I believe the font size of the printed documentation is not specified...
I liked what Perry Metzger said about BSD vs 'other' licenses: "Instead of
worrying that people are going to steal my code, with BSD, I *know* they
will!"
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 10:55 AM r0ller wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
Hi All,
Thanks for the clarification!
Best regards,
r0ller
PS: If only the libc could be redistributed with 0BSD license, it would
have a big impact on the embedded use cases.
On 2023. 02. 10. 16:07, Greg Troxel wrote:
Julian Coleman writes:
If you want to redistribute libc, you need to
Julian Coleman writes:
> If you want to redistribute libc, you need to provide some way to display
> the licences for every libc source file as part of the documentation for
> the embedded device.
I think it is acceptable to ship the device with a paper license. There
is no requirement that
Hi all,
> The license is more or less per file/system and thus if you include a
> file you have to follow the license.
>
> A straightforward reading is that when you distribute a binary that you
> must include in accompanying documentation a copy of the license. It
> follows that distributing
r0ller writes:
> Hi All,
>
> I read on netbsd.org that netbsd uses the 2 clause BSD license where
> the 2nd clause says:
>
> Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
> notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
> documentation and/or other
Hi All,
I read on netbsd.org that netbsd uses the 2 clause BSD license where the
2nd clause says:
Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
documentation and/or other materials provided with the
