b4c0:228b:6dc5:adb9:c4e8:d0fe prefixlen 64
Please someone point me out.
Thank you in advance.
--
Gua Chung Lim
If you desire knowledges, learn one thing everyday.
If you desire wisdom, leave one thing everyday.
-- Lao Tzu
cards.
Exactly, that is my question. I'm also not sure if NetBSD supports Mac's NIC.
Probably NO. But NetBSD network is working pretty fine behind VM even with
bridge networking. How is it possible?
--
Gua Chung Lim
If you desire knowledges, learn one thing everyday.
If you desire wisdom, leave one thing everyday.
-- Lao Tzu
from there to the other
> NetBSD machine and clear the arp cache.
Your host is Windows 10, not Mac. NetBSD probably supports your laptop's NIC.
But on a Macbook, it doesn't support.
Thank you again for spending your valued time to my questions.
--
Gua Chung Lim
If you desire knowledges, learn one thing everyday.
If you desire wisdom, leave one thing everyday.
-- Lao Tzu
ve no problems at all. The network works pretty fine.
There are not any issues. This thread should be considered as closed.
Thank you very much.
--
Gua Chung Lim
If you desire knowledges, learn one thing everyday.
If you desire wisdom, leave one thing everyday.
-- Lao Tzu
ase.
I'm not quite sure what you mean.
But on my machine, NetBSD runs behind VirtualBox on macOS host pretty
fine with default configuration. I have been running it for years.
--
Gua Chung Lim
If you desire knowledges, learn one thing everyday.
If you desire wisdom, leave one thing everyday.
-- Lao Tzu
cessary, should I post my /etc/npf.conf?
--
Gua Chung Lim
If you desire knowledges, learn one thing everyday.
If you desire wisdom, leave one thing everyday.
-- Lao Tzu
0)
$int_if1 = inet4(wm1)
$ext_if6 = inet6(wm0)
A warning occurs on the second line, column 21.
How can this be an error?
Defining the interfaces is so simple.
I didn't see anything wrong here.
Anyone plese point me out.
Thanks,
--
Gua Chung Lim
If you desire knowledges, learn one thing everyday.
ou are right. It seems much likely, my wm0 is wireless. But how can I fix it?
Warning(s) during boot, IMHO, looks bad. At least it did not occur on 6_STABLE.
(Now I'm on 7_STABLE.)
Thanks,
--
Gua Chung Lim
If you desire knowledges, learn one thing everyday.
If you desire wisdom, leave one thing everyday.
-- Lao Tzu
ou are absolutely right. I tried removing -b flag.
Now there are no warnings at all. Thing is fixed. :-)
Thank you very much.
--
Gua Chung Lim
If you desire knowledges, learn one thing everyday.
If you desire wisdom, leave one thing everyday.
-- Lao Tzu
usr/share/zoneinfo/Asia/Bangkok
Thanks you,
--
Gua Chung Lim
To live is to love.
* Gua Chung Lim (gua.chung...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Few minutes after boot, I usually get...
> WARNING: negative runtime; monotonic clock has gone backwards
> It is in green text on /dev/console, but everything works pretty fine, no
> problems at all.
I found this...
https://mail-inde
SC(q=3000, f=1900224710 Hz) clockinterrupt(q=0,
f=100 Hz) ACPI-Safe(q=900, f=3579545 Hz) lapic(q=-100, f=1001210085 Hz)
i8254(q=100, f=1193182 Hz) dummy(q=-100, f=100 Hz)
kern.timecounter.hardware = TSC
kern.timecounter.timestepwarnings = 0
Thank you,
--
Gua Chung Lim
To live is to love.
ser.com/questions/393887/dhclient-and-dhcpcd-the-real-difference
--
Gua Chung Lim
To live is to love.
wheel 180135 Feb 3 20:40 nbmake*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel1066 Feb 3 21:10 nbmake-amd64*
root@netbsd:/usr/tools/bin#
--
Gua Chung Lim
To live is to love.
oot@netbsd.localdomain:/usr/obj/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC amd64
I'm now building distribution.
To see if it gets compiled.
Thank you,
--
Gua Chung Lim
To live is to love.
