Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6] Remove Prism II support from Orinoco

2006-06-15 Thread Faidon Liambotis
Hi, Pavel Roskin wrote: The patch in question was never submitted to the orinoco mailing list. I believe any such changes should be discussed by people using the driver and participating in its development. It's not some minor change or API update. I'm sorry for not submitting/CCing this to

Re: [patch] ipv4: fix lock usage in udp_ioctl

2006-06-15 Thread Heiko Carstens
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 08:28:07AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is bogus. These two locks belong to two different queues and they never intersect. yeah - qeth does its own skb-queue management here, and it's done in an irq-safe manner.

[PATCH 1/2] Runtime configuration of HTB's HYSTERESIS option (kernel)

2006-06-15 Thread Russell Stuart
The HTB qdisc has a compile time option, HTB_HYSTERESIS, that trades accuracy of traffic classification for CPU time. These patches change hysteresis to be a runtime option under the control of tc. The effects of HYSTERESIS on HTB's accuracy are significant (see chapter 7, section 7.3.1, pp

[PATCH 2/2] Runtime configuration of HTB's HYSTERESIS option (userspace)

2006-06-15 Thread Russell Stuart
The HTB qdisc has a compile time option, HTB_HYSTERESIS, that trades accuracy of traffic classification for CPU time. These patches change hysteresis to be a runtime option under the control of tc. The effects of HYSTERESIS on HTB's accuracy are significant (see chapter 7, section 7.3.1, pp

[PATCH 0/2] Runtime configuration of HTB's HYSTERESIS option

2006-06-15 Thread Russell Stuart
The HTB qdisc has a compile time option, HTB_HYSTERESIS, that trades accuracy of traffic classification for CPU time. These patches change hysteresis to be a runtime option under the control of tc. The effects of HYSTERESIS on HTB's accuracy are significant (see chapter 7, section 7.3.1, pp

Re: driver for pptp

2006-06-15 Thread xeb
Thanks for critique. Please read Documentation/SubmittingPatches (and CodingStyle) and submit your kernel patch to netdev. OK. 1) why wasn't it possible to use the PPPoX infrastructure of the kernel which is already being used by PPPoE ? Or at least model it somehow similar to the existing

Re: [patch] ipv4: fix lock usage in udp_ioctl

2006-06-15 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Heiko Carstens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about the patch below? The warning goes away and I assume tmp_list needs lockdep_reinit_key too, since it should have the same locking rules as the rest of qeth's skb-queue management. yeah, looks good. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this

Re: [Ubuntu PATCH] Broadcom wireless patch, PCIE/Mactel support

2006-06-15 Thread Stefano Brivio
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 16:22:39 -0700 Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Broadcom wireless patch, PCIE/Mactel support http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/bcollins/ubuntu-dapper.git;a=commitdiff;h=1373a8487e911b5ee204f4422ddea00929c8a4cc

Re: [PATCH 1/2] e1000: fix netpoll with NAPI

2006-06-15 Thread John W. Linville
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 04:44:56PM -0700, Mitch Williams wrote: One of our engineers (on the I/O AT team) has been tasked with modifying the Linux kernel to properly support multiple hardware queues (both TX and RX). We'll make sure that he looks at the netpoll interface as part of that

Re: [PATCH 2/2] NET: Accurate packet scheduling for ATM/ADSL (userspace)

2006-06-15 Thread jamal
On Thu, 2006-15-06 at 10:47 +1000, Russell Stuart wrote: On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 11:57 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: The other problem I see with this code is it is very tightly tied to ATM cell sizes, not to solving the generic question of packetisation. Others have made this point also. I can't

Re: [PATCH 0/2] NET: Accurate packet scheduling for ATM/ADSL

2006-06-15 Thread jamal
On Wed, 2006-14-06 at 14:55 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 08:06 -0400, jamal wrote: - Have you tried to do a long-lived session such as a large FTP and seen how far off the deviation was? That would provide some interesting data point. The deviation can be

SO_REUSEPORT and multicasting

2006-06-15 Thread Jason
Hello, I wrote a program that uses multicasting to send data. It works great on HP-UX but does not work on Fedora Core 5. I emailed the fedora list but they were of little to no help. Does the kernel support SO_REUSEPORT? If so can anyone give me some suggestions why my program does not

