Re: vioif(4) ipv6 issues?

2017-09-20 Thread Greg Troxel
Jeff Rizzo writes: > I just noticed that a host of mine running as a Xen guest is not > getting (or maybe just sending) ipv6 packets correctly. It's running > pretty much the same as some physical hosts, and the only difference I > can see is the Xen (and vioif) aspect. Are you using a bridge

Re: IKEv2/IPsec VPN

2017-09-20 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article <1505857797.1933676.680920.129e4...@webmail.messagingengine.com>, Gerard Lally wrote: >Some years ago I successfully set up netbsd-6 OpenVPN endpoints, with >20-30 remote Windows clients connecting. > >I'd now like to set up a netbsd-8 VPN, based on IKEv2/IPsec. The >documentation

Re: IKEv2/IPsec VPN

2017-09-20 Thread Chuck Zmudzinski
I have used netbsd-6 and netbsd-7 with racoon to set up IKEv1/L2TP/IPsec VPN with Windows clients. I have not tried IKEv2 and based on the little research I have done I don't think it is possible using an out of the box NetBSD/pkgsrc configuration. Even for IKEv1 I needed to hack the NetBSD kernel

Re: IKEv2/IPsec VPN

2017-09-20 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article , Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: >I have used netbsd-6 and netbsd-7 with racoon to set up IKEv1/L2TP/IPsec >VPN with Windows clients. I have not tried IKEv2 and based on the little >research I have done I don't think it is possible using an out of the box >NetBSD/pkgsrc configuration. Even fo

Re: IKEv2/IPsec VPN

2017-09-20 Thread Chuck Zmudzinski
On 9/20/2017 5:12 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote: In article , Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: I have used netbsd-6 and netbsd-7 with racoon to set up IKEv1/L2TP/IPsec VPN with Windows clients. I have not tried IKEv2 and based on the little research I have done I don't think it is possible using an out of