* Gua Chung Lim (gua.chung...@gmail.com) wrote:
> * Fekete Zoltn (fekete.zol...@minux.hu) wrote:
> > Appending -u after -U does solve the problem?
> I fixed it. I simply do ./build.sh kernel=GENERIC, without any options.
>
> lim@netbsd:~% uname -a
> NetBSD netbsd.localdom
se. Sad to see this in
> project goals. sorry.
Absolutely agreed with Vitaly. This news upsets me.
I don't think NetBSD will or ever need any features being ported from mac.
I also own mac, but I use it for something else.
launchd on mac is something equivalent to systemd on Linux. :-(
--
Gua Chung Lim
To live is to love.
oad=npf_ext_log
load=npf_ext_normalize
--
Gua Chung Lim
"UNIX is basically a simple operating system,
but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity."
-- Dennis M. Ritchie
* Gua Chung Lim (gua.chung...@gmail.com) wrote:
> * Edgar Pettijohn (ed...@pettijohn-web.com) wrote:
> > Looks like I may need to load some modules.
>
> # modload npf
> # cd /dev
> # sh MAKEDEV npf
> # modload npf_ext_log
> # modload npf_ext_normalize
> # ifco
.
Thank you,
--
Gua Chung Lim
"UNIX is basically a simple operating system,
but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity."
-- Dennis M. Ritchie
Sorry for my typo...
> # mv /netbsd /netbsd.old
> # mv /usr/obj/sys/arch/i386/compile/CUSTOM/netbsd /
# mv /usr/obj/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC/netbsd /
* Gua Chung Lim (gua.chung...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Few months ago, I tried NetBSD 8.0 RC1. Booting failed.
> T
result.
https://i.imgur.com/9t3MJlx.png
Thank you,
--
Gua Chung Lim
"UNIX is basically a simple operating system,
but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity."
-- Dennis M. Ritchie
try with a kernel from the official build?
> Since you had (unclear) local build issues, this would rule out any
> local issues (and also allow us to map the crash address better).
Does this mean I have to reinstall the new OS from binary and everything in
pkgsrc, once again?
Thank yo
* Martin Husemann (mar...@duskware.de) wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 05:55:30PM +0700, Gua Chung Lim wrote:
> > * Martin Husemann (mar...@duskware.de) wrote:
> > > Can you please try with a kernel from the official build?
> > > Since you had (unclear) local build issu
load=npf_ext_normalize
That's it. It boots.
But how can I re-enable NPF in NetBSD 8?
Thank you,
--
Gua Chung Lim
"UNIX is basically a simple operating system,
but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity."
-- Dennis M. Ritchie
* Gua Chung Lim (gua.chung...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I have resurrected it from crash.
> I boot from dvd and mount /dev/wd0a then edit /boot.cfg .
> Then I remove these three lines.
>
> load=npf
> load=npf_ext_log
> load=npf_ext_normalize
>
> That's it. It boots.
>
after reboot then panic. at modules...?
> https://imgur.com/a/LRuTSNs
>
> sysupgrade support update from stable ? (e.g 7.1.2)
>
>
> --
> miwarin
--
Gua Chung Lim
"UNIX is basically a simple operating system,
but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity."
-- Dennis M. Ritchie
* Miwa Susumu (miwa...@gmail.com) wrote:
> by the way. how did you go to prompt?
Boot from DVD, mount root filesystem then edit /boot.cfg.
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2018/07/23/msg021128.html
--
Gua Chung Lim
"UNIX is basically a simple operating system,
but you have
::1%wm0
Thanks,
--
Gua Chung Lim
"UNIX is basically a simple operating system,
but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity."
-- Dennis M. Ritchie
t=YES
#wpa_supplicant_flags="-i iwm0 -c /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf"
ip6mode="autohost"
dhcpcd=YES
dhcpcd_flags="-t 0" # -b
#ifconfig_wm0=dhcp
I don't know where I shall investigate.
Any suggestion would be much appreciated.
* Gua Chung Lim (gua.chung...@gmail.com) wr
viding
> the IPv6 info, even better.
Shall try and see if it works. Thanks,
--
Gua Chung Lim
"UNIX is basically a simple operating system,
but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity."
