Re: NPF syntax

2015-03-17 Thread rudolf
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 20:37:16 +0100 rudolf net...@eq.cz wrote: Are you using an older version of NPF? This seems like 3) in this email from two years ago: https://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2013/04/13/msg012733.html I am running NetBSD 6.1.5_PATCH. I guess that

Re: net.inet.tcp.tso=0

2015-03-17 Thread Brad Spencer
yea=E2=80=A6 that's what thought=E2=80=A6 i did read all the man pages i could find on any bsd for the ipf tools and none mentions anything about being able to block more than one range at a time - like macros or lists or tables, etc. according to ipdeny.com china has about 5300

Re: NPF syntax

2015-03-17 Thread Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
D'Arcy J.M. Cain da...@netbsd.org wrote: I have decided to give up on pf after banging my head against the wall (and the OBSD mailing list) and try npf but I can't figure out the syntax. I followed the example at http://www.netbsd.org/~rmind/npf/ but I keep getting errors when I validate. I

Re: NPF syntax

2015-03-17 Thread D'Arcy J.M. Cain
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 20:37:16 +0100 rudolf net...@eq.cz wrote: Are you using an older version of NPF? This seems like 3) in this email from two years ago: https://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2013/04/13/msg012733.html I am running NetBSD 6.1.5_PATCH. I guess that doesn't have the most