Re: Packetlost when tc qdisc del dev eth0 root

2008-01-16 Thread Patrick McHardy
Jarek Poplawski wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 06:02:00AM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: ... This would need support from the qdiscs to do it properly. Looks non-trivial for HTB/HFSC/CBQ, but the others shouldn't be that hard. Yes. At first I've thought this would need quite a lot of work, but

Re: Packetlost when tc qdisc del dev eth0 root

2008-01-16 Thread Badalian Vyacheslav
Yes, thats one possibility (without the dummy device though please). But I wonder what this would actually be useful for. I don't think replacing the root qdisc by a different type is a common scenario, for the same type you can simply use tc qdisc change, tc class change and tc class

Re: Packetlost when tc qdisc del dev eth0 root

2008-01-16 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 09:05:47AM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: ... Yes, thats one possibility (without the dummy device though please). But I wonder what this would actually be useful for. I don't think replacing the root qdisc by a different type is a common scenario, for the same type you

Re: Packetlost when tc qdisc del dev eth0 root

2008-01-16 Thread Badalian Vyacheslav
Jarek Poplawski пишет: On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 09:05:47AM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: ... Yes, thats one possibility (without the dummy device though please). But I wonder what this would actually be useful for. I don't think replacing the root qdisc by a different type is a common

Re: [REGRESSION] 2.6.24-rc7: e1000: Detected Tx Unit Hang

2008-01-16 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, David Miller wrote: Ok, here is the patch I'll propose to fix this. The goal is to make it as simple as possible without regressing the thing we were trying to fix. Looks good to me. Tested with -rc8. Cheers, FJP -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [REGRESSION] 2.6.24-rc7: e1000: Detected Tx Unit Hang

2008-01-16 Thread Badalian Vyacheslav
applied to 2.6.24-rc7-git2 Have messages Also have regression after apply patch. System may do above 800mbs traffic before patch. After its exit polling mode? (4 CPU, 1 cpu get 100% si (process ksoftirqd/0), 3 CPU is IDLE) After patch system was go to exit polling mode at above 600mbs. Thanks.

Re: Packetlost when tc qdisc del dev eth0 root

2008-01-16 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 11:35:35AM +0300, Badalian Vyacheslav wrote: ... I simple recreate all rules. I change idea from do many add,change,delete because have many kernel panics on many kernels 2.6.x First i have panics on delete filter operation... was fix it... great.. then have panics on

[PATCH] net: NEWEMAC: Remove rgmii-interface from rgmii matching table

2008-01-16 Thread Stefan Roese
With the removal the the rgmii-interface device_type property from the dts files, the newemac driver needs an update to only rely on compatible property. Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/net/ibm_newemac/rgmii.c |1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Re: [PATCH] net: NEWEMAC: Remove rgmii-interface from rgmii matching table

2008-01-16 Thread David Gibson
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 10:37:10AM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote: With the removal the the rgmii-interface device_type property from the dts files, the newemac driver needs an update to only rely on compatible property. In fact, this patch should go in before the one changing the dts files. --

Re: SO_RCVBUF doesn't change receiver advertised window

2008-01-16 Thread Bill Fink
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Ritesh Kumar wrote: Hi, I am using linux 2.6.20 and am trying to limit the receiver window size for a TCP connection. However, it seems that auto tuning is not turning itself off even after I use the syscall rwin=65536 setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUF, rwin,

Re: [PATCH] net: NEWEMAC: Remove rgmii-interface from rgmii matching table

2008-01-16 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 10:37 +0100, Stefan Roese wrote: With the removal the the rgmii-interface device_type property from the dts files, the newemac driver needs an update to only rely on compatible property. Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese [EMAIL PROTECTED] I need to test if it works on CAB,

[PATCH] ICMP: ICMP_MIB_OUTMSGS increment duplicated

2008-01-16 Thread Wang Chen
In tree net-2.6.25, commit 96793b482540f3a26e2188eaf75cb56b7829d3e3 made a mistake. In that patch, David L added a icmp_out_count() in ip_push_pending_frames(), remove icmp_out_count() from icmp_reply(). But he forgot to remove icmp_out_count() from icmp_send() too. Since icmp_send and

Re: [REGRESSION] 2.6.24-rc7: e1000: Detected Tx Unit Hang

2008-01-16 Thread David Miller
From: Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:56:08 +0100 On Wednesday 16 January 2008, David Miller wrote: Ok, here is the patch I'll propose to fix this. The goal is to make it as simple as possible without regressing the thing we were trying to fix. Looks good to me.

[PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] fib_hash: fix duplicated route issue

2008-01-16 Thread Joonwoo Park
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9493 The fib allows making identical routes with 'ip route replace'. This patch makes the fib return -EEXIST if replacement would cause duplication. Signed-off-by: Joonwoo Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- net/ipv4/fib_hash.c |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3

[PATCH 2/2] [IPV4] fib_trie: fix duplicated route issue

2008-01-16 Thread Joonwoo Park
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9493 The fib allows making identical routes with 'ip route replace'. This patch makes the fib return -EEXIST if replacement would cause duplication. Signed-off-by: Joonwoo Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- net/ipv4/fib_trie.c |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3

RE: [PATCH 0/3] UCC TDM driver for MPC83xx platforms

2008-01-16 Thread Kalra Ashish
Hello All, I am sure that the TDM bus driver model/framework will make us put a lot more programming effort without any assurance of the code being accepted by the Linux community, especially as there are many Telephony/VoIP stack implementations in Linux such as the Sangoma WANPIPE Kernel suite

Re: [PATCH] ICMP: ICMP_MIB_OUTMSGS increment duplicated

2008-01-16 Thread Herbert Xu
Wang Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In tree net-2.6.25, commit 96793b482540f3a26e2188eaf75cb56b7829d3e3 made a mistake. In that patch, David L added a icmp_out_count() in ip_push_pending_frames(), remove icmp_out_count() from icmp_reply(). But he forgot to remove icmp_out_count() from

[PATCH] TUN/TAP GSO/partial csum support

2008-01-16 Thread Rusty Russell
OK, revised with help from Herbert. Also, I have attached a test program and a script to run it (it short-circuits two tun devices, so you can run it with the patch applied and see big packets flowing). This implements partial checksum and GSO support for tun/tap. We use the virtio_net_hdr: it

[PATCH] Interface to query tun/tap features.

2008-01-16 Thread Rusty Russell
The problem with introducing IFF_GSO_HDR is that it needs to set dev-features (to enable GSO, checksumming, etc), which is supposed to be done before register_netdevice(), ie. as part of TUNSETIFF. Unfortunately, TUNSETIFF has always just ignored flags it doesn't understand, so there's no good

Re: [REGRESSION] 2.6.24-rc7: e1000: Detected Tx Unit Hang

2008-01-16 Thread David Miller
From: Badalian Vyacheslav [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:02:28 +0300 Also have regression after apply patch. BTW, if you are using the e1000e driver then this initial patch will not work. My more recent patch posting for this problem, will. I include it again below for you:

Re: memory leakage in bridge(kernel-2.6.23.14)

2008-01-16 Thread David Miller
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:04:53 +0800 In SMP, if a bridge fdb is being created when another CPU at the same time delete the bridge, this newly created fdb may incur a leakage: netdev@vger.kernel.org (CC:'d) is the proper place to report things like this. 'linux-net' is

Re: [REGRESSION] 2.6.24-rc7: e1000: Detected Tx Unit Hang

2008-01-16 Thread David Miller
From: Badalian Vyacheslav [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:02:28 +0300 applied to 2.6.24-rc7-git2 Have messages Also have regression after apply patch. System may do above 800mbs traffic before patch. After its exit polling mode? (4 CPU, 1 cpu get 100% si (process ksoftirqd/0), 3

