It is entirely possible to build a full current or 10 release on 9. You
can then run either kernel with 9 userland.
To build, just "./build.sh release". The time you have to wait will be
less than the time to figure out how to avoid that. But you can build
tools, and then kernel, without
Hi,
Riccardo Mottola wrote:
I can do that very easily on the 9.3 kernel sources which I have
installed and the patch by Robert... because I have those sources
already setup up and ready ro rebuild.
I don't have the current kernel stuff here though.
answering to my self after private with
dposto...@yandex.ru (Dmitrii Postolov) writes:
>"clock: unknown CMOS layout"
The message says that no century information is found in the CMOS RAM,
the hardware clock itself seems to keep only 2 year digits. The century
is then deduced as 1900 if the year number is less than 70 and 2000
dposto...@yandex.ru (Dmitrii Postolov) writes:
>On boot of NetBSD-10.0_BETA the message "clock: unknown CMOS layout" is
>printed. There is no this message at boot on NetBSD-9.x.
It's a DIAGNOSTIC message, if you run NetBSD-9.x release, the kernel
is built without DIAGNOSTIC checks and messages,
On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 02:48:25PM +0500, Dmitrii Postolov wrote:
> Hi to All! Sorry for my bad English...
>
> $ uname -a
> NetBSD aspire9.localnet 10.0_BETA NetBSD-10.0_BETA (GENERIC) #0: Fri Dec 23
> 12:41:20 +05 2022
>
Hi to All! Sorry for my bad English...
$ uname -a
NetBSD aspire9.localnet 10.0_BETA NetBSD-10.0_BETA (GENERIC) #0: Fri Dec
23 12:41:20 +05 2022
root@aspire9.localnet:/root/sysbuild/amd64/obj/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC
amd64
On boot of NetBSD-10.0_BETA the message "clock: unknown
