On 9/20/2017 5:12 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
In article ,
Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
I have used netbsd-6 and netbsd-7 with racoon to set up IKEv1/L2TP/IPsec
VPN with Windows clients. I have not tried IKEv2 and based on the
In article ,
Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
>I have used netbsd-6 and netbsd-7 with racoon to set up IKEv1/L2TP/IPsec
>VPN with Windows clients. I have not tried IKEv2 and based on the little
>research I have done I don't think it is
I have used netbsd-6 and netbsd-7 with racoon to set up IKEv1/L2TP/IPsec
VPN with Windows clients. I have not tried IKEv2 and based on the little
research I have done I don't think it is possible using an out of the box
NetBSD/pkgsrc configuration. Even for IKEv1 I needed to hack the NetBSD
In article <1505857797.1933676.680920.129e4...@webmail.messagingengine.com>,
Gerard Lally wrote:
>Some years ago I successfully set up netbsd-6 OpenVPN endpoints, with
>20-30 remote Windows clients connecting.
>
>I'd now like to set up a netbsd-8 VPN, based on
Jeff Rizzo writes:
> I just noticed that a host of mine running as a Xen guest is not
> getting (or maybe just sending) ipv6 packets correctly. It's running
> pretty much the same as some physical hosts, and the only difference I
> can see is the Xen (and vioif) aspect.
Some years ago I successfully set up netbsd-6 OpenVPN endpoints, with
20-30 remote Windows clients connecting.
I'd now like to set up a netbsd-8 VPN, based on IKEv2/IPsec. The
documentation doesn't make it clear -- to me -- if such a setup is
possible. Ideally it would be nice if strongSwan was