Hi Martin,
HammerFS2 has improved a lot check these
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=DragonFlyBSD-5.4.1-HAMMER2
Regards,
Jay
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019, 1:11 PM Martin Husemann On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 01:07:59PM +0530, Jay Patel wrote:
> > better option is HammerFS from
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 01:07:59PM +0530, Jay Patel wrote:
> better option is HammerFS from DragonflyBSD but may be in future i guess
Is that usable nowadays? I had very bad experiences in its early time when
I once installed a test DragonFly system to check some firefox issue.
Any performance
better option is HammerFS from DragonflyBSD but may be in future i guess
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 3:43 PM wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since FreeBSD recently announced to move to using ZFSonLinux as their
> upstream source
> for ZFS (
>
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 13:16, Gua Chung Lim wrote:
>
> * n...@n0.is (n...@n0.is) wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > since FreeBSD recently announced to move to using ZFSonLinux as their
> > upstream source
> > for ZFS
> > (https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2018-December/072422.html),
> >
* n...@n0.is (n...@n0.is) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since FreeBSD recently announced to move to using ZFSonLinux as their
> upstream source
> for ZFS
> (https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2018-December/072422.html),
> what has been the development of ZFS in NetBSD so far? Did you use
Hi,
since FreeBSD recently announced to move to using ZFSonLinux as their upstream
source
for ZFS
(https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2018-December/072422.html),
what has been the development of ZFS in NetBSD so far? Did you use the same
sources?
Regardless of the answer, is