Re: [PATCH 4/4] bonding: Fix some RTNL taking

2008-01-16 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On 15-01-2008 07:36, Makito SHIOKAWA wrote: Fix some RTNL lock taking: * RTNL (mutex; may sleep) must not be taken under read_lock (spinlock; must be atomic). However, RTNL is taken under read_lock in bond_loadbalance_arp_mon() and bond_activebackup_arp_mon(). So change code to take RTNL

Re: [PATCH 2.6.23+] ingress classify to [nf]mark

2008-01-16 Thread jamal
On Mon, 2008-14-01 at 20:20 -0200, Dzianis Kahanovich wrote: jamal wrote: [..] Did that make sense? After current #endif - may be. I am afraid that would be counter to expected behavior. Default is meant to apply when no value has been defined. Mark of 0 for example doesnt mean default.

Re: [PATCH 3/4] bonding: Fix work rearming

2008-01-16 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:19:51PM +0900, Makito SHIOKAWA wrote: This patch is supposing a case that bond_mii_monitor() is invoked in bond_open(), and after that, 0 is set to miimon via sysfs (see same place on other monitors). Though message in bonding_store_miimon() says miimon value

Compiling as a module using the 2.6.25 git tree

2008-01-16 Thread Mark Ryden
Hello, A question about compiling as module using the 2.6.25 git tree: I had git cloned the 2.6.25 DaveM tree. I ran make menuconfig. In many cases I see in the help: To compile this code as a module, choose M here: the module will be called ... For example, in Packet Generator or in 802.1d

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fixing SA/SP dumps on netlink/af_key

2008-01-16 Thread jamal
Timo, Thanks for the effort you are putting on this. I would just speak to the concepts instead of the code - hopefully that would simulate a discussion (and shorten my email) On Sun, 2008-13-01 at 14:26 +0200, Timo Teräs wrote: Hi all, The problem with IPsec SP/SA dumping is that they

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fixing SA/SP dumps on netlink/af_key

2008-01-16 Thread Timo Teräs
jamal wrote: On Sun, 2008-13-01 at 14:26 +0200, Timo Teräs wrote: I tried to address all these problems, and added the xfrm_policy and xfrm_state structure to a new linked list that is used solely for dumping. This way the dumps can be done in O(n) and have an iterator point to them. I also

Re: [PATCH] net: NEWEMAC: Remove rgmii-interface from rgmii matching table

2008-01-16 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:53:59 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 10:37 +0100, Stefan Roese wrote: With the removal the the rgmii-interface device_type property from the dts files, the newemac driver needs an update to only rely on compatible

[patch 0/2][NETNS][DST] pass dst_ops to gc functions and add a netns pointer in it

2008-01-16 Thread Daniel Lezcano
The two following patches do trivial changes to facilitate the implementation of the network namespace in some protocols. The first one pass the dst_ops as parameter to the gc functions. The second patch just adds a netns pointer field into the dst_ops structure. -- -- To unsubscribe from this

[patch 1/2][NETNS][DST] dst: pass the dst_ops as parameter to the gc functions

2008-01-16 Thread Daniel Lezcano
The garbage collection function receive the dst_ops structure as parameter. This is useful for the next incoming patchset because it will need the dst_ops (there will be several instances) and the network namespace pointer (contained in the dst_ops). The protocols which do not take care of the

[patch 2/2][NETNS][DST] add the network namespace pointer in dst_ops

2008-01-16 Thread Daniel Lezcano
The network namespace pointer can be stored into the dst_ops structure. This is usefull when there are multiple instances of the dst_ops for a protocol. When there are no several instances, this field will be never used in the protocol. So there is no impact for the protocols which do implement

[patch] add net_device_stats support to ethtool

2008-01-16 Thread Dan Nicolaescu
Hi, I have posted this patch in the past with absolutely no reply. I would appreciate some sort of feedback of the form interested/not interested. Should I just drop it? ethtool -S only supports devices that have custom code written to print the stats. A lot of drivers use struct

Re: [PATCH] ICMP: ICMP_MIB_OUTMSGS increment duplicated

2008-01-16 Thread David Stevens
Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/16/2008 03:49:01 AM: Actually having the icmp_out_count call in ip_push_pending_frames seems inconsistent. Having it there means that we count raw socket ICMP packets too. But we don't do that for any other protocol, e.g., raw UDP packets don't get

