On Feb 21, 4:30pm, Roy Marples wrote:
} On 21/02/2019 16:18, triaxx wrote:
} >
} > 3   2019/01/16 5:55:46 PM   info   udhcpd[1154]: sending OFFER
to
} > 255.255.255.255 with 192.168.0.11
} >
} >
} > 16:13:56.468169 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [none], proto
} > UDP
Le 2019-02-21 17:52, Roy Marples a écrit :
On 21/02/2019 16:45, triaxx wrote:
As least cisco respects -J but it doesn't fix the problem.
16:40:06.514754 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [none],
proto UDP (17), length 576)
192.168.0.1.bootps > 255.255.255.255.bootpc: [udp sum
On 21/02/2019 17:02, triaxx wrote:
Le 2019-02-21 17:52, Roy Marples a écrit :
On 21/02/2019 16:45, triaxx wrote:
As least cisco respects -J but it doesn't fix the problem.
16:40:06.514754 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [none],
proto UDP (17), length 576)
192.168.0.1.bootps
On 21/02/2019 16:45, triaxx wrote:
As least cisco respects -J but it doesn't fix the problem.
16:40:06.514754 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [none], proto
UDP (17), length 576)
192.168.0.1.bootps > 255.255.255.255.bootpc: [udp sum ok]
BOOTP/DHCP, Reply, length 548, xid
Le 2019-02-21 17:30, Roy Marples a écrit :
On 21/02/2019 16:18, triaxx wrote:
3 2019/01/16 5:55:46 PM info udhcpd[1154]: sending OFFER to
255.255.255.255 with 192.168.0.11
16:13:56.468169 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [none],
proto UDP (17), length 576)
Le 2019-02-21 17:07, Roy Marples a écrit :
On 21/02/2019 14:58, triaxx wrote:
Le 2019-01-18 17:54, Andy Ruhl a écrit :
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 2:09 AM Roy Marples wrote:
Hi Fred
On 18/01/2019 06:05, triaxx wrote:
> I experienced a dhcpcd that cannot connect to a Cisco gateway through a
>
On 21/02/2019 16:18, triaxx wrote:
3 2019/01/16 5:55:46 PM info udhcpd[1154]: sending OFFER to
255.255.255.255 with 192.168.0.11
16:13:56.468169 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [none], proto
UDP (17), length 576)
192.168.0.1.bootps > 192.168.0.11.bootpc: [udp sum
On 21/02/2019 14:58, triaxx wrote:
Le 2019-01-18 17:54, Andy Ruhl a écrit :
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 2:09 AM Roy Marples wrote:
Hi Fred
On 18/01/2019 06:05, triaxx wrote:
> I experienced a dhcpcd that cannot connect to a Cisco gateway
through a
> fresh NetBSD 8.0. I tried dhclient which
Le 2019-02-21 16:11, ignat...@cs.uni-bonn.de a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 03:58:33PM +0100, triaxx wrote:
tcpdump is like the observer of the Schrödinger's cat, it interfere in
measurement.
If I run tcpdump -i re0 "udp port 67 or 68" -w dhcpcd.pcap when
running
service -v dhcpcd
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 03:58:33PM +0100, triaxx wrote:
> tcpdump is like the observer of the Schrödinger's cat, it interfere in
> measurement.
>
> If I run tcpdump -i re0 "udp port 67 or 68" -w dhcpcd.pcap when running
> service -v dhcpcd restart, it works fine...
If you don't want it to
Le 2019-01-18 17:54, Andy Ruhl a écrit :
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 2:09 AM Roy Marples wrote:
Hi Fred
On 18/01/2019 06:05, triaxx wrote:
> I experienced a dhcpcd that cannot connect to a Cisco gateway through a
> fresh NetBSD 8.0. I tried dhclient which succeed.
>
> I didn't see relevant diff
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 2:09 AM Roy Marples wrote:
>
> Hi Fred
>
> On 18/01/2019 06:05, triaxx wrote:
> > I experienced a dhcpcd that cannot connect to a Cisco gateway through a
> > fresh NetBSD 8.0. I tried dhclient which succeed.
> >
> > I didn't see relevant diff between MAIN and netbsd-8.
> >
Hi Fred
On 18/01/2019 06:05, triaxx wrote:
I experienced a dhcpcd that cannot connect to a Cisco gateway through a
fresh NetBSD 8.0. I tried dhclient which succeed.
I didn't see relevant diff between MAIN and netbsd-8.
I would like to send a PR but I'm interesting to know what informations
Hi Roy,
I experienced a dhcpcd that cannot connect to a Cisco gateway through a
fresh NetBSD 8.0. I tried dhclient which succeed.
I didn't see relevant diff between MAIN and netbsd-8.
I would like to send a PR but I'm interesting to know what informations
could be relevant/helping.
Fred
14 matches
Mail list logo
