On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:02:46 -0700 (PDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9031
Summary: TPC window is to cautious on send
Product: Networking
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: Any
Platform: All
Hello,
This is a trivial typo correction in net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c which
hunted my eye...
Regards,
Ian Brown
Signed-off-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.23-rc5-clean/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c 2007-09-01
09:08:24.0 +0300
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc5/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 02:14:44PM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
Updated and split version at:
http://coderock.org/tmp/fec-v3rc1/
I'll repost to lists once I run-test them.
When applying those patches, the build did die with :
ERROR: phy_mii_ioctl [drivers/net/fec_mpc52xx/fec_mpc52xx.ko]
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 05:10:00PM -0400, jamal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sun, 2007-16-09 at 16:52 -0400, jamal wrote:
What i should say is
if i grabbed the lock explicitly without disabling irqs it wont be much
different than what is done today and should always work.
No?
And to
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
-/* Check for lost IRQ once a second */
+static void sky2_rx_check(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ struct sky2_port *sky2 = netdev_priv(dev);
+ struct sky2_hw *hw = sky2-hw;
+ unsigned port = sky2-port;
+ unsigned rxq =
I proposed introducing a list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse
macro to be used in setup_net() when unrolling the failed
-init callback.
Here is the macro and some more cleanup in the setup_net() itself
to remove one variable from the stack :) Minor, but the code
looks nicer.
Signed-off-by: Pavel
On 12/23/-28158 08:59 PM, Auke Kok wrote:
This incorporates the new napi_struct changes into e1000e. Included
bugfix for ifdown hang from Krishna Kumar for e1000.
Disabling polling is no longer needed at init time, so remove
napi_disable() call from _probe().
This also fixes an endless
Michael Chan schrieb:
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 10:14 +0200, Ingo Oeser wrote:
Is it enough to parse the first number in the firmware via simple_strtoul()?
No, it's not. We need to check the number after the '.' and possibly an
alphabet at the end as well. Worse yet, the version may be
This patch adds entries in the CREDITS and MAINTAINERS file for CAN.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Urs Thuermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
CREDITS | 16
MAINTAINERS |9 +
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
Index:
Hello Dave,
this is the sixth post of the patch series that adds the PF_CAN
protocol family for the Controller Area Network.
Since our last post we have changed the following:
* Update code to work with namespaces in net-2.6.24.
* Remove SET_MODULE_OWNER() from vcan.
The changes in try #5
This patch adds a protocol/address family number, ARP hardware type,
ethernet packet type, and a line discipline number for the SocketCAN
implementation.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Urs Thuermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/linux/if_arp.h |1 +
This patch adds the virtual CAN bus (vcan) network driver.
The vcan device is just a loopback device for CAN frames, no
real CAN hardware is involved.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Urs Thuermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/net/Makefile |1
This patch adds the CAN raw protocol.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Urs Thuermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/linux/can/raw.h | 31 +
net/can/Kconfig | 26 +
net/can/Makefile|3
net/can/raw.c | 767
This patch adds documentation for the PF_CAN protocol family.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Urs Thuermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Documentation/networking/00-INDEX |2
Documentation/networking/can.txt | 635 ++
2 files
This patch adds the CAN broadcast manager (bcm) protocol.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Urs Thuermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/linux/can/bcm.h | 65 +
net/can/Kconfig | 28
net/can/Makefile|3
net/can/bcm.c | 1762
On Sun, 2007-16-09 at 20:13 -0700, David Miller wrote:
What Herbert and I want to do is basically turn on TSO for
devices that can't do it in hardware, and rely upon the GSO
framework to do the segmenting in software right before we
hit the device.
Sensible.
This only makes sense for
On Mon, 2007-17-09 at 14:27 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
How many cpu collisions you are seeing?
On 4 CPUs which were always transmitting very few - there was contention
in the range of 100 per million attempts.
Note: it doesnt matter that 4 cpus were busy, this lock is contended at
max
Pavel Emelyanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I proposed introducing a list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse
macro to be used in setup_net() when unrolling the failed
-init callback.
Here is the macro and some more cleanup in the setup_net() itself
to remove one variable from the stack :) Minor,
David Miller wrote:
From: Vlad Yasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:34:35 -0400
Thanks to Sridhar Samudral and Paul McKenney for all the help and comments.
I think this is a final version, unless someone else can spot more problems.
I've ran this under heavy load and it the
This patch allows to dynamically allocate the loopback
like an usual network device.
This global static variable loopback_dev has been replaced by a
netdev pointer and the init function does the usual allocation,
initialization and registering of the loopback.
