Poor network performances

Hi, I've been witnessing poor performances while using NetBSD 7.0/amd64 on a Gigabit network. I tried this with 2 differents NICs. Default scenario, either re(4) or alc(4): $ ifconfig re0 # relevant bits re0: flags=8843 mtu 1500

Re: Poor network performances

On Fri, 30 Sep 2016, Emile `iMil' Heitor wrote: I tried tweaking sysctl a bit like indicated here: https://wiki.netbsd.org/tutorials/tuning_netbsd_for_performance/ I found these values to help a lot: http://proj.sunet.se/E2E/netbsd.txt from http://proj.sunet.se/E2E/tcptune.html

bozohttpd support for SNI

Hello! Does bozohttpd in NetBSD (7 or current) support SNI (Server Name Identification) such that multiple SSL sites can be served from one HTTPS server? If not, what is NetBSD's position on the feature: is it "we're open to accepting a quality patch," or is it more "we'd rather not add the

Re: bozohttpd support for SNI

Personally, I'd love to have support for SNI (and multiple -Z paths per site too) - I'd use it daily. In fact, I was just bemoaning that fact yesterday, but am not best-placed to do anything about it right now (yes, I suck :() Best, Alistair On 30 September 2016 at 13:37, J. Lewis Muir

Re: bozohttpd support for SNI

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Alistair Crooks wrote: > Personally, I'd love to have support for SNI (and multiple -Z paths > per site too) - I'd use it daily. > > In fact, I was just bemoaning that fact yesterday, but am not > best-placed to do anything about it right now

Re: bozohttpd support for SNI

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 04:45:10PM -0400, matthew sporleder wrote: > > bozo is growing features pretty quickly as netbsd keeps trying to use it to > do actual stuff(tm). :) I'd prefer to see a lot of the complex functionality in bozo split out into helper programs. This feature, in particular,