m...@netbsd.org writes:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 09:12:23PM +0100, Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
>> I was thinking that if ZFS were in the kernel, it might be easier to
>> get ZFS root.
>
>
> You don't need to build ZFS into the kernel to boot it as a root mount
> (same for FFS). The code to load
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 09:12:23PM +0100, Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
> I was thinking that if ZFS were in the kernel, it might be easier to
> get ZFS root.
You don't need to build ZFS into the kernel to boot it as a root mount
(same for FFS). The code to load modules from the bootloader already
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 09:12:23PM +0100, Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
>
> I was thinking that if ZFS were in the kernel, it might be easier to
> get ZFS root.
>
then booting from a snapshot would be super awesome. The solaris
alternate boot environments using zfs snapshots makes updating safe and
Chavdar Ivanov writes:
>> Perhaps true, but if the module scheme works for normal cases, little is
>> gained for NetBDS to distribute a kernel like that, and it adds
>> complexity thinking about licenses.
>
> Of course.
>
> I was thinking that if ZFS were in the kernel, it might be easier to
>
On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 21:07, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> Chavdar Ivanov writes:
>
> > On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 17:19, Martin Husemann wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 06:17:50PM +0200, Hauke Fath wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 16:46:46 +0200, Marc Baudoin wrote:
> >> > > ZFS has been
Chavdar Ivanov writes:
> On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 17:19, Martin Husemann wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 06:17:50PM +0200, Hauke Fath wrote:
>> > On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 16:46:46 +0200, Marc Baudoin wrote:
>> > > ZFS has been updated for 9.0_BETA.
>> >
>> > On the same topic, is there a
My $DAYJOB puts me in contact with ZFS on SmartOS (Joyent private cloud)
and a T4 Sparc with ZFS, so I was quite pleased to hear that ZFS on
NetBSD had made progress.
Nearly everything I tried with ZFS on NetBSD 9.0_BETA worked as
expected. I did the following:
1) Made and destroyed raidz and
On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 at 17:19, Martin Husemann wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 06:17:50PM +0200, Hauke Fath wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 16:46:46 +0200, Marc Baudoin wrote:
> > > ZFS has been updated for 9.0_BETA.
> >
> > On the same topic, is there a perspective for
> >
> > file-system ZFS
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 06:17:50PM +0200, Hauke Fath wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 16:46:46 +0200, Marc Baudoin wrote:
> > ZFS has been updated for 9.0_BETA.
>
> On the same topic, is there a perspective for
>
> file-system ZFS # Solaris ZFS
>
> (i.e. a monolithic, non-module
On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 16:46:46 +0200, Marc Baudoin wrote:
> ZFS has been updated for 9.0_BETA.
On the same topic, is there a perspective for
file-system ZFS # Solaris ZFS
(i.e. a monolithic, non-module kernel)?
Cheerio,
hauke
--
The ASCII Ribbon Campaign
mountpoint=/home z/home
> > >
> > > This is all on 9.99.something, BTW, but near enough to 9.0_BETA
> > >
> > > On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 10:55, Ron Georgia wrote:
> > >>
> > >> How did you move your home directory? Did you create /tank/home
> >
> > This is all on 9.99.something, BTW, but near enough to 9.0_BETA
> >
> > On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 10:55, Ron Georgia wrote:
> >>
> >> How did you move your home directory? Did you create /tank/home then
> >&g
55, Ron Georgia wrote:
>>
>> How did you move your home directory? Did you create /tank/home then symlink
>> the /home -> /tank/home?
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Alistair Crooks
>> Date: Thursday, August 8, 2019 at 11:53 AM
>> To: Ronald Georgia
>
ate: *Thursday, August 8, 2019 at 11:53 AM
> *To: *Ronald Georgia
> *Cc: *Marc Baudoin , NetBSD Users <
> netbsd-users@netbsd.org>
> *Subject: *Re: State of ZFS in 9.0_BETA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 07:52, Ronald Georgia wrote:
>
> S
How did you move your home directory? Did you create /tank/home then symlink
the /home -> /tank/home?
From: Alistair Crooks
Date: Thursday, August 8, 2019 at 11:53 AM
To: Ronald Georgia
Cc: Marc Baudoin , NetBSD Users
Subject: Re: State of ZFS in 9.0_BETA
On Thu, 8 Aug 2
On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 07:52, Ronald Georgia wrote:
> Same here. I have two 9BETA machines using zfs. Both have a mirrored pool
> of two disks. So far things seem to be working. This weekend I will be
> testing snapshots and send/receive.
>
> BTW, nice job with zfs.
>
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at
>Same here. I have two 9BETA machines using zfs. Both have a mirrored pool of
>two disks. So far things seem to be working. This weekend I will be testing
>snapshots and send/receive.
>BTW, nice job with zfs.
>>On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 10:47 AM Marc Baudoin
>> wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>ZFS has been
Same here. I have two 9BETA machines using zfs. Both have a mirrored pool
of two disks. So far things seem to be working. This weekend I will be
testing snapshots and send/receive.
BTW, nice job with zfs.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 10:47 AM Marc Baudoin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ZFS has been updated for
Hi,
ZFS has been updated for 9.0_BETA. I've tried it and it seems
usable (I couldn't make it work in 8.0 so it's a real progress).
Now I'd like to know what's its state in 9.0_BETA (still
experimental, quite stable, production ready --- might be too
early) and what's the goal for the future?
19 matches
Mail list logo