This patchset is splitted in two
From: Daniel Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doing this makes loopback.c a better example of how to do a
simple network device, and it removes the special case
single static allocation of a struct net_device, hopefully
making maintenance easier.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Daniel Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch replaces all occurences to the static variable
loopback_dev to a pointer loopback_dev. That provides the
mindless, trivial, uninteressting change part for the dynamic
allocation for the loopback.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
Pavel if you are going down this route. Could you look at
cleanup_net as well. The reverse walk there could probably
benefit from being list_for_each_entry_reverse.
Oh! Thanks a lot ;) Here's the new patch.
Log:
I proposed introducing a list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse
macro to
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:51:33PM -0400, Andrew James Wade wrote:
I have an Oops that may be related:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
0025
printing eip: c037d81b *pde =
Oops: [#1]
last sysfs file:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 09:03:58AM -0400, jamal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Did I understand you right, that you replaced trylock with lock and
thus removed collision handling and got better results?
Yes, a small one with the 4 CPUs and no irq binding. Note that in the
test cases i run, the
I have also seen this OOPS on e1000 card. So, looks like driver independent.
By the way, this one has been triggered in a semi-stable way by the
'git-pull'
Regards,
Den
Dhaval Giani wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:51:33PM -0400, Andrew James Wade wrote:
I have an Oops that may be
Hi all!
I've just released my first beta of Linux Network Load Balancing
it's a driver (+ userland tool) to make decentered load balancing
clusters.
I hope someone is interested in the project and could do some testing
in decent environments (I've just done some laboratory test in a 3
The name struct net is too generic. There already were
some people who wanted to have some better name (for
easier grep for example). I propose the struct netns one.
The patch is (already) huge (sorry), but it's nothing but
sed -e s/struct net\/struct netns/g
If this name is bad as well, let's
Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
The name struct net is too generic. There already were
some people who wanted to have some better name (for
easier grep for example). I propose the struct netns one.
The patch is (already) huge (sorry), but it's nothing but
sed -e s/struct net\/struct netns/g
If this
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
Hi Steve.
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 10:56:46AM -0500, Steve Wise ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The iWARP driver must translate all listens on address 0.0.0.0 to the
set of rdma-only ip addresses for the device in question. This prevents
incoming connect requests to the
Daniel Lezcano wrote:
Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
The name struct net is too generic. There already were
some people who wanted to have some better name (for
easier grep for example). I propose the struct netns one.
The patch is (already) huge (sorry), but it's nothing but
sed -e s/struct
+addr = kmalloc(sizeof *addr, GFP_KERNEL);
As a small nitpick: this wants to be sizeof(struct in_ifaddr)
See chapter 14 of CodingStyle document. kmalloc(sizeof *addr... is correct.
- Sean
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 09:09:06AM -0700, Sean Hefty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
+addr = kmalloc(sizeof *addr, GFP_KERNEL);
As a small nitpick: this wants to be sizeof(struct in_ifaddr)
See chapter 14 of CodingStyle document. kmalloc(sizeof *addr... is correct.
Come on, do not start a
From: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:10:40 -0400
David Miller wrote:
We've touched so much in net-2.6.24 that we really should be auditing
the thing and fixing any bugs that have been added. If you're bored
and looking for something to do, pick an odd NAPI driver
Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 12/23/-28158 08:59 PM, Auke Kok wrote:
This incorporates the new napi_struct changes into e1000e. Included
bugfix for ifdown hang from Krishna Kumar for e1000.
Disabling polling is no longer needed at init time, so remove
napi_disable() call from _probe().
This also
From: jamal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 08:51:40 -0400
On Sun, 2007-16-09 at 20:13 -0700, David Miller wrote:
This only makes sense for devices which can 1) scatter-gather
and 2) checksum on transmit.
If you have knowledge there are enough descriptors in the driver to
From: Pavel Emelyanov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:46:07 +0400
The name struct net is too generic. There already were
some people who wanted to have some better name (for
easier grep for example). I propose the struct netns one.
I don't see any reason to change the name, 'net'
To me it suggests that your speed is not full-duplex. Check `ethtool eth0`
output
and see if your link is full duplex or not. also check previous kernel
messages
and see what the e1000 driver posted there for link speed messages (as in
e1000:
Link is UP speed XXX duplex YYY)
from dmesg:
From: David Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 22:24:27 -0600
Dave,
Thanks. That rev2 was for v6-only; I didn't see anythng about the
v4 patch (below, in case it fell through the cracks).
