Re: changed major shlib versions in netbsd-9

2024-03-27 Thread Martin Husemann
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 06:06:42PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: > So: > > - this was thought about and believed within the rules > - I should just delete the destdir and continue > - we believe that I will then have no problems Yes! (If this would cause problems, you had them before but subte

Re: changed major shlib versions in netbsd-9

2024-03-26 Thread Greg Troxel
Martin Husemann writes: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 03:46:21PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: >> Or, do we claim that these libs are private to bind, and thus this is >> not an ABI change? > > We do, but it is phishy. There was a recent discussion to move it to > some more private directory like /usr/li

Re: changed major shlib versions in netbsd-9

2024-03-26 Thread Martin Husemann
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 03:46:21PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: > Or, do we claim that these libs are private to bind, and thus this is > not an ABI change? We do, but it is phishy. There was a recent discussion to move it to some more private directory like /usr/lib/bind/lib*.so (especially to avoid

changed major shlib versions in netbsd-9

2024-03-26 Thread Greg Troxel
Perhaps my build is messed up, but I just updated along netbsd-9 and netbsd-10 and rebuilt. On -10, I got new shlib versions for bind and unbound libs. That's ok because 10 is not yet released. On -9, I see in my destdir: -r--r--r-- 1 gdt wheel 143494 Mar 26 12:59 /usr/obj/gdt-9/destdir/a