On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:59 AM, D'Arcy Cain wrote:
> ifconfig tun0 create
> ifconfig tun0 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 netmask 0xfffc
> route add 10.0.0.2/32 10.0.0.1 # should this be necessary?
> route add 192.168.215.0/24 10.0.0.2
>
> On the internal machine I do this:
>
> ifconfig
"D'Arcy Cain" wrote:
=> I am trying to set up a VPN between two NetBSD boxes, one of which has a
=> public address. Here is what I do on the public machine in rc.local:
=>
=> ifconfig tun0 create
=> ifconfig tun0 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 netmask 0xfffc
=> route add 10.0.0.2/32
I am trying to set up a VPN between two NetBSD boxes, one of which has a
public address. Here is what I do on the public machine in rc.local:
ifconfig tun0 create
ifconfig tun0 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 netmask 0xfffc
route add 10.0.0.2/32 10.0.0.1 # should this be necessary?
route add
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Roy Bixler wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that our network does not use Cisco as the router. I
> think that the admin. uses some kind of a Linux distribution which he
> then sets up with an OSPF daemon and so forth.
I'll say it another way: Once you