Hello,
I've seen that FreeBSD has the same issue :
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192490
"1. (Cause) rm -Rf is being run on a path and a subdirectory concurrently.
2. (Effect) rm -Rf is failing because fts_read isn't properly filtering
out certain errors like
Michael van Elst a écrit :
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:03:51AM +0100, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
Michael van Elst a écrit :
joel.bertr...@systella.fr (=?UTF-8?Q?BERTRAND_Jo=c3=abl?=) writes:
By dkctl wd0/1 setcache none save ? I will try next saturday. But if
both disks are unsynchronized,
Hello,
fsck on faulty fs returns :
legendre# fsck -f raid0e
** /dev/rraid0e
** File system is already clean
** Last Mounted on /usr
** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
UNALLOCATED I=5313299 OWNER=0 MODE=0
SIZE=0 MTIME=Jan 25 00:40 2016
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:03:51AM +0100, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
> Michael van Elst a écrit :
> >joel.bertr...@systella.fr (=?UTF-8?Q?BERTRAND_Jo=c3=abl?=) writes:
> >
> >>By dkctl wd0/1 setcache none save ? I will try next saturday. But if
> >>both disks are unsynchronized, how can I force a
BERTRAND Joël a écrit :
Thor Lancelot Simon a écrit :
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 05:15:09PM +0100, BERTRAND Jo??l wrote:
Thor Lancelot Simon a ?crit :
Ugh, ataraid.
If you skip the first 1MB or thereabouts, do the drives have exactly
the same contents?
I suppose you say that ataraid is
Michael van Elst a écrit :
joel.bertr...@systella.fr (=?UTF-8?Q?BERTRAND_Jo=c3=abl?=) writes:
I suspect your explanation is correct. System tries to write on ataraid
and write operation aborts as kernel panics. On next reboot, ataraid
doesn't resynchronize data.
If both components
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 04:23:32PM +0100, BERTRAND Jo??l wrote:
> Martin Husemann a ?crit :
> >>rld0 contains two disks (wd0 and wd1). Both are clean (smartctl
> >>doesn't return any error) and new.
> >
> >Can you please provide the full dmesg?
> >
> >Martin
> >
>
> Of course.
Ugh,
Thor Lancelot Simon a écrit :
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 04:23:32PM +0100, BERTRAND Jo??l wrote:
Martin Husemann a ?crit :
rld0 contains two disks (wd0 and wd1). Both are clean (smartctl
doesn't return any error) and new.
Can you please provide the full dmesg?
Martin
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 05:15:09PM +0100, BERTRAND Jo??l wrote:
> Thor Lancelot Simon a ?crit :
>
> >Ugh, ataraid.
> >
> >If you skip the first 1MB or thereabouts, do the drives have exactly
> >the same contents?
>
> I suppose you say that ataraid is not usable in production...
> I will try
Thor Lancelot Simon a écrit :
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 05:15:09PM +0100, BERTRAND Jo??l wrote:
Thor Lancelot Simon a ?crit :
Ugh, ataraid.
If you skip the first 1MB or thereabouts, do the drives have exactly
the same contents?
I suppose you say that ataraid is not usable in
10 matches
Mail list logo