On 04/02/2019 21:45, Sad Clouds wrote:
I've tried those options before, but performance gain was marginal
compared to gigabit ethernet speeds, i.e. it went up from 13 MiB/sec to
around 17 MiB/sec. But I guess 30% gain is better than nothing.
I think Sun Ultra10 has 32-bit 33 MHz PCI bus, so in
On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 20:45:13 +
Mike Pumford wrote:
> On 03/02/2019 12:07, Sad Clouds wrote:
> > On Sun, 3 Feb 2019 11:27:07 +0100
> > tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> >
> >> With all your help and from this summary, I suspect that the
> >> probable culprit is 3) above (linked also to 2) but
On 03/02/2019 12:07, Sad Clouds wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2019 11:27:07 +0100
tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
With all your help and from this summary, I suspect that the probable
culprit is 3) above (linked also to 2) but mainly 3): an instance
of Samba, serving a 10T or a 100T request is blocking
Hello,
On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 12:07:06PM +, Sad Clouds wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Feb 2019 11:27:07 +0100
> tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
>
> > With all your help and from this summary, I suspect that the probable
> > culprit is 3) above (linked also to 2) but mainly 3): an instance
> > of Samba,
On Sun, 3 Feb 2019 11:27:07 +0100
tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> With all your help and from this summary, I suspect that the probable
> culprit is 3) above (linked also to 2) but mainly 3): an instance
> of Samba, serving a 10T or a 100T request is blocking on I/O,
You must have some ancient
Hello,
And thank you all for the answers!
In order to not have to interpolate the various informations, I will
summarize:
My initial question: I have a NetBSD server serving FFSv2 filesystems
via Samba (last pkgsrc version) through a 1000T ethernet card to a bunch
of Windows clients,
On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 17:01:18 +0100
tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a NetBSD serving FFSv2 filesystems to various Windows nodes via
> Samba.
>
> The network efficiency seems to me underpar.
And how did you determine that? There are so many factors that can
affect performance, you
On 2019-02-02 23:14, Michael van Elst wrote:
tlaro...@polynum.com writes:
Is the speed adapted to each connected device? Or does the serving card
fix the speed, during a slice of time, for all connexions to the minimum
speed?
Autonegotiation means that the card and the switch communicate and
tlaro...@polynum.com writes:
>Is the speed adapted to each connected device? Or does the serving card
>fix the speed, during a slice of time, for all connexions to the minimum
>speed?
Autonegotiation means that the card and the switch communicate and
agree on a speed.
>What is the "cost" of
tlaro...@polynum.com writes:
> I have a NetBSD serving FFSv2 filesystems to various Windows nodes via
> Samba.
>
> The network efficiency seems to me underpar.
I would recommend trying to test with ttcp or some such first, to
establish packet-handling baseline performance separate from remote
On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 10:18 AM wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a NetBSD serving FFSv2 filesystems to various Windows nodes via
> Samba.
>
> The network efficiency seems to me underpar.
>
> There is very probably Samba tuning involved. Windows tuning too. But a
> question arised to me about
Hello,
I have a NetBSD serving FFSv2 filesystems to various Windows nodes via
Samba.
The network efficiency seems to me underpar.
There is very probably Samba tuning involved. Windows tuning too. But a
question arised to me about miscellaneous speeds of ethernet cards
connecting to a card on
12 matches
Mail list logo
