Re: texlive xelatex not working [ Was fontconfig : .so.2 not provided by 2.11.1?]

On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 13:40:26 Brook Milligan wrote: > Is there are more or less automated way to make TeX packages? I know from > having made some that there is a lot of boilerplate. That suggests that > some tool to make these packages might make it easier to get and maintain a > complete set.

Re: texlive xelatex not working [ Was fontconfig : .so.2 not provided by 2.11.1?]

On Sat 23 Jan 2016 at 09:51:28 +1300, Mark Davies wrote: > I do have a script that takes a texlive package and creates a (first > cut at a) pkgsrc package for it. I really should clean it up and > commit it to pkgtools. Would it be possible to generate packages on-the-fly in such a way that the

Re: texlive xelatex not working [ Was fontconfig : .so.2 not provided by 2.11.1?]

On Jan 22, 2016, at 12:55 PM, Mark Davies wrote: > If there are particular texlive packages that are currently missing that > someone wants, let me know and I'll add them. Is there are more or less automated way to make TeX packages? I know from having made some that there

Re: texlive xelatex not working [ Was fontconfig : .so.2 not provided by 2.11.1?]

On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 12:40:09 Jeremy C. Reed wrote: > I don't know answer if full TeX Live distrubution is available in > pkgsrc, [...] > Maybe someone can help you get the needed parts installed without > having the full texlive. The current state is that any TeX packages we have are up-to-date

Re: texlive xelatex not working [ Was fontconfig : .so.2 not provided by 2.11.1?]

I may have missed something in the previous thread or in this thread... but what feature are you missing? I don't know answer if full TeX Live distrubution is available in pkgsrc, but I use the pkgsrc for my LaTeX related work every week for over a decade. I have generated many documents

Re: texlive xelatex not working [ Was fontconfig : .so.2 not provided by 2.11.1?]

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:17:07AM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote: > $ ls -ld /usr/pkgsrc/*/*texlive* pkgsrc is my preferred way (for anything but latex) and I have already checked the above. I have discussed this in the lists before that pkgsrc does not provide full texlive functionality. For example

Re: texlive xelatex not working [ Was fontconfig : .so.2 not provided by 2.11.1?]

On Jan 22, 2016, at 1:51 PM, Mark Davies wrote: > I do have a script that takes a texlive package and creates a (first cut at > a) > pkgsrc package for it. I really should clean it up and commit it to pkgtools. Please do that. I know I regularly come across TeX packages

Re: ataraid issue was Re: [netbsd-7] Critical issue with ffs+log

On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:03:51AM +0100, BERTRAND Joël wrote: > Michael van Elst a écrit : > >joel.bertr...@systella.fr (=?UTF-8?Q?BERTRAND_Jo=c3=abl?=) writes: > > > >>By dkctl wd0/1 setcache none save ? I will try next saturday. But if > >>both disks are unsynchronized, how can I force a

Re: tmux overhead

On Fri 22 Jan 2016 at 05:57:44 +, Michael van Elst wrote: > The window name is refreshed twice a second: I think you can turn that off: set-window-option -g automatic-rename off I tried once to replace screen with tmux, but there was something important that I was missing. I think it was

Re: tmux overhead

The Linux version of tmux is notorious for a noticeable CPU overload too (try Google 'tmux CPU usage'), something to do with the original design. 2016-01-22 1:59 GMT+03:00 John Klos : > Hi, all, > > Since tmux is part of a standard NetBSD install, I've been using it instead >

Re: texlive xelatex not working [ Was fontconfig : .so.2 not provided by 2.11.1?]

On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:40:09PM -0600, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: > I don't know answer if full TeX Live distrubution is available in > pkgsrc, but I use the pkgsrc for my LaTeX related work every week for > over a decade. I have generated many documents (including books for > print) and it has