Re: [Bonding-devel] [PATCH] 2.6.12 Ethernet bridge over bonding interfaces

2005-07-06 Thread maeda-sxb
Hi. I wonder if it would be better to add a dev-priv_flags for, e.g., IFF_SLAVE_INACTIVE or the like, set that when a slave is marked inactive, and clear it when the slave becomes active (similarly to how NOARP is done today). The rationale for this is that NOARP can be changed by a

Re: help on tg3 polling extension

2005-07-06 Thread Qinghua(Kevin) Ye
Yes, It wastes CPU cycles if there is other process running. However, as it being a dedicated router, it should not be a problem. The process of packets is the only task it is supposed to do. Compared to NAPI, click polling will disable Nic interrupts during its operation, even there is

Re: help on tg3 polling extension

2005-07-06 Thread David S. Miller
From: Qinghua(Kevin) Ye [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 11:36:40 -0600 Compared to NAPI, click polling will disable Nic interrupts during its operation, even there is no any packets in the rx buffer. This destroys latency if you only recheck the RX buffer using timer

[PATCH 0/2] Add Networking menu and clean up net/Kconfig

2005-07-06 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Based on patch originally submitted by Randy Dunlap I have made two patches that modify the Kconfig bits for net/. First patch create a new top-level menu just above Device Drivers named Networking. Hereby one no longer has to look deep in Device Drivers to find IPv6 for example. Sample menu

Re: help on tg3 polling extension

2005-07-06 Thread David S. Miller
From: Qinghua(Kevin) Ye [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 14:12:29 -0600 Yes, you are right. Click acturally will release the CPU to OS at interval. Other processes will be responded at this interval. It is not Click's right to make this kind of decision, that is what we have the process

Re: help on tg3 polling extension

2005-07-06 Thread Qinghua(Kevin) Ye
In my SMP platform, there is no other processes running. The usage of CPUs are 100% and 0%. How could I make Nic interrupts not arrive at only one CPU, or balance the interrupt between two CPUs? This doesn't work. If you try to split up the work for one network card amongst multiple