Re: [REGRESSION] 2.6.24-rc7: e1000: Detected Tx Unit Hang

2008-01-16 Thread Robert Olsson
David Miller writes: On Wednesday 16 January 2008, David Miller wrote: Ok, here is the patch I'll propose to fix this. The goal is to make it as simple as possible without regressing the thing we were trying to fix. Looks good to me. Tested with -rc8. Thanks for

[IPV4] FIB_HASH : Avoid unecessary loop in fn_hash_dump_zone()

2008-01-16 Thread Eric Dumazet
I noticed ip route list was slower than cat /proc/net/route on a machine with a full Internet routing table (214392 entries : Special thanks to Robert ;) ) This is similar to problem reported in commit d8c9283089287341c85a0a69de32c2287a990e71 Fix is to avoid scanning the begining of fz_hash

Re: [patch] add net_device_stats support to ethtool

2008-01-16 Thread Ben Greear
Dan Nicolaescu wrote: Hi, I have posted this patch in the past with absolutely no reply. I would appreciate some sort of feedback of the form interested/not interested. Should I just drop it? I like it, but why not offer this for all devices since they all have these stats. Could add

Re: [patch] add net_device_stats support to ethtool

2008-01-16 Thread Dan Nicolaescu
Ben Greear [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dan Nicolaescu wrote: Hi, I have posted this patch in the past with absolutely no reply. I would appreciate some sort of feedback of the form interested/not interested. Should I just drop it? I like it, but why not offer

Re: [patch] add net_device_stats support to ethtool

2008-01-16 Thread Ben Greear
Dan Nicolaescu wrote: Ben Greear [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dan Nicolaescu wrote: Hi, I have posted this patch in the past with absolutely no reply. I would appreciate some sort of feedback of the form interested/not interested. Should I just drop it? I like

Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9758] New: net_device refcnt bug when NFQUEUEing bridged packets

2008-01-16 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 05:59:21 +0100 Patrick McHardy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Patrick McHardy wrote: Very nice catch, that explains quite a few bug reports about refcnt leaks. Your patch looks correct and performs the copying in the logically correct place, it would be nicer to keep this

Re: memory leakage in bridge(kernel-2.6.23.14)

2008-01-16 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:04:53 +0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In SMP, if a bridge fdb is being created when another CPU at the same time delete the bridge, this newly created fdb may incur a leakage: CPU0: static void del_nbp(struct net_bridge_port *p) { /* * CPU1 enter

Re: SO_RCVBUF doesn't change receiver advertised window

2008-01-16 Thread Ritesh Kumar
On 1/16/08, Bill Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Ritesh Kumar wrote: Hi, I am using linux 2.6.20 and am trying to limit the receiver window size for a TCP connection. However, it seems that auto tuning is not turning itself off even after I use the syscall

Re: SO_RCVBUF doesn't change receiver advertised window

2008-01-16 Thread John Heffner
Ritesh Kumar wrote: On 1/16/08, Bill Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Ritesh Kumar wrote: Hi, I am using linux 2.6.20 and am trying to limit the receiver window size for a TCP connection. However, it seems that auto tuning is not turning itself off even after I use the

Re: questions on NAPI processing latency and dropped network packets

2008-01-16 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 07:58:36AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 11:17:08AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: ... Well people are always going to operate on this model for commercial reasons. FWIW I used to work for a company that stuck to a specific version of the Linux

Please pull 'fixes-davem' branch of wireless-2.6

2008-01-16 Thread John W. Linville
Dave, One more fix for rfkill in 2.6.24...note that this branch is based on 2.6.24-rc8. Thanks, John --- Individual patches available here: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/linville/wireless-2.6/fixes-davem/ --- The following changes since commit

