On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:21:56AM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Linux root filesystem would initially be on FFS/UFS 1 or 2. Reason
> for -O 0 would be to make the Linux partition from NetBSD and write the
> partition from NetBSD. This would not be necessary from FreeBSD.
Martin Husemann
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:21:56AM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Linux root filesystem would initially be on FFS/UFS 1 or 2. Reason
> for -O 0 would be to make the Linux partition from NetBSD and write the
> partition from NetBSD. This would not be necessary from FreeBSD.
Using -O 0 for
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 01:11:10AM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > I think I might have to use "-O 0" for newfs_ext2fs from NetBSD, but
> > subsequently, using the Linux root file system, would not need to be so
> > fettered, would switch to more up-to-date options for Linux.
> I am not aware
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 01:11:10AM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> I think I might have to use "-O 0" for newfs_ext2fs from NetBSD, but
> subsequently, using the Linux root file system, would not need to be so
> fettered, would switch to more up-to-date options for Linux.
I am not aware of any
> > Question is how to determine what this format is for an already existing
> > ext2fs filesystem, either from base system or from e2fstools package.
> One solution would be to reboot with a GNU/Linux live/rescue system and check
> from there with `tune2fs -l`.
> The other way around, I do
Question is how to determine what this format is for an already existing ext2fs
filesystem, either from base system or from e2fstools package.
One solution would be to reboot with a GNU/Linux live/rescue system and check
from there with `tune2fs -l`.
The other way around, I do deploy NetBSD
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 2:39 AM Thomas Mueller wrote:
> I didn't know Gentoo make was gmake, haven't installed gentoo yet.
> Does Gentoo have a plain "make"?
Tom H responded:
> Gentoo has a "make" symlink to "gmake" if it's set to use the GNU
> userland and a "make" symlink to "pmake" (a port
from Edgar Pettijohn:
> My manual claims that -O 1 is the default at least for:
> NetBSD laptop 9.0 NetBSD 9.0 (GENERIC) #0: Fri Feb 14 00:06:28 UTC 2020
> mkre...@mkrepro.netbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC amd64
Rest of your message would not copy-and-paste without a big
On 02/23/20 19:54, Thomas Mueller wrote:
from Jason Mitchell:
Does dumpfs supply any useful info?
amelia2# dumpfs /dev/dk19
dumpfs: /dev/dk19: could not find superblock, skipped
I didn't think dumpfs would work on non-ffs/ufs filesystems.
Tom
My manual claims that -O 1 is the
from Jason Mitchell:
> Does dumpfs supply any useful info?
amelia2# dumpfs /dev/dk19
dumpfs: /dev/dk19: could not find superblock, skipped
I didn't think dumpfs would work on non-ffs/ufs filesystems.
Tom
I see there is newfs_ext2fs in NetBSD base system, and a parameter -O (can be
set to 0 or 1) for fileystem format: 0 is default for NetBSD.
Question is how to determine what this format is for an already existing ext2fs
filesystem, either from base system or from e2fstools package.
I tried
11 matches
Mail list logo
