Date:Sat, 15 Apr 2017 20:24:45 -0700
From:John Nemeth
Message-ID: <201704160324.v3g3ojwt018...@server.cornerstoneservice.ca>
| There are issues with IP_PKTINFO on NetBSD, see 48166 and 48280.
The missing field (48166) doesn't bother me (I did see it exists on
On Apr 15, 8:14pm, jnem...@cue.bc.ca (John Nemeth) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: bind reacts badly to dhcpcd losing/regaining connectivity
| } It is a weak copyleft license. It creates problems for us because
| } it will require a lot more work to import, and cause more issues
| } for redistribution
On Apr 16, 6:48am, k...@munnari.oz.au (Robert Elz) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: bind reacts badly to dhcpcd losing/regaining connectivity
| Date:Sat, 15 Apr 2017 22:16:43 + (UTC)
| From:chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas)
| Message-ID:
|
| | > How is t
On Apr 16, 8:23am, Robert Elz wrote:
}
} | I suspect the IP_RECVDSTADDR setsockopt()
}
} Actually, more probably IP_PKTINFO as that's the one named uses for IPv6.
} Either would do for the purpose of determining the incoming address of a
} UDP datagram, so the reply can be sent from the correc
On Apr 15, 10:16pm, Christos Zoulas wrote:
} In article <201704152047.v3fklaxz010...@server.cornerstoneservice.ca>,
} John Nemeth wrote:
} >
} > What's wrong with the MPL?
}
} It is a weak copyleft license. It creates problems for us because
} it will require a lot more work to import, and c
Date:Sun, 16 Apr 2017 06:48:28 +0700
From:Robert Elz
Message-ID: <17026.1492300...@andromeda.noi.kre.to>
| I suspect the IP_RECVDSTADDR setsockopt()
Actually, more probably IP_PKTINFO as that's the one named uses for IPv6.
Either would do for the purpose of determi
Date:Sat, 15 Apr 2017 22:16:43 + (UTC)
From:chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas)
Message-ID:
| > How is this done in NetBSD?
|
| bind to INADDR_ANY
I assume that what jnemeth was really asling, was how to make it work
the way bind requires, and I susp
In article <201704152047.v3fklaxz010...@server.cornerstoneservice.ca>,
John Nemeth wrote:
>
> What's wrong with the MPL?
It is a weak copyleft license. It creates problems for us because
it will require a lot more work to import, and cause more issues
for redistribution.
>} to add an option
On Apr 15, 9:09am, Christos Zoulas wrote:
} On Apr 15, 5:29pm, k...@munnari.oz.au (Robert Elz) wrote:
}
} | ps: Christos - capabilities (if we had them) would not be the answer - if
you
} | were to trust bind to be unhackable, then just using root would be just as
} | good a solution, if you (w
On Apr 15, 5:29pm, k...@munnari.oz.au (Robert Elz) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: bind reacts badly to dhcpcd losing/regaining connectivity
| ps: Christos - capabilities (if we had them) would not be the answer - if you
| were to trust bind to be unhackable, then just using root would be just as
| good
Date:Sat, 15 Apr 2017 10:57:08 +0200
From:Rhialto
Message-ID: <20170415085708.gb17...@falu.nl>
| Ah, that is probably why the following attempt did not cause bind to
| open a wildcard socket:
|
| listen-on-v6 { any; }; /* I had this one already */
|
On Sat 15 Apr 2017 at 13:55:08 +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> Changing the bind() call is easy, fixing all the places it is assumed to
> work the way it now does is harder.
Ah, that is probably why the following attempt did not cause bind to
open a wildcard socket:
listen-on-v6 { any; }; /*
Date:Sat, 15 Apr 2017 03:06:13 + (UTC)
From:chris...@astron.com (Christos Zoulas)
Message-ID:
| Or capabilities, or wildcard bind.
That is what I meant by ...
| >or to recode the
| >receive code to use the new way to receive the dest addr of incoming
| >
In article <4355.1492217...@andromeda.noi.kre.to>,
Robert Elz wrote:
>Date:Sat, 15 Apr 2017 01:41:17 +0200
>From:Rhialto
>Message-ID: <20170414234117.ga18...@falu.nl>
>
>
> | Why does named not succeed in using the interface when it gets an
> | address again? What
In article <20170415005323.ga17...@falu.nl>, Rhialto wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>On Fri 14 Apr 2017 at 19:20:13 -0500, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
>> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017, Rhialto wrote:
>>
>> > and these errors about re1 (my external interface) kept going all the
>> > time. When I noticed them and restarte
Date:Sat, 15 Apr 2017 02:53:23 +0200
From:Rhialto
Message-ID: <20170415005323.ga17...@falu.nl>
| I also noticed the error seems to mention IPv4 only. I am not sure if it
| managed to bind an IPv6 address on the same interface (and now it is too
| late, unfortuna
Date:Sat, 15 Apr 2017 01:41:17 +0200
From:Rhialto
Message-ID: <20170414234117.ga18...@falu.nl>
| Why does named not succeed in using the interface when it gets an
| address again? What to do about it? I noticed partly because my dns data
| seemed to have droppe
On Fri 14 Apr 2017 at 19:20:13 -0500, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Apr 2017, Rhialto wrote:
>
> > and these errors about re1 (my external interface) kept going all the
> > time. When I noticed them and restarted named, they went away.
> >
> > Why does named not succeed in using the interfac
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017, Rhialto wrote:
> and these errors about re1 (my external interface) kept going all the
> time. When I noticed them and restarted named, they went away.
>
> Why does named not succeed in using the interface when it gets an
> address again? What to do about it? I noticed partly
About 8 days ago, my ADSL modem lost connection to the world for a bit,
and then regained it. dhcpcd (6.11.3 from pkgsrc) all the while
furiously re-tried to regain a lease, but when it did, named (from
NetBSD 7.0.1) was broken:
Apr 7 13:39:47 murthe dhcpcd[5396]: re1: DHCPv6 REPLY: no internet c
20 matches
Mail list logo