Please pull 'fixes-jgarzik' branch of wireless-2.6

2008-01-16 Thread John W. Linville
Jeff, A few more fixes for 2.6.24...note that this branch is based on 2.6.24-rc8. Thanks, John --- Individual patches available here: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/linville/wireless-2.6/fixes-jgarzik/ --- The following changes since commit

sctp use-uninitialized warning in net-2.6.25

2008-01-16 Thread Andrew Morton
net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c: In function 'sctp_sf_do_5_1C_ack': net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c:484: warning: 'error' may be used uninitialized in this function It is not obvious that this is a false positive. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to

Re: questions on NAPI processing latency and dropped network packets

2008-01-16 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 09:04:58PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: ... you can work with latest release provided that you always have a fallback to an earlier one. That way, you don't bet too much on something you don't completely control. If it works, it tells you you'll be able to completely

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fixing SA/SP dumps on netlink/af_key

2008-01-16 Thread Herbert Xu
jamal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are two issues that are inter-mingled in there. The most important is pf_key not being robust on dump. The other being the accurracy of IMHO doing significant work on af_key is a waste of time. It has no advantages at all over xfrm_user since neither is

Re: [PATCH] ICMP: ICMP_MIB_OUTMSGS increment duplicated

2008-01-16 Thread Herbert Xu
David Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The patch was to support the ICMPMsgStats table. Since none of certain types of output ICMP messages are generated by the kernel, but are required by the RFC, counting raw sockets is intentional (and the only way those ICMP types can be

Re: [PATCH] ICMP: ICMP_MIB_OUTMSGS increment duplicated

2008-01-16 Thread David Stevens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/16/2008 03:17:29 PM: Fair enough. How about moving this code back into icmp.c and just add a new count call in raw.c? The push pending function is used on the UDP fast path so the leaner it is the better. I started out with it there, but it certainly

Re: [PATCH] ICMP: ICMP_MIB_OUTMSGS increment duplicated

2008-01-16 Thread Wang Chen
David Stevens said the following on 2008-1-17 0:23: Wang, I think your patch is correct; did you test the same case for IPv6? I've tested IPv4, but IPv6 not yet. If Davem accept this one, I will see the IPv6, or you take care of it. -- WCN -- To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fixing SA/SP dumps on netlink/af_key

2008-01-16 Thread jamal
On Wed, 2008-16-01 at 16:28 +0200, Timo Teräs wrote: [..] Creating a separate af_key patch would not be a big problem. I was just hoping avoiding it as the xfrm_state / xfrm_policy changes modify the API and requires changing af_key also. The way dumping is done by xfrm_user is consistent

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fixing SA/SP dumps on netlink/af_key

2008-01-16 Thread jamal
On Thu, 2008-17-01 at 09:58 +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: IMHO doing significant work on af_key is a waste of time. It has no advantages at all over xfrm_user since neither is portable. So we should discourage people from using af_key wherever possible. I wouldnt disagree except some apps like

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fixing SA/SP dumps on netlink/af_key

2008-01-16 Thread Herbert Xu
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 08:39:40PM -0500, jamal wrote: I wouldnt disagree except some apps like racoon which depend on pfkey are unfortunately beyond repair. Timo has a pretty good handle on the Racoon doesn't use pfkey dumping as far as I know. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at

Re: [patch] add net_device_stats support to ethtool

2008-01-16 Thread Dan Nicolaescu
Ben Greear [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dan Nicolaescu wrote: Ben Greear [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dan Nicolaescu wrote: Hi, I have posted this patch in the past with absolutely no reply. I would appreciate some sort of feedback of the form

Re: [PATCH 3/4] bonding: Fix work rearming

2008-01-16 Thread Makito SHIOKAWA
But, since during this change from sysfs cancel_delayed_work_sync() could be probably used, and it's rather efficient with killing rearming works, it seems this check could be unnecessary yet. What going to be cancelled in bonding_store_miimon() when setting miimon to 0 is arp monitor, not mii

Re: [PATCH 4/4] bonding: Fix some RTNL taking

2008-01-16 Thread Makito SHIOKAWA
Maybe I'm wrong, but since this read_lock() is given and taken anyway, it seems this looks a bit better to me (why hold this rtnl longer than needed?): read_unlock(bond-lock); rtnl_unlock(); read_lock(bond-lock); Seems better. On the other hand,

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fixing SA/SP dumps on netlink/af_key

2008-01-16 Thread Timo Teräs
jamal wrote: On Wed, 2008-16-01 at 16:28 +0200, Timo Teräs wrote: No. I'm not creating second copies of the SADB/SPD entries. The entries are just added to one more list. Ah, sorry - yes, that sounds reasonable. So what happens if i delete an entry; does it get removed from the list?

