On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:38:38 +0200
Frank Wille wrote:
> Greg Oster wrote:
>
> >> And wouldn't it be nice to fix RAIDframe, so that a
> >> previous /dev/raid1 is automatically configured as /dev/raid0
> >> again, when raid0 does not exist in the system? Or doesn't that
> >>
Robert Elz wrote:
> In this case, rather than finding two different raid0's, and "fixing"
> things by changing one of them (in this case, unfortunately it seems,
> the "wrong" one) to raid1, a better solution would have been to just
> blather on the console about the problem, and refuse to
Hi,
these days I have set up a Synology DS209j with a RAID-1 kernelized RAIDframe,
using the components /dev/wd0a and /dev/wd1a.
All worked well, so I started to test some failure scenarios.
Disconnecting wd0 was fine and the system boots from wd1a with "component0
failed".
Then I replaced wd0
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Ottavio Caruso
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I used to dual boot Windows 7 and NetBSD.
>
> This is my fdisk:
>
>
> Disk: /dev/rwd0d
> NetBSD disklabel disk geometry:
> cylinders: 155061, heads: 16, sectors/track: 63 (1008 sectors/cylinder)
>
> Hello,
>
> I used to dual boot Windows 7 and NetBSD.
...
> Now the usb drive is unbootable, therefore I can only access NetBSD.
I have no idea if it is related, but at least on both of my Netbsd
7 systems, both amd64 and i386, installboot appears to destroy the
bootblock on at least the usb
Now that pkgsrc-wip has been moved to a git repository, how does a user who
already has pkgsrc-wip by cvs update?
I checked the URL, http://pkgsrc.org/wip/ , and this was not discussed.
Or does the user just delete or move the cvs repository and git clone, fresh
start?
Tom
"Thomas Mueller" writes:
> Now that pkgsrc-wip has been moved to a git repository, how does a user who
> already has pkgsrc-wip by cvs update?
>
> I checked the URL, http://pkgsrc.org/wip/ , and this was not discussed.
>
> Or does the user just delete or move the cvs
Date:Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:07:32 -0600
From:Greg Oster
Message-ID: <20150930090732.14371...@mickey.usask.ca>
| I agree that it'd be nice to have an IOCTL for raidctl to change which
| device a RAID set will show up as on next reboot... It's not
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 15:11:35 +0200
Frank Wille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> these days I have set up a Synology DS209j with a RAID-1 kernelized
> RAIDframe, using the components /dev/wd0a and /dev/wd1a.
>
> All worked well, so I started to test some failure scenarios.
>
>
Greg Oster wrote:
>> And wouldn't it be nice to fix RAIDframe, so that a
>> previous /dev/raid1 is automatically configured as /dev/raid0 again,
>> when raid0 does not exist in the system? Or doesn't that make sense
>> for some reason?
>
> Imagine a system where /dev/raid0a is /, /dev/raid1e is
10 matches
Mail list logo