Maya wrote:
>> Modular xorg in pkgsrc includes twm but not ctwm as far as I know,
>> so I don't get ctwm. I have no /usr/X11R7 or /usr/X11R6 directory.
>
> because ctwm is an independent package. it's wm/ctwm.
https://github.com/NetBSD/xsrc/tree/trunk/external/mit/ctwm/dist
There's also vtwm
> On Sun 09 Sep 2018 at 02:20:32 +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > I just looked on NetBSD installation, no ctwm.
> It is new for 8.0 I believe:
> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 40 Jul 17 16:59 /usr/X11R7/bin/ctwm*
> > I also don't think there is any ctwm in haikuports, couldn't find it.
> >
> On Sun 09 Sep 2018 at 02:20:32 +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > I just looked on NetBSD installation, no ctwm.
> It is new for 8.0 I believe:
> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 40 Jul 17 16:59 /usr/X11R7/bin/ctwm*
> > I also don't think there is any ctwm in haikuports, couldn't find it.
> >
Benny Siegert wrote in :
|On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 5:17 PM Steffen Nurpmeso \
|wrote:
|>
|> Nothing to continue in my eyes; you can always have more and
|> iterate over the code of course. No drag'n drop, of course. But
|> copy, that is enough for me. It used to use GNU autoconf;
|> i
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 5:17 PM Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
>
> Nothing to continue in my eyes; you can always have more and
> iterate over the code of course. No drag'n drop, of course. But
> copy, that is enough for me. It used to use GNU autoconf;
> i have patches and last i compiled it (a few
Thomas Mueller wrote in <20180909071938.644bfa7...@mail.duskware.de>:
..
|I didn't know about i3-gaps but now see it in FreeBSD ports but not pkgsrc.
Thing is also, you seem to have super-duper boxes whereas i am
happy to have tinyc in order to develop my little MUA and not more
than that
Thomas Mueller wrote in <20180908132956.6a9dea7...@mail.duskware.de>:
|from Pedro Pinho:
|
|> Here's a complete list of WM's for *nix systems
|> https://www.gilesorr.com/wm/table.html
|
|> What exactly do you mean with " I tried awesome some years ago, but the
|> "awesome"
On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 05:01:41PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> Not as fun as I had hoped! It has been a while since the last round, and I
> wondered, given an ideal world with infinite developer time and full
> documentation, with just an eye on correctness, what current views were on:
>
> *
> On Sat 08 Sep 2018 at 07:25:17 +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > I like substance as opposed to hot air, hence would stay away from
> > something like Enlightenment (seemed poorly documented, at least in the
> > time of NetBSD 7.99.1.
> Try ctwm. An older version is already installed
On Sat, 8 Sep 2018, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2018 07:25:17 +
From: Thomas Mueller
To: netbsd-users@netbsd.org, netbsd-users@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: Recommended desktop environment?
from Pedro Pinho:
Here's a complete list of WM's for *nix systems
https
Thanks for the answer.
I see Enlightment as a DE and not just a WM. Awesome, on the other hand is
a WM with a bar and I'm very happy running awesome :-)
As for i3, there's i3, https://i3wm.org/
and i3-gaps, https://github.com/Airblader/i3
There are plenty of tiling WM's.
Den lör 8 sep. 2018
On Sat 08 Sep 2018 at 07:25:17 +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> I like substance as opposed to hot air, hence would stay away from something
> like Enlightenment (seemed poorly documented, at least in the time of NetBSD
> 7.99.1.
Try ctwm. An older version is already installed with NetBSD. In
from Pedro Pinho:
> Here's a complete list of WM's for *nix systems
> https://www.gilesorr.com/wm/table.html
> What exactly do you mean with " I tried awesome some years ago, but the
> "awesome" decoration/artwork just got in the way and confused me"?
> Don't take me wrong, I would
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 07:38:17AM -0700, Andy Ruhl wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:09 AM Wean Irdeh wrote:
> >
> > Hi all mailing list members! What is your recommended desktop environment
> > for NetBSD?
