Hi,
my Asus laptop comes up with:
[ 1.026365] wpi0 at pci4 dev 0 function 0: vendor 8086 product 4222
(rev. 0x02)
[ 1.026365] wpi0: interrupting at msi2 vec 0
[ 1.026365] wpi0: MoW2, address 00:13:02:21:b0:e3
[ 1.026365] wpi0: 11a rates: 6Mbps 9Mbps 12Mbps 18Mbps 24Mbps
Hi,.
let me update on this. I updated the BIOS of the machine (hard process:
you need windows 7, administrator rights and a charged and good battery
beyond wall-plug to update this Acer Aspire 9410).
With the new BIOS, OpenBSD is capable of booting and running X11 "out of
the box" with no
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020, Dmitrii Postolov wrote:
I am owner of two Acer computers that have generally proven to be good with
NetBSD. But in Acer Aspire XC-895 audio output for some reason only works when
connecting a cable to the back panel of the computer, audio output to the
headphones on the
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020, Michael Parson wrote:
On 2020-11-30 08:45, Matthias Petermann wrote:
So I'll keep looking - the bar is now set at mRemoteNG ;-)
I'd never used mRemoteNG, but looking at features on the website, it
looks like pkgsrc/net/remmina might be a contender.
Responding to
On 2020-11-30 08:45, Matthias Petermann wrote:
So I'll keep looking - the bar is now set at mRemoteNG ;-)
I'd never used mRemoteNG, but looking at features on the website, it
looks like pkgsrc/net/remmina might be a contender.
--
Michael Parson
Pflugerville, TX
KF5LGQ
Hi! Sorry for my bad English...
I am owner of two Acer computers that have generally proven to be good with
NetBSD. But in Acer Aspire XC-895 audio output for some reason only works when
connecting a cable to the back panel of the computer, audio output to the
headphones on the front panel
Just an FYI
Seems like starting from Ansible v 2.11, NetBSD will be detectable in
the OS config family
Meaning that NetBSD specific ansible scripts can be easily segregated,
without custom OS version checks.
That, in turn, should allow more package developers to support NetBSD.
And that, in
On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 16:14:18 +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 09:49:39AM -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> I don't see why part of npf is built in and the other part isn't.
>
> Indeed, for architectures supported by bpfjit (and where it works) they
> should go together.
Is there
