Re: Status of RPi 3 (b) ?

Swift Griggs writes: > On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, Brad Spencer wrote: [snip] >> I have 3 RPI3b v1.2 boards. Two of them will not boot NetBSD 9 out of >> 10 times. They will hang between these two lines: > > That sounds like a bummer. I'll watch for the same issue. Ya,

Re: Status of RPi 3 (b) ?

On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, Brad Spencer wrote: You will need to use something -currentish. I mostly run a 7.99.42 kernel with some local mods. Thanks for the tip. I have 3 RPI3b v1.2 boards. Two of them will not boot NetBSD 9 out of 10 times. They will hang between these two lines: That sounds

Re: Status of RPi 3 (b) ?

Swift Griggs writes: > On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, Brian Buhrow wrote: >> I'm using NetBSD-current on an RPI3, using the RPI2 images. Everything >> seems to work except for the wireless and bluetooth modules. > > Right on. I was trying a 7.x release, I think. I can't remember.

Re: Status of RPi 3 (b) ?

I'm sitting here complaining to the Lives group about the unsharp mask plugin, trying to sharpen a video, on my 3B under Raspbian. Haven't tried NetBSD on it in a couple months. I thought the WiFi worked with plugin USB WiFi dongles though. At $5 or less they're an option. -- Credit is the

Re: Status of RPi 3 (b) ?

On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, Brian Buhrow wrote: I'm using NetBSD-current on an RPI3, using the RPI2 images. Everything seems to work except for the wireless and bluetooth modules. Right on. I was trying a 7.x release, I think. I can't remember. Anyhow, I'll just use a -current image and try again. At

Re: Status of RPi 3 (b) ?

hello. I'm using NetBSD-current on an RPI3, using the RPI2 images. Everything seems to work except for the wireless and bluetooth modules. The dmesg for this is below. Note that this is -current from the end of November 2016. -Brian Copyright (c) 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001,

Status of RPi 3 (b) ?

I just picked up an RPI3. I guess I should have waited. A few congenitally systemd-infected distros work on it, but not much else. FreeBSD was a notable exception. It seems to work, but I managed to hork up the SD card jacking around with ZFS before I could test X11 and other stuff. No big

Re: Why is a wedge on RAID 10x slower?

On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, Patrick Welche wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:30:51AM +, Stephen Borrill wrote: mlelstv pointed out that because of the 64 sectPerSU RAIDframe setting (i.e. 128 sectors of data with 3 components, or 64k), the stripe unit is 32k, but the whole stripe is 64k. By

Re: Why is a wedge on RAID 10x slower?

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:30:51AM +, Stephen Borrill wrote: > mlelstv pointed out that because of the 64 sectPerSU RAIDframe setting (i.e. > 128 sectors of data with 3 components, or 64k), the stripe unit is 32k, but > the whole stripe is 64k. By starting the wedge at 64 sectors, > this is