a direct reply to a list message, and
>> it's discourteous to refuse them.
>
> Would it be correct to claim equivalence -- more or less --
> between your category "direct reply," and what I have
On Sun, 19 Dec 2021, Greg Troxel wrote:
There's nothing wrong with a direct reply to a list message,
and it's discourteous to refuse them.
Would it be correct to claim equivalence -- more or less --
between your category "direct reply," and what I have been
accustomed to call an "off-list
"Thomas Mueller" writes:
> I see the mistake, mueller6726 should have been mueller6725 .
>
> Moral of the story is that email to the list should not be CC'ed to the list
> subscriber.
Wrong moral. There's nothing wrong with a direct reply to a list
message, and it's discourteous to refuse
