aa...@zadzmo.org ("Aaron B.") writes:
>This isn't really a thing where I live. The ISP's here routinely return
>A records to a scammy "search engine" instead of NXDOMAIN.
Yes, that was very popular here. But, also for legal reasons, the
providers only manipulated the answers of their own DNS
So I'm not big into DNS and I don't have a firm grasp on all of these
techniques, but I have an idea.
This is all just a big game of who are you hiding from right? If you
hide from your ISP, now you have to trust the DNS server provider. Who
among them are to be trusted?
For example I'm pretty
At Mon, 25 May 2020 19:51:52 -0400, "Aaron B." wrote:
Subject: Re: Securing DNS traffic
>
> Again, I'd prefer to run my own resolvers, but can't justify the
> expense.
I would recommend begging or borrowing _any_ old used computer that can
run any open-source OS (though ideally NetBSD, of
On Mon, 25 May 2020 12:57:59 +0200
Niels Dettenbach wrote:
> I would trust my (paid) ISPs NS much more then any other "free" one by all
> what i've seen in my life there - especially if your ISP grants you no usage
> logging by contract.
This isn't really a thing where I live. The ISP's here
One of the drives failed and I’d set the drives up as a single volume, oops.
I brought up Windows temporarily to do the one firmware update I didn’t seem to
be able to do any other way (the storage controller) and then reinstalled
NetBSD.
Now that I’ve reinstalled, have a dmesg:
I'm currently using a Raspberry Pi Zero with a camera for something
(using raspbian), and I want to do something similar but I'm hoping to
get onboard GPS. I want to run it on a battery.
Also if the WiFi adapter could do hostap, this would be a bonus.
Does such a thing exist?
A USB camera could
Sad Clouds wrote in
<20200525152338.beed20b18e42642ec3403...@gmail.com>:
|On Fri, 22 May 2020 22:38:19 +0100
|Sad Clouds wrote:
|
|> It seems there are two main security enhancements for DNS:
|>
|> 1. DNSSEC - digital signatures for DNS records to verify they haven't
|> been tampered
Am Sonntag, 24. Mai 2020, 20:02:45 CEST schrieb Aaron B.:
> I'm also worried about this, but also fear datamining by my ISP. So I
> completely ditched Google, and split my queries between Cloudflare and
> Quad9 - neither gets the complete picture.
This relys on a typical misunderstanding what most
Am Samstag, 23. Mai 2020, 12:09:09 CEST schrieb Sad Clouds:
> I was thinking about this as well, but is there any real evidence that
> public DNS providers misuse your personal data?
Depends from what you "expect" as "misuse".
Running "free" public NS to i.e. "just collect domain names" and
On Fri, 22 May 2020 22:38:19 +0100
Sad Clouds wrote:
> It seems there are two main security enhancements for DNS:
>
> 1. DNSSEC - digital signatures for DNS records to verify they haven't
> been tampered with.
>
> 2. DNS over TLS - encryption of DNS traffic for privacy. This goes via
> port
On Mon, 25 May 2020 10:17:56 +0200
Jörn Clausen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I was not arguing for "no security at all". It's just this motivation
> for DoT/DoH (disguising the request from your ISP) that I don't get.
>
> I have only a cursory knowledge of these technologies, but I think
> DNSSEC is the
Hi!
I was not arguing for "no security at all". It's just this motivation for
DoT/DoH (disguising the request from your ISP) that I don't get.
I have only a cursory knowledge of these technologies, but I think DNSSEC
is the far better approach against the type of forgery you mentioned. Why
do
12 matches
Mail list logo