It did fall through the cracks, I've applied this and will
push unless some serious
From: Ian Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:50:15 +0200
Hello,
This is a trivial typo correction in net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c which
hunted my eye...
Regards,
Ian Brown
Signed-off-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your mail client word-wrapped the patch so it doesn't apply
cleanly,
L F wrote:
To me it suggests that your speed is not full-duplex. Check `ethtool eth0`
output
and see if your link is full duplex or not. also check previous kernel
messages
and see what the e1000 driver posted there for link speed messages (as in
e1000:
Link is UP speed XXX duplex YYY)
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 23:43:40 -0700
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:02:46 -0700 (PDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9031
Summary: TPC window is to cautious on send
Product: Networking
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:45:11 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Daniel Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doing this makes loopback.c a better example of how to do a
simple network device, and it removes the special case
single static allocation of a struct net_device, hopefully
making
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 12:03:28 +0200 Urs Thuermann wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for all of this informative documentation.
I have some typo/spello corrections below.
This patch adds documentation for the PF_CAN protocol family.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Urs
Kok, Auke wrote:
L F wrote:
tx_deferred_ok: 486
this one I wonder about, and might cause delays, I'll have to look
up what it exactly could implicate though.
Please do and let me know. samba 3.0.26 helped, but the issue is
still there.
ok, from the spec: tx_deferred_ok is what is in the
I'm rebasing a 500 patch tree which has tons of merge conflicts today,
so I lack the time to answer your question.
Suffice it to say you could do a little bit of legwork to figure out
the answer by researching inet_csk_reqsk_queue_is_full() and
determining what sets the state tested by that
David Miller wrote:
From: Rick Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:42:18 -0700
I've been digging around to see about inducing /proc/net/tcp to show
some interesting things for listen sockets (eg backlog depth, its max,
and dropped connection requests). While there I've noticed
Since small things fall more easily through cracks I thought I'd make
sure it didn't get lost?
rick jones
Rick Jones wrote:
Return some useful information such as the maximum listen backlog and the
current listen backlog in the tcp_info structure and have that match what
one can see in
Rick Jones wrote:
Kok, Auke wrote:
L F wrote:
tx_deferred_ok: 486
this one I wonder about, and might cause delays, I'll have to look
up what it exactly could implicate though.
Please do and let me know. samba 3.0.26 helped, but the issue is
still there.
ok, from the spec:
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:45:11 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Daniel Lezcano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doing this makes loopback.c a better example of how to do a
simple network device, and it removes the special case
single static allocation of a struct net_device,
On 9/17/07, Kok, Auke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The statistic we were looking at _will_ increase when running in half duplex,
but if it increases when running in full duplex might indicate a hardware
failure. Probably you have fixed the issue with the CAT6 cable.
Uhm, 'fixed' may be premature: I
From: Rick Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:38:09 -0700
Since small things fall more easily through cracks I thought I'd make
sure it didn't get lost?
Reposting the patch is often better because if you quote it
then the copy I have has to be meticuliously edited to remove
the
On 09/17/2007 06:29 PM, Kok, Auke wrote:
Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 12/23/-28158 08:59 PM, Auke Kok wrote:
This incorporates the new napi_struct changes into e1000e. Included
bugfix for ifdown hang from Krishna Kumar for e1000.
Disabling polling is no longer needed at init time, so remove
Return some useful information such as the maximum listen backlog and the
current listen backlog in the tcp_info structure and have that match what
one can see in /proc/net/tcp, /proc/net/tcp6, and INET_DIAG_INFO.
Signed-off-by: Rick Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet [EMAIL
David Miller wrote:
From: Rick Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 11:38:09 -0700
Since small things fall more easily through cracks I thought I'd make
sure it didn't get lost?
Reposting the patch is often better because if you quote it
then the copy I have has to be
Any reason you're overloading tcpi_unacked and tcpi_sacked? It seems
that setting idiag_rqueue and idiag_wqueue are sufficient.
-John
Rick Jones wrote:
Return some useful information such as the maximum listen backlog and the
current listen backlog in the tcp_info structure and have that
Export phy_mii_ioctl, so network drivers can use it when built
as modules too.
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On 17/09/07 11:53 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 02:14:44PM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
Updated and split version at:
John Heffner wrote:
Any reason you're overloading tcpi_unacked and tcpi_sacked? It seems
that setting idiag_rqueue and idiag_wqueue are sufficient.
Different fields for different structures. The tcp_info struct doesn't
have the idiag_mumble, so to get the two values shown in /proc/net/tcp
Hi Randy,
Thanks for all of this informative documentation.
I have some typo/spello corrections below.
