Re: new NetBSD port for Tile-GX processor

2018-04-17 Thread Kamil Rytarowski
Adding some more context, Tile CPUs are marked for removal from the Linux kernel. It would be great to see it supported by NetBSD, at least as long as we could use qemu. http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1804.1/06654.html On 16.04.2018 19:20, Diana Eichert wrote: > I know I'm

Re: lang/swi-prolog-lite : lighter still

2018-04-17 Thread Leonardo Taccari
Leonardo Taccari writes: > [...] > Mmh, at least for bash I think that it was only needed because in > older versions probably `dotfiles/edit' was installed and needed > bash, but it doesn't seem no longer true for 6.6.6! > [...] Whoops, sorry, I am wrong, at least library/prolog_pack.pl needs

Re: lang/swi-prolog-lite : lighter still

2018-04-17 Thread Leonardo Taccari
Hello Kathe, Kathe writes: > can the swi-prolog-lite package be made even more lighter? > i saw http://pkgsrc.se/lang/swi-prolog-lite and wondered > if it's dependence on bash, gmp and readline can be removed. > thanks. Mmh, at least for bash I think that it was only needed because in older

Re: lang/swi-prolog-lite : lighter still

2018-04-17 Thread Kathe
neither do i have the skills, nor the knowledge. :( > From bounces-netbsd-users-owner-kathe=sdf@netbsd.org Tue Apr 17 09:39:49 > 2018 > From: Benny Siegert > Subject: Re: lang/swi-prolog-lite : lighter still > To: ka...@sdf.org > Cc: netbsd-users@netbsd.org > Sender:

Re: lang/swi-prolog-lite : lighter still

2018-04-17 Thread Benny Siegert
Would you be willing to submit a patch and send a PR? On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:05 AM Kathe wrote: > can the swi-prolog-lite package be made even more lighter? > i saw http://pkgsrc.se/lang/swi-prolog-lite and wondered > if it's dependence on bash, gmp and readline can be

lang/swi-prolog-lite : lighter still

2018-04-17 Thread Kathe
can the swi-prolog-lite package be made even more lighter? i saw http://pkgsrc.se/lang/swi-prolog-lite and wondered if it's dependence on bash, gmp and readline can be removed. thanks.