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fixing SA/SP dumps on netlink/af_key

2008-01-16 Thread Timo Teräs
Herbert Xu wrote: jamal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are two issues that are inter-mingled in there. The most important is pf_key not being robust on dump. The other being the accurracy of IMHO doing significant work on af_key is a waste of time. It has no advantages at all over

[PATCH] request_irq() always returns -EINVAL with a NULL handler.

2008-01-16 Thread Rusty Russell
I assume that these ancient network drivers were trying to find out if an irq is available. eepro.c expecting +EBUSY was doubly wrong. I'm not sure that can_request_irq() is the right thing, but these drivers are definitely wrong. request_irq should BUG() on bad input, and these would have been

[PATCH] BUG_ON() bad input to request_irq

2008-01-16 Thread Rusty Russell
Is there any reason why these bugs should be treated gently? The caller might not want to check NR_IRQS and IRQ_NOREQUEST cases, but a NULL handler or NULL dev_id w/ shared are coding bugs. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- kernel/irq/manage.c |7 +++ 1 file changed, 3

[PATCH] e1000e Kconfig: remove ref to nonexistant docs

2008-01-16 Thread Jason Uhlenkott
There is no Documentation/networking/e1000e.txt. Signed-off-by: Jason Uhlenkott [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Index: linux/drivers/net/Kconfig === --- linux.orig/drivers/net/Kconfig 2008-01-16

RE: [REGRESSION] 2.6.24-rc7: e1000: Detected Tx Unit Hang

2008-01-16 Thread Brandeburg, Jesse
David Miller wrote: From: Brandeburg, Jesse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:53:43 -0800 The tx code has an early exit that tries to limit the amount of tx packets handled in a single poll loop and requires napi or interrupt rescheduling based on the return value from

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fixing SA/SP dumps on netlink/af_key

2008-01-16 Thread David Miller
From: Timo_Teräs [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:27:14 +0200 I don't know about netlink. But pfkey works in *BSD too and it is RFC'd. So I'd say pfkey might be a bit more portable. Though netlink is definitely more robust and extensive. The RFCs say absolutely nothing about policy

Re: [REGRESSION] 2.6.24-rc7: e1000: Detected Tx Unit Hang

2008-01-16 Thread David Miller
From: Brandeburg, Jesse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:09:47 -0800 We spent Wednesday trying to reproduce (without the patch) these issues without much luck, and have applied the patch cleanly and will continue testing it. Given the simplicity of the changes, and the community

Re: [REGRESSION] 2.6.24-rc7: e1000: Detected Tx Unit Hang

2008-01-16 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 17 January 2008, David Miller wrote: From: Brandeburg, Jesse [EMAIL PROTECTED] We spent Wednesday trying to reproduce (without the patch) these issues without much luck, and have applied the patch cleanly and will continue testing it. Given the simplicity of the changes, and

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fixing SA/SP dumps on netlink/af_key

2008-01-16 Thread Timo Teräs
David Miller wrote: From: Timo_Teräs [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:27:14 +0200 I don't know about netlink. But pfkey works in *BSD too and it is RFC'd. So I'd say pfkey might be a bit more portable. Though netlink is definitely more robust and extensive. The RFCs say

Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fixing SA/SP dumps on netlink/af_key

2008-01-16 Thread David Miller
From: Timo_Teräs [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:38:15 +0200 David Miller wrote: From: Timo_Teräs [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:27:14 +0200 I don't know about netlink. But pfkey works in *BSD too and it is RFC'd. So I'd say pfkey might be a bit more portable.