Thank you very much. I have applied all your suggestions to our SVN
repository. To reduce traffic on the list, I only repeat the pointer
to the repository:
Rick Jones wrote:
John Heffner wrote:
Any reason you're overloading tcpi_unacked and tcpi_sacked? It seems
that setting idiag_rqueue and idiag_wqueue are sufficient.
Different fields for different structures. The tcp_info struct doesn't
have the idiag_mumble, so to get the two values
Urs,
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 22:22 +0200, Urs Thuermann wrote:
Thank you very much. I have applied all your suggestions to our SVN
repository. To reduce traffic on the list, I only repeat the pointer
to the repository:
Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please do, having the patch in mail makes it easier to review and to
comment.
OK, here it is:
This patch adds documentation for the PF_CAN protocol family.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Urs Thuermann [EMAIL
L F wrote:
On 9/17/07, Kok, Auke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The statistic we were looking at _will_ increase when running in
half duplex, but if it increases when running in full duplex might
indicate a hardware failure. Probably you have fixed the issue with
the CAT6 cable.
Uhm, 'fixed' may
Denis V. Lunev wrote:
I have also seen this OOPS on e1000 card. So, looks like driver independent.
By the way, this one has been triggered in a semi-stable way by the
'git-pull'
Do you have this patch:
commit 5c127c58ae9bf196d787815b1bd6b0aec5aee816
Author: David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Update the decode of sky2 registers.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- a/marvell.c 2007-09-17 14:03:08.0 -0700
+++ b/marvell.c 2007-09-17 14:05:44.0 -0700
@@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ static void dump_mac(const u8 *r)
case 0xb4: printf(Yukon-2 EC Ultra);
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:46:38 +0530
Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kernel Bug is hit with 2.6.23-rc4-mm1 kernel on ppc64 machine.
kernel BUG at include/linux/netdevice.h:339!
(please cc netdev@vger.kernel.org on networking-related matters)
You died here:
static inline void
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
Tomorrow (Monday) I want to rebase the net-2.6.24 tree one more time
to deal with all of the conflicts which exist between
linux-2.6/net-2.6 and net-2.6.24, but I'll likely defer that
until the net-2.6 fixes I
From: Rick Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:30:12 -0700
Different fields for different structures. The tcp_info struct doesn't
have the idiag_mumble, so to get the two values shown in /proc/net/tcp I
use tcpi_unacked and tcpi_sacked.
For the INET_DIAG_INFO stuff the
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
Tomorrow (Monday) I want to rebase the net-2.6.24 tree one more time
to deal with all of the conflicts which exist between
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 11:27:49AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Andy Gospodarek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This all looks fine except for one nit (well, request for extra
detail, really):
@@ -802,15 +802,20 @@ BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
ONBOOT=yes
BOOTPROTO=none
USERCTL=no
IPoIB CM handles this properly by gathering together single pages in
skbs' fragment lists.
Then can we reuse IPoIB CM code here?
Yes, if possible, refactoring things so that the rx skb allocation
code becomes common between CM and non-CM would definitely make sense.
-
To unsubscribe from
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 11:27:49AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Andy Gospodarek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This all looks fine except for one nit (well, request for extra
detail, really):
@@ -802,15 +802,20 @@ BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
ONBOOT=yes
BOOTPROTO=none
USERCTL=no
On 9/17/07, Domen Puncer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Export phy_mii_ioctl, so network drivers can use it when built
as modules too.
Domen, do you want to collect all of these changes for MPC5200 FEC in
to a single patch series? The code is getting scattered around, I'll
check it over to make sure
The IGMP enabling patch posted by me on September 2nd isn't on your list
http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/2007-September/040250.html
can you add it?
Yes, I lost that somehow. I will add it to my list of things to take
a look at (no opinion yet).
- R.
-
To unsubscribe from
I tried to look at the ipoib stuff in this series... this patch looks
fine but it doesn't actually touch ipoib, so the subject line is a bit
misleading...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Looks fine overall, with one minor nitpick:
-if (unlikely(memcmp(neigh-dgid.raw,
+if (unlikely((memcmp(neigh-dgid.raw,
skb-dst-neighbour-ha + 4,
-sizeof(union
Actually, thinking about this some more... would it be cleaner to more
the knowledge about bonding out of the ipoib driver? in other words,
export something similar to
+static int ipoib_slave_detach(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+int ret = 0;
+if (dev-flags IFF_SLAVE) {
+
John Heffner wrote:
Rick Jones wrote:
John Heffner wrote:
Any reason you're overloading tcpi_unacked and tcpi_sacked? It seems
that setting idiag_rqueue and idiag_wqueue are sufficient.
