On Sat, 6 Jan 2018 10:01:54 +0100
Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 05:11:10PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Static analysis reports that 'offset' may be a user controlled value
>
> Can I see the rule that determined that? It does not feel like that is
>
On 1/6/2018 4:11 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
Static analysis reports that 'offset' may be a user controlled value
that is used as a data dependency reading from a raw_frag_vec buffer.
In order to avoid potential leaks of kernel memory values, block
speculative execution of the instruction stream
On 1/6/2018 4:11 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
Expectedly, static analysis reports that 'fd' is a user controlled value
that is used as a data dependency to read from the 'fdt->fd' array. In
order to avoid potential leaks of kernel memory values, block
speculative execution of the instruction stream
On 1/6/2018 4:11 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
Static analysis reports that 'index' may be a user controlled value that
is used as a data dependency reading 'rt' from the 'platform_label'
array. In order to avoid potential leaks of kernel memory values, block
speculative execution of the instruction
On 1/6/2018 4:11 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
Static analysis reports that 'offset' may be a user controlled value
that is used as a data dependency reading from a raw6_frag_vec buffer.
In order to avoid potential leaks of kernel memory values, block
speculative execution of the instruction stream
On 1/6/2018 4:10 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
Static analysis reports that 'trip' may be a user controlled value that
is used as a data dependency to read '*temp' from the 'd->aux_trips'
array. In order to avoid potential leaks of kernel memory values, block
speculative execution of the instruction
Hello!
On 1/6/2018 4:10 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
Static analysis reports that 'queue' may be a user controlled value that
is used as a data dependency to read from the 'ar9170_qmap' array. In
order to avoid potential leaks of kernel memory values, block
speculative execution of the instruction
On 1/6/2018 4:10 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
Static analysis reports that 'queue' may be a user controlled value that
is used as a data dependency to read from the 'priv->qos_params' array.
In order to avoid potential leaks of kernel memory values, block
speculative execution of the instruction
Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 09:07:28AM CET, j...@resnulli.us wrote:
>Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 04:57:21AM CET, dsah...@gmail.com wrote:
>>On 1/5/18 4:09 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> From: Jiri Pirko
>>>
>>> Currently the filters added to qdiscs are independent. So for example if you
>>> have
On Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 10:03:22AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 05:10:48PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Static analysis reports that 'handle' may be a user controlled value
> > that is used as a data dependency to read 'sp' from the
> > 'req->outstanding_cmds' array. In order
On Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 10:09:07AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 05:10:32PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Static analysis reports that 'index' may be a user controlled value that
> > is used as a data dependency to read 'pin' from the
> > 'selector->baSourceID' array. In order
Hello!
On 1/3/2018 11:08 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
After the Ether platform data is fixed, the driver probe() method would
still fail since the 'struct sh_eth_cpu_data' corresponding to SH771x
indicates the presence of TSU but the memory resource for it is absent.
Add the missing TSU
On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 05:10:48PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> Static analysis reports that 'handle' may be a user controlled value
> that is used as a data dependency to read 'sp' from the
> 'req->outstanding_cmds' array. In order to avoid potential leaks of
> kernel memory values, block
On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 05:11:10PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> Static analysis reports that 'offset' may be a user controlled value
Can I see the rule that determined that? It does not feel like that is
correct, given the 3+ levels deep that this function gets this value
from...
Same for the
On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 05:11:10PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> Static analysis reports that 'offset' may be a user controlled value
> that is used as a data dependency reading from a raw_frag_vec buffer.
> In order to avoid potential leaks of kernel memory values, block
> speculative execution of
Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 04:57:21AM CET, dsah...@gmail.com wrote:
>On 1/5/18 4:09 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> From: Jiri Pirko
>>
>> Currently the filters added to qdiscs are independent. So for example if you
>> have 2 netdevices and you create ingress qdisc on both and you want to
If the probing of the regulator is deferred, the memory allocated by
'mdiobus_alloc_size()' will be leaking.
It should be freed before the next call to 'sun4i_mdio_probe()' which will
reallocate it.
Fixes: 4bdcb1dd9feb ("net: Add MDIO bus driver for the Allwinner EMAC")
Signed-off-by: Christophe
101 - 117 of 117 matches
Mail list logo