On 1/12/23 11:18 AM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> On 1/11/2023 4:05 PM, Brad Spencer wrote:
> > Brook Milligan writes:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > I think the relevant bit is the end:
> > >
> > > FAILED Failed to start minitrd-switch-root.ser
On 1/11/2023 4:05 PM, Brad Spencer wrote:
> Brook Milligan writes:
>
> [snip]
>
> > I think the relevant bit is the end:
> >
> > FAILED Failed to start minitrd-switch-root.service - Switch Root.
> > See 'systemctl status initrd-switch-root.service' for details.
> >
> > Generating
On 1/11/2023 3:13 PM, Brook Milligan wrote:
> > On Jan 11, 2023, at 12:49 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> >
> > Did you try omitting type = 'pvh' to see if for some reason the Fedora
> > image does not like PVH mode? That would boot it in PV mode instead.
>
> Same t
On 1/11/2023 2:21 PM, Brook Milligan wrote:
> > On Jan 11, 2023, at 10:02 AM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> >
> > I'm glad to hear Debian install images are working now in Xen HVMs. Last
> > time I
> > tried it they would crash almost immediately after starting.
&
On 1/10/2023 6:52 PM, Brook Milligan wrote:
> > On Jan 10, 2023, at 1:16 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> >
> > I think vfb is only for PV guests, so try commenting out that line.
> >
> > For hvm, I recommend setting:
> > vga = 'stdvga'
> > videoram = '16'
On 1/10/2023 6:52 PM, Brook Milligan wrote:
> > On Jan 10, 2023, at 1:16 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> >
> > I think vfb is only for PV guests, so try commenting out that line.
> >
> > For hvm, I recommend setting:
> > vga = 'stdvga'
> > videoram = '16'
On 1/10/2023 1:36 PM, Brook Milligan wrote:
> > On Jan 9, 2023, at 1:07 PM, Brad Spencer wrote:
> >
> > It will depend on how you ultimately want to run the DOMU,
>
> For now, I’m just trying to get something to work.
>
> > This is a ArchLinux config using HVM:
> > kernel =
On 1/10/2023 1:36 PM, Brook Milligan wrote:
> > On Jan 9, 2023, at 1:07 PM, Brad Spencer wrote:
> >
> > It will depend on how you ultimately want to run the DOMU,
>
> For now, I’m just trying to get something to work.
>
> > This is a ArchLinux config using HVM:
> > kernel =
, 2018 at 04:15:51AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
Hello,
I think maybe some recent commits in external/cddl/osnet is breaking the
build of tools. After a recent checkout of current source, I get this while
building tools for m=amd64 and a=x86_64 starting with a clean object tree:
create libctf
On Wednesday, January 3, 2018, Christos Zoulas <chris...@astron.com> wrote:
> In article <5267d400-4a5e-e27f-906d-d2d6e048d...@gmail.com>,
> Chuck Zmudzinski <frchu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Today news of critical vulnerabilities (for example,
> >http://www.z
flaws in the hardware that NetBSD runs on. Can
anyone say if NetBSD is vulnerable?
Chuck Zmudzinski
On 9/22/2017 3:49 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
On Sep 21, 9:18pm, frchu...@gmail.com (Chuck Zmudzinski) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: IKEv2/IPsec VPN
| My results show that neither 8 nor current works for the case when the
| windows (or ios or android) L2TP/IPsec VPN client is not behind NAT
On 9/20/2017 8:48 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> On 9/20/2017 5:12 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> In article <e8da578e-c03b-7ae6-3062-b0da729dc...@gmail.com>,
>> Chuck Zmudzinski <frchu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I have used netbsd-6 and netbsd-7 with racoon to
On 9/20/2017 5:12 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
In article <e8da578e-c03b-7ae6-3062-b0da729dc...@gmail.com>,
Chuck Zmudzinski <frchu...@gmail.com> wrote:
I have used netbsd-6 and netbsd-7 with racoon to set up IKEv1/L2TP/IPsec
VPN with Windows clients. I have not tried IKE
be easier to do...
Good luck finding a solution for IKEv2. If you solve it, I would be
interested
to know how you got it working...
Chuck Zmudzinski
On 9/19/2017 5:49 PM, Gerard Lally wrote:
Some years ago I successfully set up netbsd-6 OpenVPN endpoints, with
20-30 remote Windows clients
On 5/7/2016 10:34 AM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
On 5/7/2016 9:37 AM, co...@sdf.org wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 10:42:29PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
Hello friends...
I have a system with ASROCK B85M Pro4 Board and Intel Core i5-4590S
processor which has Intel HD 4600 integrated graphics
On 5/7/2016 9:37 AM, co...@sdf.org wrote:
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 10:42:29PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
Hello friends...
I have a system with ASROCK B85M Pro4 Board and Intel Core i5-4590S
processor which has Intel HD 4600 integrated graphics. I thought I would try
booting NetBSD/amd64 7.0
Hello friends...
I have a system with ASROCK B85M Pro4 Board and Intel Core i5-4590S
processor which has Intel HD 4600 integrated graphics. I thought I would
try booting NetBSD/amd64 7.0 on it, since I read on the web that NetBSD
plans to support Intel integrated graphics up to Haswell in
18 matches
Mail list logo
