Re: NetBSD base gcc & libatomic

2020-12-06 Thread Rhialto
On Sat 05 Dec 2020 at 22:36:58 +0100, Onno van der Linden wrote: > -march=i586 could/should work for i386 unless the real hardware is really old > or the emulation doesn't support it. Thanks, that worked. > Onno -Olaf. -- Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert -- rhialto at falu dot nl ___ Anyone who is capabl

Re: NetBSD base gcc & libatomic

2020-12-05 Thread Onno van der Linden
On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 09:03:30PM +0100, Rhialto wrote: > On Fri 04 Dec 2020 at 15:42:43 +0100, Riccardo Mottola wrote: > > on x86-32, I noticed our compiler emits calls to atomic functions, but > > does not ship libatomic, which is available only as an "addon" in pkgsrc. > > I think the base comp

Re: NetBSD base gcc & libatomic

2020-12-05 Thread Rhialto
On Fri 04 Dec 2020 at 15:42:43 +0100, Riccardo Mottola wrote: > on x86-32, I noticed our compiler emits calls to atomic functions, but > does not ship libatomic, which is available only as an "addon" in pkgsrc. > I think the base compiler should be consistent and either ship libraries > it uses or

NetBSD base gcc & libatomic

2020-12-04 Thread Riccardo Mottola
Hi, on x86-32, I noticed our compiler emits calls to atomic functions, but does not ship libatomic, which is available only as an "addon" in pkgsrc. I think the base compiler should be consistent and either ship libraries it uses or do not use. Gcc from pkgsrc then is free to pull libatomic in ins