> I use trn; old skool.
vnews leaves your choice tattered in threads, as it were.
--lyndon
In article <87h942lrje@gmx.com>, scole_mail wrote:
>"Thomas Mueller" writes:
>>
>> from Dave Huang:
>>
>>> Gnus can do NNTP access very well.
>>
>> That unfortunately requires Emacs, which I found too difficult; I
>tried in both Linux and
"Thomas Mueller" writes:
>
> from Dave Huang:
>
>> Gnus can do NNTP access very well.
>
> That unfortunately requires Emacs, which I found too difficult; I tried in
> both Linux and DOS.
>
> I find vi easier, and good even without a graphic interface.
>
I also use
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 16:47:42 +0100, "Rocky Hotas"
wrote:
> > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 at 3:10 PM
> > From: "Christos Zoulas"
>
> > And it is the BIOS in the machine that does not configure the ppb bridge
> > properly, so nothing that
> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 at 3:10 PM
> From: "Christos Zoulas"
> To: "Stephen Borrill" , "Rocky Hotas"
>
> Cc: netbsd-users@NetBSD.org
> Subject: Re: Problem with Intel WiFi card
>
[...]
> | Just to clarify, Intel WiFi
On Feb 9, 1:16pm, net...@precedence.co.uk (Stephen Borrill) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: Problem with Intel WiFi card
| > Yes, the function ppbattach is much more "hinged" here than in NetBSD.
| > I would anyway suggest you to think about this issue, because Intel WiFi
Link 5100 is a very common card
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017, Rocky Hotas wrote:
This is a lot of work to make the bus configure manually. Looks like OpenBSD
has a lot more code (integrated this patch and more) in
http://bxr.su/OpenBSD/sys/dev/pci/ppb.c
to do this...
Yes, the function ppbattach is much more "hinged" here than in
> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 at 4:02 PM
> From: "Christos Zoulas"
> To: "Rocky Hotas"
> Cc: netbsd-users@netbsd.org
> Subject: Re: Problem with Intel WiFi card
>
[...]
> This is a lot of work to make the bus configure manually. Looks like OpenBSD