On Thu, 1 Dec 2022, Mayuresh wrote:
Something like this boots:
set root=(hd0,gpt1)
knetbsd /netbsd --root=dk5
boot
But it says
error: no suitable video mode found
Booting in blind mode
I don't usually boot NetBSD via grub, but, this worked:
---
$ cat
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 11:26:09PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
Some more details of what various installation options lead to:
1. By choosing Available disks as "wd0" -> Use existing GPT partitions
This leads to error
/sbin/mount -tmsdos /dev/dk1 /targetrootSYSTEM
mount: realpath
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 06:50:41PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 11:13:07PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> > But it says
> >
> > error: no suitable video mode found
> > Booting in blind mode
>
> That is a message from grub, not from any part of NetBSD.
Yes, but
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 11:13:07PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> But it says
>
> error: no suitable video mode found
> Booting in blind mode
That is a message from grub, not from any part of NetBSD.
Martin
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 11:00:24PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> Any pointers would be of great help.
Something like this boots:
set root=(hd0,gpt1)
knetbsd /netbsd --root=dk5
boot
But it says
error: no suitable video mode found
Booting in blind mode
Please advise.
--
Mayuresh
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 03:25:25PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> Better use a 9.3_STABLE version from
> https://nycdn.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-daily/netbsd-9/latest/
I am trying:
https://nycdn.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-daily/netbsd-9/202211301400Z/images/NetBSD-9.3_STABLE-amd64-install.img.gz
The
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 07:31:21PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> How about using sysinst installer from current and installing sets from
> 9.3 distribution? Is this something workable?
Better use a 9.3_STABLE version from
https://nycdn.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-daily/netbsd-9/latest/
This has all the
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 09:42:40PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> On installation image I also notice /sysinst.core. So may be the installer
> did not do some things.
How about using sysinst installer from current and installing sets from
9.3 distribution? Is this something workable?
--
Mayuresh
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 09:38:48PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> Since there are 3 OSes and the paths are not indicative I wonder which one
> is which and is one of them installed by NetBSD.
On NetBSD installation image I see this file with size 223912. So above
files (mentioned in my last post) were
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 04:52:05PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> The NetBSD bootloader (bootx64.efi) should have been copied to
> EFI/BOOT/ in the ESP, but no UEFI variables will be created.
I can see 2 files by that name:
/EFI/Boot/BOOTX64.EFI of size 546446
/EFI/EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI of size
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 09:17:22PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> /dev/sda1 is EFI partition. There is Windows on /dev/sda3 and Linux on
> /dev/sda6.
>
> NetBSD is on what appears as /dev/sda8 here (ignore its type above, above
> is a snapshot before NetBSD was installed). It appeared as /dev/dk7 with
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 04:36:19PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> Do you have other partitions on that disk or did you select a full disk for
> NetBSD type of installation?
This is taken from Linux:
Disk /dev/sda: 931.51 GiB, 1000204886016 bytes, 1953525168 sectors
Disk model: TOSHIBA
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 08:59:36PM +0530, Mayuresh wrote:
> I don't find uefi image for NetBSD 9.3 amd64 I assume the release image is
> already the integrated one.
Yes, there is a common image now that should work on all "newer" machines
in either BIOS or UEFI boot mode.
> I did the
13 matches
Mail list logo