>
> This should be fun.
Not as fun as I had hoped! It has
Pedro Pinho wrote in :
|Here's a complete list of WM's for *nix systems [1]https://www.gilesorr.\
|com/wm/table.html[/1]
|
| [1] https://www.gilesorr.com/wm/table.html
ahwm, only ahwm, since 2002. The original v0.9.0 ball with some
compiler fixes on top, not the github stuff. The "as close
Em qua, 5 de set de 2018 às 19:04, xpetrl escreveu:
>
> I used xfce for years and I spend lot of time just rearranging window
> with the mouse pointer, positioning for example a Firefox window next to
> xterm terminals. I was getting mad!
>
Hi.
I'm not sure it has always been a feature or if it
hat was so confusing.
Awesome user here ;-)
Den tors 6 sep. 2018 kl 12:05 skrev Thomas Mueller <
mueller6...@bellsouth.net>:
>
> > On 05.09.2018 12:04, Wean Irdeh wrote:
> > > Hi all mailing list members! What is your recommended desktop
> environment
> > > for Net
> On 05.09.2018 12:04, Wean Irdeh wrote:
> > Hi all mailing list members! What is your recommended desktop environment
> > for NetBSD?
> I used xfce for years and I spend lot of time just rearranging window with the
> mouse pointer, positioning for example a Firefox
On Wed 2018-09-05 17:04 , Wean Irdeh wrote:
> Hi all mailing list members! What is your recommended desktop environment for
> NetBSD?
The best wm ever is fvwm2.
/me hides ;)
Martin
ded desktop environment
> for NetBSD?
--
Jay Patel
*https://unitedbsd.com/ <https://unitedbsd.com/>*
*usually found @ https://riot.im/app/#/room/#bsd:matrix.org
<https://riot.im/app/#/room/%23bsd:matrix.org>*
On 05.09.2018 12:04, Wean Irdeh wrote:
Hi all mailing list members! What is your recommended desktop
environment for NetBSD?
I used xfce for years and I spend lot of time just rearranging window
with the mouse pointer, positioning for example a Firefox window next to
xterm terminals. I
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 17:31:00 +0200
Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:28:11PM +0100, Sad Clouds wrote:
> > Which hardware platform? If it's x86 then anything you can find in
> > pkgsrc will probably work. I tend to use xfce on x86, but on
> > sparc64 it had issues, so I used
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 05:04:08PM +0700, Wean Irdeh wrote:
>Hi all mailing list members! What is your recommended desktop environment
>for NetBSD?
What do you mean by "for NetBSD"? I do not think (barring availability) OS
has any bearing on choice of wm.
"recomme
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:28:11PM +0100, Sad Clouds wrote:
> Which hardware platform? If it's x86 then anything you can find in
> pkgsrc will probably work. I tend to use xfce on x86, but on sparc64 it
> had issues, so I used simple window manager like windowmaker.
FWIW, I am typing this on a
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 17:04:08 +0700
Wean Irdeh wrote:
> Hi all mailing list members! What is your recommended desktop
> environment for NetBSD?
Which hardware platform? If it's x86 then anything you can find in
pkgsrc will probably work. I tend to use xfce on x86, but on sparc64 it
had issu
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:09 AM Wean Irdeh wrote:
>
> Hi all mailing list members! What is your recommended desktop environment for
> NetBSD?
This should be fun. I'm way behind the times in this area. Way back in
the early 2000s or so I was using KDE3 on NetBSD quite happily. I
hav
://unitedbsd.com/t/what-does-your-bsd-look-like-screen-shots/109/9
Regards
Den ons 5 sep. 2018 12:09Wean Irdeh skrev:
> Hi all mailing list members! What is your recommended desktop environment
> for NetBSD?
Hi all mailing list members! What is your recommended desktop environment
for NetBSD?
28 matches
Mail list logo
