* jmitchel (jmitc...@mail.bigjar.com) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have an appliance that I'm upgrading from 1.6.2 (I know, I know) to 6.1.5.
> The appliance currently only has the root account. I want users to be able
> to set up the box without having to use a serial cable, so I'm configuring
> it
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
>
> That's irresponsible. I for one won't help you do it. Use SSH.
Agreed.
It's amazing how telnet still exists and even proliferates when it
doesn't have to.
Probably it should be requisite to explain why telnet is
Andy Ruhl wrote:
A guy I worked with a while back insisted on using it because Windows
doesn't have a built in SSH client. Even after someone sniffed his
password and showed him. Unbelievable.
Wow is he living in the past. Windows doesn't have a telnet client
either in recent versions and
Mike Pumford (mpumf...@mudcovered.org.uk) writes...
>Wow is he living in the past. Windows doesn't have a telnet client
>either in recent versions and quite frankly I'd rather download PuTTY
>anyway. ;)
>
>
>Mike
Actually, a telnet client is available in newer versions of Windows as a
feature
Is there a sysctl or some such thing to make a particular driver less
"chatty"?
I have a twa card with a battery that needs replacing and it won't shut
up about it. I'd like to turn off the messages for this driver until I
can do maintenance and get the replacement in place. These are the
Davis, Michael T. wrote:
Actually, a telnet client is available in newer versions of Windows
as a feature that can be enabled via the "Programs and Features"
control panel. It is not enabled, by default. But I prefer PuTTY,
as well.
Well I've learnt something today :). Didn't realise that