Re: [PATCH] Make in-kernel hostap less annoying

2006-06-15 Thread Dan Williams
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 20:41 -0700, Jouni Malinen wrote: On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 03:13:02PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote: Most user don't want their kern.log/dmesg filled with debugging gibberish, and could turn it on if prompted. ( Example: wifi0: TXEXC - status=0x0004 ([Discon])

Re: [Ubuntu PATCH] Broadcom wireless patch, PCIE/Mactel support

2006-06-15 Thread Michael Buesch
On Thursday 15 June 2006 13:32, Stefano Brivio wrote: On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 16:22:39 -0700 Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Broadcom wireless patch, PCIE/Mactel support

RE: [openib-general] [PATCH v2 1/7] AMSO1100 Low Level Driver.

2006-06-15 Thread Steve Wise
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 20:35 -0500, Bob Sharp wrote: +void c2_ae_event(struct c2_dev *c2dev, u32 mq_index) +{ + snip + case C2_RES_IND_EP:{ + + struct c2wr_ae_connection_request *req = + wr-ae.ae_connection_request; + struct iw_cm_id *cm_id

RE: [openib-general] [PATCH v2 1/7] AMSO1100 Low Level Driver.

2006-06-15 Thread Steve Wise
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 08:41 -0500, Steve Wise wrote: On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 20:35 -0500, Bob Sharp wrote: +void c2_ae_event(struct c2_dev *c2dev, u32 mq_index) +{ + snip + case C2_RES_IND_EP:{ + + struct c2wr_ae_connection_request *req = +

Re: [Ubuntu PATCH] Broadcom wireless patch, PCIE/Mactel support

2006-06-15 Thread Randy Dunlap
Stefano Brivio wrote: On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 16:22:39 -0700 Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Broadcom wireless patch, PCIE/Mactel support

[BUG] HTB panic

2006-06-15 Thread Stephen Hemminger
Could some one who has used HTB fix this bug? Looks like a simple use after free. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6681 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: [PATCH 5/5] bcm43xx-d80211: fix sending of fragments

2006-06-15 Thread Michael Buesch
On Monday 12 June 2006 21:35, Michael Buesch wrote: On Monday 12 June 2006 21:16, Jiri Benc wrote: This makes fragmentation work with bcm43xx. Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] The other patch will get my sign-off tomorrow (I

Re: [PATCH] s2io: netpoll support

2006-06-15 Thread Brian Haley
This adds netpoll support for things like netconsole/kgdboe to the s2io 10GbE driver. Signed-off-by: Brian Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff --git a/drivers/net/s2io.c b/drivers/net/s2io.c index 79208f4..f2b8dba 100644 --- a/drivers/net/s2io.c +++ b/drivers/net/s2io.c @@ -2575,6 +2575,50 @@ no_rx:

Suspending 802.11 drivers

2006-06-15 Thread Michael Buesch
Hi, I am currently thinking about the best way to correctly implement PM suspending for wireless drivers. Currently, the 802.11 stack is not suspend aware (if I talk about stack here, I mostly mean devicescape). For example, if we suspend the bcm43xx driver, we don't notify the stack before doing

Please pull 'upstream' branch of wireless-2.6

2006-06-15 Thread John W. Linville
The following changes since commit 76df73ff90e99681a99e457aec4cfe0a240b7982: John W. Linville: Merge branch 'from-linus' into upstream are found in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-2.6.git upstream Jiri Slaby: pci: bcm43xx

Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc6] Remove Prism II support from Orinoco

2006-06-15 Thread John W. Linville
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 08:15:10AM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote: Regarding the disabling of IDs, I could prepare a patch for orinoco_cs that would disable Prism2 support via a configuration option. Would that be helpful/acceptable? I'm going to 'officially' drop this patch, while you and

Re: [PATCH 5/5] bcm43xx-d80211: fix sending of fragments

2006-06-15 Thread Jiri Benc
Thu, 15 Jun 2006 18:55:11 +0200, Michael Buesch pise: Please also merge the other patch. It is too hard to figure out the dependencies for me now. So simply merge it and I will submit a fixup patch later, after you pushed it out. The Subject was: [incomplete 2/5] bcm43xx-d80211: per-queue TX

Re: PATCHv3 2.6.17-rc5 tulip free_irq() called too late

2006-06-15 Thread Francois Romieu
Grant Grundler [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [shared irq] I thought we've worked through that already: http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg05902.html Patch v3 takes care of that problem. The first step in the sequence is to mask IRQs on the tulip. The neighbor device sharing the IRQ will not

