Spot on!
Midori is running now. No errors or missing libs when launching it from the
terminal.
Accessed a couple of web pages just to try without any issues. That's
great, Thx!
/Pedro
P.S.: Will the fix be pushed to the repo? Or are you still looking for a
permanent fix?
Den sön 20 jan. 2019
Sometimes it's a bit strange with mailing lists ;)
I've installed gcc6-libs and that fixed the problem. I'm really happy for
it and would like to thank you all for bearing with me.
I've been testing the browser for 15min and its working. Although, I have
to figure out why its eating ~70% of my
I wonder if the absence of some packages in the archives (like gimp in 2018Q4)
are related to what I’m seeing in my builds. Some packages build successfully
as individual builds, but fail to build when part of a pbulk build. Both done
inside a sandbox.
The one I’m trying to figure out right
On Sun, 2019-01-20 at 22:26 +0100, Pedro Pinho wrote:
> Sometimes it's a bit strange with mailing lists ;)
> I've installed gcc6-libs and that fixed the problem. I'm really happy for it
> and would like to thank you all for bearing with me.
> I've been testing the browser for 15min and its
On Sun, 2019-01-20 at 17:34 +0100, Pedro Pinho wrote:
> The symlink was just a test, I've removed it as I got another missing library.
>
> Here's the output of ldd /usr/pkg/bin/midori https://pastebin.com/h6wbXvBu
> and the output of ldd /usr/pkg/lib/lib*.so https://pastebin.com/UPT68xaw
> the
Leonardo Taccari writes:
> Greg Troxel writes:
>> [...]
>> Overall, just randomly trying things isn't going to help. We need to
>> find the bug so we can fix it.
>>
>>
>> How are other people doing with these packages and netbsd-8?
>>
>> Is it just midori? Are there other packages that have
Greg Troxel writes:
> [...]
> Overall, just randomly trying things isn't going to help. We need to
> find the bug so we can fix it.
>
>
> How are other people doing with these packages and netbsd-8?
>
> Is it just midori? Are there other packages that have binaries that try
> to load
Good luck building midori from source. I have tried at least three
times on recent -current with current and updated pkgsrc with no luck
whatsoever. The latest is this afternoon - webkit-gtk does not build:
[ 92%] Building CXX object
The symlink was just a test, I've removed it as I got another missing
library.
Here's the output of ldd /usr/pkg/bin/midori https://pastebin.com/h6wbXvBu
and the output of ldd /usr/pkg/lib/lib*.so https://pastebin.com/UPT68xaw
the last one, i.e. ldd /usr/pkg/bin gives just read error: Operation
Just found another missing package from 2018Q4, gimp is not available as a
binary package.
Den sön 20 jan. 2019 kl 17:34 skrev Pedro Pinho :
> The symlink was just a test, I've removed it as I got another missing
> library.
>
> Here's the output of ldd /usr/pkg/bin/midori
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 02:45:57PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > > > I have completely no idea why 8.0-STABLE can't take non-integer value.
> > > Is there a locale issu involved?
> > [root@ranir ~]$ sleep 0.05
> > [root@ranir ~]$ export LC_ALL=ru_RU.UTF-8
> > [root@ranir ~]$ sleep 0.05
> >
On Sun 20 Jan 2019 at 08:58:55 -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
> From that find the root cause, which is something that directly includes
> it, vs including a library that includes it. ldd makes this not that
> easy.
FreeBSD's ldd has an option to show just the libraries that are required
directly
Pedro Pinho writes:
> Back at home!
> I've just erased my disk using gpsrted-live usb and made a fresh install
> from the image here,
> http://ftp.fr.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-daily/netbsd-8/201901151910Z/images/
>
> NetBSD 8.0 STABLE arch amd64
>
> Pointed pkgin to
>
Hi all,
A bit short of time today, but...
I'll try to post the output from ldd later today. It was rather long, so
maybe a link to pastebin or similar is better.
I think both of you (Dave, Robert and Martin) are probably right about how
the binary was built.
I could use another browser, but I want
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 06:45:16PM -0500, David H. Gutteridge wrote:
> Though I don't think this is the most likely answer here, another
> possibility is that the problem packages have been built on a machine
> running an 8.0_BETA release from prior to Oct. 12, 2017. Because prior
> to that,
Back at home!
I've just erased my disk using gpsrted-live usb and made a fresh install
from the image here,
http://ftp.fr.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-daily/netbsd-8/201901151910Z/images/
NetBSD 8.0 STABLE arch amd64
Pointed pkgin to
http://ftp.fr.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/packages/NetBSD/amd64/8.0/All/
16 matches
Mail list logo