-- Dennis M. Ritchie
f a global v6 ping to an address works, and one to a
> hostname does not, then that would be evidence of DNS issues, and we
> would need to look in a different direction.
Both ping6 global address and canonical name fail.
> ps: I hope you are on the list, as gmail almost always rejects mail from me.
I am on the list. :-)
Thank you,
--
Gua Chung Lim
"UNIX is basically a simple operating system,
but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity."
-- Dennis M. Ritchie
ive
inet 192.168.56.56/24 broadcast 192.168.56.255 flags 0x0
inet 169.254.246.230/16 broadcast 169.254.255.255 flags 0x0
inet6 fe80::a00:27ff:fefd:a0e3%wm1/64 flags 0x0 scopeid 0x2
lo0: flags=0x8049 mtu 33624
inet 127.0.0.1/8 flags 0x0
inet6 ::1/128 flags 0x20
inet6 fe80::1%lo0/64 flags 0x0 scopeid 0x3
npflog0
machines on this LAN. All of them, except this
netbsd host, work with IPv6 pretty fine and without any efforts.
Thank you,
--
Gua Chung Lim
"UNIX is basically a simple operating system,
but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity."
-- Dennis M. Ritchie
* Gua Chung Lim (gua.chung...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Oh, how many other hosts are on this LAN? (Regardless of
> > whether they support v6 or not.) One possibility for the issue
> > might be if the router thinks the LAN link is down when your
> > host is down, and drops
resolution as it can always interpret
canonical names into numeric addresses for both inet and inet6.
Any ideas?
Thank you.
--
Gua Chung Lim
"UNIX is basically a simple operating system,
but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity."
-- Dennis M. Ritchie
hclient and rtsol (and kernel IPv6 addr autoconf)
> Since dhcpcd was not being used previously there would have been no
> old files to worry about, it would all be new.
No, it was using dhcpdc and rtsol on -7.
I haven't used dhclient for long, probably -5.
Thank you,
--
Gua Chung Li
/etc/dhcpcd.secret: No such file or directory
%
% ls -1 /var/db/dhcpcd
duid
secret
vioif0.lease
vioif0.lease6
wm0.lease
wm0.lease6
wm1.lease
> > > You can add `nodhcp6` to dhcpcd.conf to disable DHCP6 entirely.
> > I have done it.
> > % tail -n 2 /etc/dhcpcd.conf
> > logfile
on is highly appreciated.
Thanks,
--
Gua Chung Lim
"UNIX is basically a simple operating system,
but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity."
-- Dennis M. Ritchie
info-1
texinfo-2
texinfo-3
%
But I don't know if it is the cause of build fail.
Thanks,
--
Gua Chung Lim
"UNIX is basically a simple operating system,
but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity."
-- Dennis M. Ritchie
* Gua Chung Lim (gua.chung...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Apparently, the file '/usr/tools/info/make.info' is missing,
> as shown at the beginning of the log file.
Or this maybe the root cause.
Excerpted from /usr/src/sys/net/if_vlan.c lines 155 - 169.
struct ifvlan
* Gua Chung Lim (gua.chung...@gmail.com) wrote:
> There is no 'ifv_psz' member in struct ifvlan.
> Let me try fixing it.
Definitely correct,
Try this patch...
--- /usr/src/sys/net/if_vlan.c 2018-10-22 02:46:54.409390068 +0700
+++ if_vlan.c 2018-10-22 02:46:30.235596617 +0700
;?
(Note that I barely know what are extended by GNU.)
I believed that "asm" was extended by GNU.
Please correct me, if I'm wrong.
Thank you,
--
Gua Chung Lim
"UNIX is basically a simple operating system,
but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity."
-- Dennis M. Ritchie
etching, building and installing.
Next time everything will be very fast as you fetch, build or install only the
daily patches.
Last but not least, check you clock. If it runs out of the baterry, replace it.
Cheers,
--
Gua Chung Lim
"UNIX is basically a simple operating system,
but you
novice like me to choose which sets should I require. So I opt /usr/src.
I've never tried this link. One question, does this give the STABLE?
--
Gua Chung Lim
"UNIX is basically a simple operating system,
but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity."