Re: [PATCH 5/5] bcm43xx-d80211: fix sending of fragments

2006-06-15 Thread Michael Buesch
On Thursday 15 June 2006 22:27, Jiri Benc wrote: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 18:55:11 +0200, Michael Buesch pise: Please also merge the other patch. It is too hard to figure out the dependencies for me now. So simply merge it and I will submit a fixup patch later, after you pushed it out. The

Re: [PATCH 1/2] e1000: fix netpoll with NAPI

2006-06-15 Thread Mitch Williams
Andy Grover [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the guy. I'm not sure when he'll be working on this; it's somewhere in his TODO pile. On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, John W. Linville wrote: On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 04:44:56PM -0700, Mitch Williams wrote: One of our engineers (on the I/O AT team) has been tasked with

Re: [patch] workaround zd1201 interference problem

2006-06-15 Thread John W. Linville
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 12:38:04AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: Which operation is the one which stops the interference, the enable or the disable? Disable alone was not enough to stop interference. I'm going to drop this patch for now, in the hopes that with Daniel's ZyDas contacts you

Re: [patch] workaround zd1201 interference problem

2006-06-15 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Which operation is the one which stops the interference, the enable or the disable? Disable alone was not enough to stop interference. I'm going to drop this patch for now, in the hopes that with Daniel's ZyDas contacts you can devise a more palatable solution. I'd actually

Re: Suspending 802.11 drivers

2006-06-15 Thread Ivo van Doorn
Hi, I am currently thinking about the best way to correctly implement PM suspending for wireless drivers. Currently, the 802.11 stack is not suspend aware (if I talk about stack here, I mostly mean devicescape). For example, if we suspend the bcm43xx driver, we don't notify the stack before

Re: Suspending 802.11 drivers

2006-06-15 Thread Michael Buesch
On Thursday 15 June 2006 22:12, Florian Fainelli wrote: Hello Michael, I think these are really interesting functions. Currently I scripted a bit to do module unloading/loading on suspend/resume requests plus supplicant context saving and restart. Of course, if the driver is able to

Re: [patch] workaround zd1201 interference problem

2006-06-15 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Pavel Machek wrote: if you plug zd1201 into USB, it starts jamming radio, immediately. Enable/disable, or iwlist wlan0 scan, or basically any operation unjams the radio. This patch works it around: Can we be any more specific? At which precise point does the interference start? Does

Re: [2/2] [BRIDGE]: Add support for NETIF_F_HW_CSUM devices

2006-06-15 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:25:43 +1000 Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi: [BRIDGE]: Add support for NETIF_F_HW_CSUM devices As it is the bridge will only ever declare NETIF_F_IP_CSUM even if all its constituent devices support NETIF_F_HW_CSUM. This patch fixes this by supporting the

What's new in wireless-dev?

2006-06-15 Thread John W. Linville
The following changes since commit bff7c0afa5a40acf518ae9fbf67e5f93ff9107bc: John W. Linville: Merge branch 'from-linus' are found in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-dev.git Jiri Benc: d80211: deinit sysfs in case of an

Pull request for 'upstream' branch

2006-06-15 Thread Francois Romieu
Please pull from branch 'upstream' to get the change below: git://electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com/home/romieu/linux-2.6.git Patch applies both to jeff#upstream and jeff#upstream-fixes Shortlog Pedro Alejandro López-Valencia: sundance: PCI ID for ip100a Patch - diff --git

Re: skge wake on lan failing

2006-06-15 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 22:10:26 +0100 Sitsofe Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, We have a bunch of PCI D-Link System Inc DGE-530T Gigabit Ethernet cards which use the skge driver. However, the link light for a given card goes off at the switch during a suspend to ram or power down even

RE: [openib-general] [PATCH v2 1/7] AMSO1100 Low Level Driver.

2006-06-15 Thread Caitlin Bestler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 08:41 -0500, Steve Wise wrote: On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 20:35 -0500, Bob Sharp wrote: +void c2_ae_event(struct c2_dev *c2dev, u32 mq_index) { + snip + case C2_RES_IND_EP:{ + + struct c2wr_ae_connection_request *req = +

RE: [openib-general] [PATCH v2 1/7] AMSO1100 Low Level Driver.

