Re: blacklistd and bpfjit

2017-03-27 Thread coypu
npf attempts to auto load bpfjit, if it receives an error (such as 'permission denied because securelevel=1'), it will report that bpfjit is not loaded and this is a performance problem, even if bpfjit is already loaded. in -8 it will no longer do this.

Re: blacklistd and bpfjit

2017-03-27 Thread Gerard Lally
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017, at 17:22, atomicules wrote: > >npfctl: error loading the bpfjit module; performance will be degraded: > >Operation not permitted > >npfctl: To disable this warning `set bpf.jit off' in /etc/npf.conf > > I think that's a XEN issue. I've been playing about with npf and >

Re: blacklistd and bpfjit

2017-03-27 Thread atomicules
npfctl: error loading the bpfjit module; performance will be degraded: Operation not permitted npfctl: To disable this warning `set bpf.jit off' in /etc/npf.conf I think that's a XEN issue. I've been playing about with npf and building kernels and I cannot get bpfjit to work on XEN even though

blacklistd and bpfjit

2017-03-27 Thread Gerard Lally
I have been testing blacklistd today. It works nicely, but one thing I don't understand is whether or not the bpfjit module is needed. I have securelevel=1 in rc.conf. To load the module early, before securelevel gets raised, I added bpfjit to /etc/modules.conf, and then "set bpf.jit on;" in