A Journey Into BSD and Standards: BSD and POSIX
https://indico.bsdcan.org/event/1/contributions/26/
Yahoo Mail: Search, organise, conquer
On Fri, 10 May 2024 at 12:28 am, Liam Proven wrote: On
Thu, 2 May 2024 at 14:51, Hauke Fath (SPG) wrote:
>
> And there's the rub, right there.
>
>
On Thu, 2 May 2024 at 14:51, Hauke Fath (SPG) wrote:
>
> And there's the rub, right there.
>
> You want to tell other people ("developers") what they should spend
> their time on. And if you were ten times right, it wouldn't work that way.
Ahh yes. Excellent point.
> Do the leg work
On 2024-05-02 11:44, Liam Proven wrote:
This is not so much about the binaries about about the ABI for libc and
other core libs. But I suspec this works better than you think, if one
arranges for the other libs and deals with elf tags.
You are missing my point.
I am not asking "are they
https://archive.fosdem.org/2023/schedule/event/bsd_driver_harmony/attachments/slides/5976/export/events/attachments/bsd_driver_harmony/slides/5976/BSD_Driver_Harmony_FOSDEM.pdf
Talk from Last year
Yahoo Mail: Search, organise, conquer
On Thu, 2 May 2024 at 3:14 pm, Liam Proven wrote: On
On Wed, 1 May 2024 at 12:31, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> Liam Proven writes:
>
> > Step 1: a binary interoperability standard, so apps from any BSD can
> > execute on any other BSD (on the same CPU architecture, obviously.)
>
> This is not so much about the binaries about about the ABI for libc and
>
Liam Proven writes:
> Step 1: a binary interoperability standard, so apps from any BSD can
> execute on any other BSD (on the same CPU architecture, obviously.)
This is not so much about the binaries about about the ABI for libc and
other core libs. But I suspec this works better than you
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 21:38, Riccardo Mottola
wrote:
>
> Ciao Liam!
*Waves* :-)
>
> There is actually, but it is never easy. I have seen good transfer
> between NetBSD and OpenBSD in the years, including drivers and such.
I wonder if there might be some way to formalise it, without stepping
on
OpenBSD is NetBSD Lite
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024, 5:57 PM Riccardo Mottola
wrote:
> Ciao Liam!
>
> Liam Proven wrote:
> > I really wish there were more technology sharing between the BSDs.
>
> There is actually, but it is never easy. I have seen good transfer
> between NetBSD and OpenBSD in the
Ciao Liam!
Liam Proven wrote:
I really wish there were more technology sharing between the BSDs.
There is actually, but it is never easy. I have seen good transfer
between NetBSD and OpenBSD in the years, including drivers and such.
Dragonfly has the best installer, IMHO, but of course
On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 at 10:01, Riccardo Mottola
wrote:
>
> Hi Liam.
Ciao!
> Nice share and thanks for taking the time to write it.
Oh, thank you!
I really wish there were more technology sharing between the BSDs.
In the last ~2 years, I have tried Net, Open, Free, Dragonfly, Ghost,
Midnight,
Hi Liam.
Liam Proven wrote:
I thought this might interest folks here...
Nice share and thanks for taking the time to write it.
NetBSD 10 proves old tech can still kick apps and take names three decades later
Proper old-school Unix, not like those lazy, decadent Linux types
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 15:53:27 +
From: Taylor R Campbell
To: adr
Cc: netbsd-users@NetBSD.org, Liam Proven
Subject: Re: Please forgive a blatant plug: I reviewed v10 for the Reg
Hi adr,
Liam provided valuable feedback in both reviews
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024, Jonathan A. Kollasch wrote:
This all was uncalled for, and is not welcome in this community.
If you think that encouraging someone that wrote this:
https://www.theregister.com/2022/08/10/netbsd_93/
is ok, then I'm not interested in your opinion more that I'm in the
Hi adr,
Liam provided valuable feedback in both reviews, and if anything we
haven't put enough effort into smoothing out the rough edges Liam
pointed out, like figuring out why command-line editing and PATH
weren't set up right out of the box. There's always room for
improvement, and our
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 03:23:34PM +, adr wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2024, Liam Proven wrote:
~ ~
> > Comments and feedback welcomed!
>
> [...]The last time we looked at NetBSD, we checked out version 9.3[...]
>
> I remember reading that and not understanding how the person who
> wrote that
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024, Liam Proven wrote:
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 12:00:32 +0100
From: Liam Proven
To: Netbsd-Users-List
Subject: Please forgive a blatant plug: I reviewed v10 for the Reg
I thought this might interest folks here...
NetBSD 10 proves old tech can still kick apps and take names
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 14:21, Benny Siegert wrote:
>
> Wonderful article, thanks for sharing! :D
Oh thank you! Thank you too for your help in inspiring it – and
putting me in touch with Martin.
--
Liam Proven ~ Profile: https://about.me/liamproven
Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk ~ gMail/gTalk/FB:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 3:01 AM Liam Proven wrote:
> I thought this might interest folks here...
>
> NetBSD 10 proves old tech can still kick apps and take names three decades
> later
>
> Proper old-school Unix, not like those lazy, decadent Linux types
>
>
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 1:01 PM Liam Proven wrote:
> NetBSD 10 proves old tech can still kick apps and take names three decades
> later
>
> Proper old-school Unix, not like those lazy, decadent Linux types
>
> https://www.theregister.com/2024/04/17/30yo_netbsd_releases_v10/
>
> Comments and
I thought this might interest folks here...
NetBSD 10 proves old tech can still kick apps and take names three decades later
Proper old-school Unix, not like those lazy, decadent Linux types
https://www.theregister.com/2024/04/17/30yo_netbsd_releases_v10/
Comments and feedback welcomed!
--
20 matches
Mail list logo