2006-06-15 Thread Steve Wise
Now that I've looked more into this, I'm not sure there's a simple way for the IWCM to copy the pdata on the upcall. Currently, the IWCM's event upcall, cm_event_handler(), simply queues the work for processing on a workqueue thread. So there's no per-event logic at all there. Lemme

Re: SO_REUSEPORT and multicasting

2006-06-15 Thread David Stevens
If you can send me (or post) the program, I may be able to help. +-DLS - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH 4/6][SCTP]: Don't do CRC32C checksum over loopback.

2006-06-15 Thread Sridhar Samudrala
[SCTP]: Don't do CRC32C checksum over loopback. Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- net/sctp/input.c |3 ++- net/sctp/output.c | 48 +++- 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/sctp/input.c

[PATCH 6/6][SCTP]: Fix persistent slowdown in sctp when a gap ack consumes rx buffer.

2006-06-15 Thread Sridhar Samudrala
[SCTP]: Fix persistent slowdown in sctp when a gap ack consumes rx buffer. In the event that our entire receive buffer is full with a series of chunks that represent a single gap-ack, and then we accept a chunk (or chunks) that fill in the gap between the ctsn and the first gap, we renege chunks

[PATCH 2/6][SCTP]: Reject sctp packets with broadcast addresses.

2006-06-15 Thread Sridhar Samudrala
[SCTP]: Reject sctp packets with broadcast addresses. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- include/net/sctp/structs.h |3 ++- net/sctp/input.c |3 ++- net/sctp/ipv6.c|6 --

[PATCH 1/6][SCTP]: Limit association max_retrans setting in setsockopt

2006-06-15 Thread Sridhar Samudrala
Dave, Please apply the following 6 SCTP patches to 2.6 tree. Thanks Sridhar - [SCTP]: Limit association max_retrans setting in setsockopt. When using ASSOCINFO socket option, we need to limit the number of maximum association

[PATCH 3/6][SCTP] Reset rtt_in_progress for the chunk when processing its sack.

2006-06-15 Thread Sridhar Samudrala
[SCTP] Reset rtt_in_progress for the chunk when processing its sack. Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- include/net/sctp/sctp.h |2 +- net/sctp/outqueue.c |1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff

[PATCH 5/6][SCTP]: Send only 1 window update SACK per message.

2006-06-15 Thread Sridhar Samudrala
[SCTP]: Send only 1 window update SACK per message. Right now, every time we increase our rwnd by more then MTU bytes, we trigger a SACK. When processing large messages, this will generate a SACK for almost every other SCTP fragment. However since we are freeing the entire message at the same

Question: Virtual device error return is mangled

2006-06-15 Thread Mark Huth
Why does net/core/dev.c: dev_queue_transmit not pass back the actual status from hard_start_xmit in the case of a virtual device, and why is an error return considered a critical kernel error? ie why: if (!dev-hard_start_xmit(skb, dev)) { ... rc = -ENETDOWN;

Re: [Ubuntu PATCH] Broadcom wireless patch, PCIE/Mactel support

2006-06-15 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 16:22 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: From: Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Broadcom wireless patch, PCIE/Mactel support http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/bcollins/ubuntu-dapper.git;a=commitdiff;h=1373a8487e911b5ee204f4422ddea00929c8a4cc This patch adds

Re: [RFC] [patch 0/6] [Network namespace] introduction

2006-06-15 Thread Eric W. Biederman
My apologies for not looking at this earlier I had an email hickup so I'm having to recreate the context from email archives, and you didn't copy me. Have you seen my previous work in this direction? I know I had a much much more complete implementation. The only part I had not completed was

Re: [Ubuntu PATCH] Broadcom wireless patch, PCIE/Mactel support

2006-06-15 Thread Randy Dunlap
Arjan van de Ven wrote: On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 16:22 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: From: Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Broadcom wireless patch, PCIE/Mactel support http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/bcollins/ubuntu-dapper.git;a=commitdiff;h=1373a8487e911b5ee204f4422ddea00929c8a4cc

Re: PATCHv3 2.6.17-rc5 tulip free_irq() called too late

2006-06-15 Thread Grant Grundler
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 10:30:17PM +0200, Francois Romieu wrote: Afaik free_irq() on a shared irq does not touch the hardware and irqs are anything but synchronous. If free_irq() is issued before the device is idle and its irq are not acked, it's wrong. Correct. Before calling free_irq(),