On 25/02/16 19:40, Jukka Marin wrote:
> I'm setting up a new gateway machine (NetBSD 7.0). My old gateway is based
> on NetBSD 6.0 and pf. Can I use pf on NetBSD 7.0 or should I move to npf?
> Why?
My router panics (in pf) from time to time (NetBSD/amd64 6.1.x).
Also, I run miniupnpd
Hi,
I want to set up an IPSEC client to connect to my office's Lancom router. I
was provided with the following details:
- Main mode IKEv1
- DH group 2 (1024 bit)
- PFS group 2 (1024 bit)
- phase 1: IKE AES128, MD5
- phase 2: IPSec AES128, MD5
- phase 2 tunnel mode ESP
- remote network
Yes, I tried with default xorg.conf and startx but it error again.
BTW, I try with nouveau but still this error show me again.
Maybe, I must download and install the current version of NetBSD to resolve
this problem.
Thanks so much.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:51 PM, wrote:
> On
Dear List,
I'm setting up a new gateway machine (NetBSD 7.0). My old gateway is based
on NetBSD 6.0 and pf. Can I use pf on NetBSD 7.0 or should I move to npf?
Why?
I have found more examples and manuals for pf, and moving to npf seems like
extra work. With pf, I could also copy my config
On 25.02.16 18:52:52 I wrote:
> and the VPN connection
> # racoonctl vc 1.2.3.4
>
> ...it fails very early:
>
> [...]
> Feb 25 17:24:08 arwen racoon: INFO: begin Identity Protection mode.
> Feb 25 17:24:59 arwen racoon: ERROR: phase1 negotiation failed due to
> time up.
On Feb 25, 8:40pm, Jukka Marin wrote:
}
} I'm setting up a new gateway machine (NetBSD 7.0). My old gateway is based
} on NetBSD 6.0 and pf. Can I use pf on NetBSD 7.0 or should I move to npf?
} Why?
You could certainly use pf with NetBSD 7.0. However, I would
have to point out that the
you should move to npf. it is the firewall supported by NetBSD and it works.
> Am 25.02.2016 um 19:40 schrieb Jukka Marin :
>
> Dear List,
>
> I'm setting up a new gateway machine (NetBSD 7.0). My old gateway is based
> on NetBSD 6.0 and pf. Can I use pf on NetBSD 7.0
Hello,is it possible to change /emul/linux path ? I downloaded by myself Arch
Linux operating system and I put it in my home directory (~/Linux) and I wish
to be able to use binaries from there. The fact is that if I move Arch Linux
root to /emul/linux/, I can use binaries but if I move it
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:37:00PM +0330, Mohammad BadieZadegan wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have Dell E6410 Latitude notebook (With nVidia Graphic card) and I
> installed NetBSD v7.0 as a main OS on it.
> While I run [X -configure] it make a [xorg.conf.new] and then I run [X
> -config
Hi all,
I have Dell E6410 Latitude notebook (With nVidia Graphic card) and I
installed NetBSD v7.0 as a main OS on it.
While I run [X -configure] it make a [xorg.conf.new] and then I run [X
-config /root/xorg.conf.new] but it errored me: [(EE) No device Detected].
Finally I changed "nv" in
On February 24, 2016 6:11:36 PM EST, Swift Griggs wrote:
>
>When a Linux-binary runs, what does it "see" in terms of the root file
>system? So, for example, if I run 'ldconfig', does it see Linux
>libraries
>in /emul/linux/lib or just "/lib" ?
>
>Also, how does this play
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 07:31:35PM +0100, Jose Luis Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:17 AM, Eric Haszlakiewicz wrote:
> > On 2/1/2016 3:51 PM, Jose Luis Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
>
>
> > Have you tried downloading a newer version of the client from Citrix's
Why don´t you just use the Receiver for HTML5? With regard to your
crash, do you have a backtrace handy?
2016-02-25 14:03 GMT+01:00 Patrick Welche :
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 07:31:35PM +0100, Jose Luis Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:17 AM, Eric Haszlakiewicz
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 02:44:32PM +0100, Stephan wrote:
> Why don´t you just use the Receiver for HTML5? With regard to your
> crash, do you have a backtrace handy?
Have a look at Jose's from earlier in this thread:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2016/02/03/msg017788.html
P
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Frank Wille wrote:
> Seems I forgot IPSEC_DEBUG, so I missed important information? I tried it
> again with a 7.0 kernel and IPSEC_DEBUG on my PowerBook and the cause
> turned out to be a bad "authentication_method" in my propsal:
>
> Feb 25
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, John Nemeth wrote:
You didn't ask, but I'll add that the third option is ipfilter. It sits
somewhere in the middle. It hasn't seen a lot of maintenance or
enhancement lately, but it is still much newer then pf.
Just FYI, the last version was 4.1.33 and was released
In Message ,
Adrien Fernandes wrote:
=>Hello,is it possible to change /emul/linux path ? I downloaded
=>by myself Arch Linux operating system and I put it in my home
=>directory (~/Linux) and I wish to be able to use
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:37:00PM +0330, Mohammad BadieZadegan wrote:
> I have Dell E6410 Latitude notebook (With nVidia Graphic card) and I
> installed NetBSD v7.0 as a main OS on it.
> While I run [X -configure] it make a [xorg.conf.new] and then I run [X
> -config /root/xorg.conf.new] but it
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:12:55AM +0330, Mohammad BadieZadegan wrote:
> Thanks for your Helps,
> I downloaded
> *http://nyftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-daily/HEAD/201602241810Z/images/NetBSD-7.99.26-amd64-install.img.gz
>
19 matches
Mail list logo