Re: 9.1 panic in ccb/iscsi

2021-06-12 Thread Michael van Elst
ci4...@gmail.com (Chavdar Ivanov) writes: >> istgt is the iSCSI server. >> The crash is about the in-kernel iscsi initiator. >The first sentence in the first message in the thread says 'I can see >some panics on a server that exports iSCSI volumes (istgt on >a CCB device' (CCB later corrected as

Re: 9.1 panic in ccb/iscsi

2021-06-12 Thread Chavdar Ivanov
Thanks! I didn't realise it is both a target and an initiator. Apart from a few tests years ago, I don't remember using the in-kernel iSCSI target (which was flaky for me at the time - the initiators who were using it didn't reattach after a reboot). As far as the initiator, I've only tried it

Re: 9.1 panic in ccb/iscsi

2021-06-12 Thread BERTRAND Joël
Chavdar Ivanov a écrit : > On Sat, 12 Jun 2021 at 19:30, Michael van Elst wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 05:02:11PM +0100, Chavdar Ivanov wrote: >> >>> Not that this has any connection to your problem, but I'd nevertheless >>> add my 5c about istgt - I have been serving zvols for perhaps

Re: 9.1 panic in ccb/iscsi

2021-06-12 Thread Chavdar Ivanov
On Sat, 12 Jun 2021 at 19:30, Michael van Elst wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 05:02:11PM +0100, Chavdar Ivanov wrote: > > > Not that this has any connection to your problem, but I'd nevertheless > > add my 5c about istgt - I have been serving zvols for perhaps one year > > now under -current

Re: 9.1 panic in ccb/iscsi

2021-06-12 Thread Michael van Elst
On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 05:02:11PM +0100, Chavdar Ivanov wrote: > Not that this has any connection to your problem, but I'd nevertheless > add my 5c about istgt - I have been serving zvols for perhaps one year > now under -current without any problems. istgt is the iSCSI server. The crash is

Re: 9.1 panic in ccb/iscsi

2021-06-12 Thread Chavdar Ivanov
On Sat, 12 Jun 2021 at 14:19, BERTRAND Joël wrote: > > Michael van Elst a écrit : > > joel.bertr...@systella.fr (=?UTF-8?Q?BERTRAND_Jo=c3=abl?=) writes: > > > >>> If you have a version of the kernel with debug symbols, you could > >>> use addr2line to identify the instruction that caused the

Re: 9.1 panic in ccb/iscsi

2021-06-12 Thread BERTRAND Joël
Michael van Elst a écrit : > joel.bertr...@systella.fr (=?UTF-8?Q?BERTRAND_Jo=c3=abl?=) writes: > >>> If you have a version of the kernel with debug symbols, you could >>> use addr2line to identify the instruction that caused the uvm_fault >>> at address 0x802280cc. Without debug symbols

Re: 9.1 panic in ccb/iscsi

2021-06-12 Thread Michael van Elst
joel.bertr...@systella.fr (=?UTF-8?Q?BERTRAND_Jo=c3=abl?=) writes: >> If you have a version of the kernel with debug symbols, you could >> use addr2line to identify the instruction that caused the uvm_fault >> at address 0x802280cc. Without debug symbols it is not >> that easy. > I

Re: 9.1 panic in ccb/iscsi

2021-06-12 Thread BERTRAND Joël
Michael van Elst a écrit : > joel.bertr...@systella.fr (=?UTF-8?Q?BERTRAND_Jo=c3=abl?=) writes: > >> Hello, > >> I can see some panics on a server that exports iSCSI volumes (istgt on >> a CCB device) to some workstations. dmesg always contains this kind of >> backtrace : > > That

Re: 9.1 panic in ccb/iscsi

2021-06-12 Thread Michael van Elst
joel.bertr...@systella.fr (=?UTF-8?Q?BERTRAND_Jo=c3=abl?=) writes: > Hello, > I can see some panics on a server that exports iSCSI volumes (istgt on >a CCB device) to some workstations. dmesg always contains this kind of >backtrace : That would be on the workstation that uses the