On 4/2/2020 11:20 PM, Ernie Rael wrote:
On 4/2/2020 8:44 AM, Glenn Holmer wrote:
After a profiling attempt, nbactions.xml has javafx: targets for run and
debug, while profile has org.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin. That's
like what run and debug originally had that didn't work, isn't it?
On 4/2/2020 8:44 AM, Glenn Holmer wrote:
On 4/2/20 9:45 AM, Ernie Rael wrote:
On 4/2/2020 7:25 AM, Glenn Holmer wrote:
On 4/2/20 9:08 AM, Ernie Rael wrote:
On 4/2/2020 6:31 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
I propose we keep things short and sweet for JavaFX in NetCAT 12.0:
https://netbeans
On 4/2/2020 8:44 AM, Glenn Holmer wrote:
On 4/2/20 9:45 AM, Ernie Rael wrote:
On 4/2/2020 7:25 AM, Glenn Holmer wrote:
On 4/2/20 9:08 AM, Ernie Rael wrote:
On 4/2/2020 6:31 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
I propose we keep things short and sweet for JavaFX in NetCAT 12.0:
https://netbeans
for JavaFX for NetCAT 12.0, unless
someone can put a test case together covering Gradle.
Gj
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 5:23 PM Scott Palmer wrote:
On Apr 2, 2020, at 10:09 AM, Ernie Rael wrote:
On 4/2/2020 6:31 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
Hi all,
I propose we keep things short and sweet for JavaFX
On 4/2/20 9:45 AM, Ernie Rael wrote:
> On 4/2/2020 7:25 AM, Glenn Holmer wrote:
>> On 4/2/20 9:08 AM, Ernie Rael wrote:
>>> On 4/2/2020 6:31 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>>>> I propose we keep things short and sweet for JavaFX in NetCAT 12.0:
>>>>
>>
Not supported yet at this stage, i.e., no project template for it in any
case -- I suggest we focus on Maven for JavaFX for NetCAT 12.0, unless
someone can put a test case together covering Gradle.
Gj
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 5:23 PM Scott Palmer wrote:
>
> > On Apr 2, 2020, at 10:09
> On Apr 2, 2020, at 10:09 AM, Ernie Rael wrote:
>
> On 4/2/2020 6:31 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I propose we keep things short and sweet for JavaFX in NetCAT 12.0:
>>
>> https://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/specific
On 4/2/2020 7:25 AM, Glenn Holmer wrote:
On 4/2/20 9:08 AM, Ernie Rael wrote:
On 4/2/2020 6:31 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
I propose we keep things short and sweet for JavaFX in NetCAT 12.0:
https://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/specification/452
There are four cases: IDE-JDK
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 8:31 AM Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> I propose we keep things short and sweet for JavaFX in NetCAT 12.0:
>
> https://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/specification/452
>
> What do we think about the above -- now that we have Ernie's gr
On 4/2/20 9:08 AM, Ernie Rael wrote:
> On 4/2/2020 6:31 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>> I propose we keep things short and sweet for JavaFX in NetCAT 12.0:
>>
>> https://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/specification/452
> There are four cases: IDE-JDK-ve
On 4/2/2020 6:31 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
Hi all,
I propose we keep things short and sweet for JavaFX in NetCAT 12.0:
https://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/specification/452
What do we think about the above -- now that we have Ernie's great work
done on the OpenJFX
Hi all,
I propose we keep things short and sweet for JavaFX in NetCAT 12.0:
https://netbeans-vm.apache.org/synergy/client/app/#/specification/452
What do we think about the above -- now that we have Ernie's great work
done on the OpenJFX archetypes, in 12.0 Beta 2, the running and debugging
12 matches
Mail list logo