> On 18. Oct 2018, at 17:53, Glenn Holmer wrote:
>
> On 10/18/2018 10:22 AM, Daniel Warren wrote:
>> Much appreciated, I'd be happy to give the Symfony specification a try,
>> though I don't have a lot of experience with the framework.
>
> Assigned, give it a shot!
>
> Would anybody else
On 10/18/2018 10:22 AM, Daniel Warren wrote:
> Much appreciated, I'd be happy to give the Symfony specification a try,
> though I don't have a lot of experience with the framework.
Assigned, give it a shot!
Would anybody else like to volunteer for an assignment?
--
Glenn Holmer (Linux
Much appreciated, I'd be happy to give the Symfony specification a try,
though I don't have a lot of experience with the framework.
Kind regards,
Daniel Warren
On 18/10/2018 14:09, Glenn Holmer wrote:
On 10/18/2018 07:48 AM, Daniel Warren wrote:
If possible anything from PHP or Java Editor
On 10/18/2018 07:48 AM, Daniel Warren wrote:
> If possible anything from PHP or Java Editor tribes, maybe the Java Code
> Completion to begin with?
I've assigned code completion from Java Editor and Subversion from
version control. For PHP, can you do any of the frameworks like Smarty,
Symfony or
If possible anything from PHP or Java Editor tribes, maybe the Java Code
Completion to begin with?
Many thanks,
Daniel Warren
On 18/10/2018 13:27, Glenn Holmer wrote:
On 10/18/2018 06:12 AM, Daniel Warren wrote:
I'd also like to take the opportunity to say that I'd be happy with
having some
I think any assignment that is still at "0% completed" by EOB Monday (in
your timezone, Glenn), without an indication from the assigned person that
they're planning to work on it, should be reassigned -- and great that we
have several people available for that purpose.
At the same time, anyone is
On 10/18/2018 06:42 AM, Walter Nyland wrote:
> There are no items denoted as "Completed 0%" that have issues raised
> for them. Can those who have multiple items assigned to them all at
> "Completed 0%" respond and say what their intentions are? Are they
> suddenly going to do all their tasks at
No, I think if you're planning on doing them in the given time, then that's
perfect -- I think the concern expressed here is that if someone doesn't
think they're going to make it, there's plenty of others around willing to
pitch in. :-)
Gj
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 2:21 PM Holman Zsolt wrote:
>
On 10/18/2018 06:12 AM, Daniel Warren wrote:
> I'd also like to take the opportunity to say that I'd be happy with
> having some of the 0% completed tasks assigned to me if they have not
> been worked on at all.
Which tests would you like assignments for? I will set them up right away.
--
Glenn
There are no items denoted as "Completed 0%" that have issues raised for them.
Can those who have multiple items assigned to them all at "Completed 0%"
respond and say what their intentions are? Are they suddenly going to do all
their tasks at once? Or should we just removed all those names
I've noticed that some of the assigned tasks that have 0% completion but
have issues raised for them at specific stages (any of the 0% Java
editor tasks would be an example of this). It's my first time to be a
part of NetCAT too, so I'm not sure if anyone would be able to elaborate
on this at
Hello all,
On http://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/run/29/v/2, I see a lot
of "Completed 0%".
Are those people assigned to those specs going to do them -- or they should
simply release them to others. Some of us have finished ours, I see several
especially multiple assigned to one
12 matches
Mail list logo