Different fields for different structures. The tcp_info struct
doesn't have the idiag_mumble, so to
On 17 Sep 2007 22:49:34 +0200 Urs Thuermann wrote:
Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please do, having the patch in mail makes it easier to review and to
comment.
OK, here it is:
Just a few more minor changes... Thanks again.
+3. Socket CAN concept
+-
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 11:27:49AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
Andy Gospodarek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This all looks fine except for one nit (well, request for extra
detail, really):
@@ -802,15 +802,20 @@ BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
ONBOOT=yes
BOOTPROTO=none
USERCTL=no
OK with me.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Overall idea looks good... one comment:
+if (n-dev-flags IFF_MASTER) {
+/* n-dev is not an IPoIB device and we have
+to take priv from elsewhere */
+neigh = *to_ipoib_neigh(n);
+if (neigh) {
+priv =
From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:16:22 -0700
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:46:38 +0530
Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kernel Bug is hit with 2.6.23-rc4-mm1 kernel on ppc64 machine.
kernel BUG at include/linux/netdevice.h:339!
(please cc
Hi Randy,
Just a few more minor changes... Thanks again.
Again, thank you. I have applied these two typo fixes, too.
urs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, thinking about this some more... would it be cleaner to more
the knowledge about bonding out of the ipoib driver? in other words,
export something similar to
+static int ipoib_slave_detach(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+
Conceptually, I see your point and I'm ok with doing it either
way. My only question is, would this change would make the ipoib module
dependent upon having the bonding module loaded (to resolve all of the
symbols)?
Yes, I guess so, if that function is in bonding. Hmm, that
From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:40:37 -0700
These two:
git://porch.greyhouse.net/gospo/tehuti-2.6.git
ipg-add-ip1000a-driver-to-kernel-tree.patch
plus boatloads of stuff in wireless.
Andrew, can you send these two to me under seperate cover? I'll
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 02:40:37PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess a lot of this could be avoided if I simply merge in whatever
external stuff you're sucking in.
plus boatloads of stuff in wireless.
I
From: John W. Linville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:18:30 -0400
I just (minutes ago) finished the mop-up of the patch mess which
had accumulated on me during my KS-related travel and the subsequent
period of catching-up. (I'm sure I still missed something or botched
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:18:30 -0400
John W. Linville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S. Andrew, I'll send you a link to a new git-wireless.patch --
I'm sure you don't want a complicated git invocation... Until then,
I don't think you should try pulling wireless-dev...
OK, thanks.
The stuff I
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
Dhaval Giani wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:51:33PM -0400, Andrew James Wade wrote:
EIP: [c037d81b] tcp_rto_min+0xb/0x15 SS:ESP 0068:c0596dec
As Vlad Yasevich mentioned, this one is already fixed in 23-rc6.
The forcedeth oops is unrelated,
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:40:37 -0700
These two:
git://porch.greyhouse.net/gospo/tehuti-2.6.git
ipg-add-ip1000a-driver-to-kernel-tree.patch
plus boatloads of
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 2:18 PM
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: net-2.6.24 plans
[...]
Andrew, I removed the troublesome IOAT patch. The only
From: Nelson, Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:57:03 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 2:18 PM
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:57:03 -0700
Nelson, Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 2:18 PM
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:53:18 -0700
The Tehuti driver you should probably pull from the above git tree.
Andy sent me a fix-it-for-net-2.6.24 patch which I'll send. It applies
on top of the git tree.
ipg-add-ip1000a-driver-to-kernel-tree.patch got
I just managed to get a 2-port Mellanox 10Gbe pci-e NIC working with
2.6.23-rc6 + my hacks. There are some errors about scheduling
while atomic and such in the management path (ie, querying stats, etc),
but the data path looks pretty good.
At 1500 MTU I was able to send + rx 2.5Gbps on both
From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:53:18 -0700
The Tehuti driver you should probably pull from the above git tree.
Ok I added in the Tehuti driver to net-2.6.24 and made sure the
napi_struct conversion was good too.
That only leaves the wireless bits :-)
-
To
From: Peter Waskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 12:12:24 -0700
This would be a good opportunity to remove the single-allocated queue struct
in netdevice (at the bottom) that we had to put in to accomodate the static
loopback. Now we can set it back to a zero element list, and
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 07:07:42 -0600
Pavel if you are going down this route. Could you look at
cleanup_net as well. The reverse walk there could probably
benefit from being list_for_each_entry_reverse.
Pavel please resubmit this work after
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