-- Dennis M. Ritchie
ozilla-rootcerts/
/usr/pkgsrc/security/mozilla-rootcerts-openssl/
I installed the first one.
Just cd into it the type ...
# make install clean clean-depends
--
Gua Chung Lim
"UNIX is basically a simple operating system,
but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity."
-- Dennis M. Ritchie
Typo correction, resend it again, sorry.
* Gua Chung Lim (gua.chung...@gmail.com) wrote:
/* FOR THE FIRST TIME */
* Get the source code (netbsd-8 branch tag a.k.a. 8_STABLE)
# setenv CVS_RSH ssh
# setenv CVSROOT anon...@anoncvs.netbsd.org:/cvsroot
# mkdir /usr/src
# cd /usr
# cvs
* Gua Chung Lim (gua.chung...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > It has (see other messages in this thread).
> > It is: http://nycdn.NetBSD.org/pub/NetBSD-daily/netbsd-8/latest/
> I've never tried this link. One question, does this give the STABLE?
Answer to my question...
Yes, pretty
D so far? Did you use the same
> sources?
> Regardless of the answer, is using ZFSoLinux a consideration for future
> development?
ZFS is not BSD.
It is CDDL. see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Development_and_Distribution_License
FreeBSD doesn't care much about the license.
But
Hi All,
netbsd-8 build fails on 6/12/2019 as the following link.
(Last success build was on 6/3/2019)
https://pastebin.com/raw/c49gBNHW
--
Gua Chung Lim
"UNIX is basically a simple operating system,
but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity."
-- Dennis M. Ritchie
> If the partition is more than 2To, will the FFSv1 be unable to access
> some blocks?
AFAIK, FFS or FFS2 suports pretty big slice (much bigger than 2TB).
The actual limitation is MBR. Maybe you have to use GPT.
Correct me. if I'm wrong.
--
Gua Chung Lim
"UNIX is basically a
ccess was on Sep 12, 2019.
Any ideas or suggestion? Thanks,
--
Gua Chung Lim
"UNIX is basically a simple operating system,
but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity."
-- Dennis M. Ritchie
Sorry, I haven't mentioned.
% uname -a
NetBSD sirius 9.0_BETA NetBSD 9.0_BETA (GENERIC) #16: Fri Sep 13 00:16:42 +07
2019 root@sirius:/usr/obj/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC amd64
The last success was on Sep 13, 2019 (16 minutes after midnight so I thought
Sep 12).
* Gua Chung Lim
> today, so it must be a local issue.
What should it be?
Thanks,
--
Gua Chung Lim
"UNIX is basically a simple operating system,
but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity."
-- Dennis M. Ritchie
es in /etc/mk.conf.
Thanks,
--
Gua Chung Lim
"UNIX is basically a simple operating system,
but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity."
-- Dennis M. Ritchie
w what happened.
I'm not sure if new patches relate.
Lastly,
% uname -a
NetBSD sirius 9.0_BETA NetBSD 9.0_BETA (GENERIC) #17: Wed Sep 18 22:15:58 +07
2019 root@sirius:/usr/obj/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC amd64
17th build already (kernel)
Thanks,
--
Gua Chung Lim
"UNIX is basica
The former one is for current branch, and the other one for netbsd-9 branch.
--
Gua Chung Lim
Nothing ever exists entirely alone without relativity. --me
* Gua Chung Lim wrote:
> The former one is for current branch, and the other one for netbsd-9 branch.
Oops, sorry I misread your question.
--
Gua Chung Lim
Nothing ever exists entirely alone without relativity. --me
It has been very stable since it was a BETA.
* Pedro Pinho wrote:
> Despite not being announced yet, 9.0-RC2 is running perfectly
> on my machine since yesterday afternoon.
> Just want to say thanks to everyone tjat pulled this together.
--
Gua Chung Lim
Nothing ever exists entir
ty and clean source code.
Thanks,
--
Gua Chung Lim
Life is a pleasant lie and death is a painful truth.
h more portable than any other languages including C++,
which has too many standards.
And C++ committee doesn't even care backward compatability.
So please adhere with only C, like what POSIX does.
--
Gua Chung Lim
Life is a pleasant lie and death is a painful truth.
61 matches
Mail list logo
