> On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 13:35:47 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8338
>
>Summary: NAT of TCP connections broken
> Kernel Version: 2.6.20.7
> Status: NEW
> Severity: high
> Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:53:12 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8325
>
>Summary: -j REDIRECT --to-ports 1000-1009, always first choosen
> Kernel Version: 2.6.19-1.2911.fc6PAE 2.6.19-gentoo-r4
> Status: NEW
> Severity:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:52:49 +1000
CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 12:13:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:43:19 +1000 CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I take minute by minute snapshots of network tra
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:50:00 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jerome Borsboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH] allow VLAN interface on top of bridge interface
When a VLAN interface is created on top of a bridge interface and
netfilter is enabled to see
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 02:37:01 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8320
>
>Summary: replacing route in kernel doesn't send netlink message
> Kernel Version: 2.6.20.6
> Status: NEW
> Severity: low
> Owner:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:52:28 +0400 "Yuriy N. Shkandybin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> > (added netdev)
> >
> > On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:57:33 +0400 "Yuriy N. Shkandybin" <[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I've tested 2.6.21-rc6-mm1
> >> Linux vpn1 2.6.21-rc6-mm1 #4 SMP Wed Apr 11
(added netdev)
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:57:33 +0400 "Yuriy N. Shkandybin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I've tested 2.6.21-rc6-mm1
> Linux vpn1 2.6.21-rc6-mm1 #4 SMP Wed Apr 11 03:34:26 MSD 2007 x86_64
> Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
>
> warn appeares upon first pppoe
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:11:01 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/s390/lib/Makefile b/arch/s390/lib/Makefile
> index 7a44fed..59aea65 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/lib/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/s390/lib/Makefile
> @@ -5,6 +5,6 @@
> EXTRA_AFLAGS := -traditional
>
> lib
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:36:29 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:29:37 -0700
>
> > git-net.patch implements generic lib/div64.c, but s390 also has a
> > private one. Presumably
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:56:16 -0400
Mathieu Desnoyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The last for today : link error of 2.6.21-rc6-mm1 for s390 :
>
>
>
> /opt/crosstool/gcc-4.1.1-glibc-2.3.6/s390-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/s390-unknown-linux-gnu-ld
> -m elf_s390 -e start -o .tmp_vmlinux1 -T arch/s39
On sparc64:
drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_fdx.c: In function `ser12_open':
drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_fdx.c:417: error: `NR_IRQS' undeclared (first
use in this function)
sorry, I should have picked this up earlier, but I've be
On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 21:43:17 +0200 Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a):
> > The mm snapshot broken-out-2007-04-07-03-27.tar.gz has been uploaded to
> >
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/mm/broken-out-2007-04-07-03-27.tar.gz
> >
This looks like a locking bug in the ipv6 changes in davem's devel tree.
There are no relevant changes to drivers/net/sc92031.c in rc5-mm4.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 08:56:38 +0800
From: "Antonino A. Daplas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Andrew Morton &
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:43:19 +1000 CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I take minute by minute snapshots of network traffic by sampling
> /proc/net/dev and most of the time everything works fine. Occasionally
> though I get petabyte byte traffic and corresponding packet traffic.
How frequently?
Are
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 14:40:48 +0200
From: Stephan Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: kernel oops at ppp
Hello,
i got oops on unsing UMTS - hsdpa card merlin xu870 using ppp.
attached you can find the syslog and kernel-config
System
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: "Ilpo_J__rvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:33:28 +0300 (EEST)
>
> > If there is nothing at high_seq (application hasn't given any data to/past
> > that point), the search fails to find
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 07:39:04 -0700 "Kok, Auke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > CC [M] drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.o
> > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c: In function 'e1000_tso':
> > drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c:2968: error: dereferencing pointer to
> > incomplete type
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:33:28 +0300 (EEST) "Ilpo Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > Full -mm lineup. The x86_64 box was acting as a distcc server at the time.
> >
> > Nothing hit the logs, I'm af
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 01:06:17 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8284
>
>Summary: IPsec anti-replay window management flaw
> Kernel Version: 2.6.20.4
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Owner: [EMAIL PROTECT
Full -mm lineup. The x86_64 box was acting as a distcc server at the time.
Nothing hit the logs, I'm afraid. But almost all the info is in
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/s5000494.jpg
It died in tcp_update_scoreboard_fack() here:
if ((!IsFack(tp) || !tcp_skb_timedout(sk, sk
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:03:24 -0700
"Kok, Auke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The current davem diff is 2.2MB, touching 852 files. Nobody breathe...
>
Just for giggles:
git-net: 852 files changed, 10326 insertions(+), 27095 deletions(-)
git-netdev-all: 146 files changed, 39390 insert
On Thu Mar 29 15:50:55 PDT 2007
Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please consider pulling from my git tree:
> git-pull git://lost.foo-projects.org/~ahkok/git/netdev-2.6 mm
>
> To get a copy of my current e1000 queue. This tree consists of a recent
> 'master' branch from linus, and the fol
I have a note here that this patch needs additional work.
I forget what it was, there has since been no followup and hence I shall now
drop this patch.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://v
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 21:50:01 -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Replace system timer with work queue in monitor functions. The reason for
> this change is that bonding handlers calls various sleeping functions from
> the timer handler which is not allowed. Because we cannot share the main
> workqu
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 13:10:06 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> config CHELSIO_T3
> tristate "Chelsio Communications T3 10Gb Ethernet support"
> depends on PCI
> + select FW_LOADER
Something has gone wrong with the indenting there.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the li
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 13:10:12 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Divy Le Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Under rare conditions, the MAC might hang while generating a pause frame.
> This patch fine tunes the MAC settings to avoid the issue, allows for
> periodic MAC state check, and triggers a rec
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:23:52 +0100 Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well it causes additional problems. We had some cases where it was really
> hard to distingush garbage and the true call chain.
yes, for some reason the naive backtraces seem to have got messier and messier
over
the years
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:53:11 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> From: Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:51:37 +0100
>
> > But until then it'll unnecessarily spoil linux opinion as regards
> > stability and waste time of developers to check erro
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 07:53:57 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8151] New: Established connections not displayed in
/proc/tcp/netstat
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8151
Summary: Established connecti
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 23:41:16 +0100
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:44:08AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >...
> > Changes since 2.6.20-rc2-mm1:
> >...
> > git-netdev-all.patch
> >...
> > git trees
> >...
&g
On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:21:40 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 14:32:06 -0800
>
> > ho hum, I didn't know that, so we missed rc2-mm2.
> >
> > Could I have symlink
On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:11:40 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 02:42:28 -0800
>
> > From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Implement div64_64(): 64-bit by 64-bit division. Needed by networking (at
> > least).
>
>
ois Romieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> >
> > net/core/dev.c | 11 +--
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 17:17:09 -0800
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 05:08:49PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 19:56:25 -0500
> > Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > So the question really is
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 19:56:25 -0500
Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So the question really is are we really done making changes to sysfs,
> or maybe what we should do is talk about major version numbers to
> sysfs.
Perhaps using a config option wasn't the right way to do this - a kernel
b
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:26:30 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8132
>
>Summary: pptp server lockup in ppp_asynctty_receive()
> Kernel Version: 2.6.20
> Status: NEW
> Severity: high
> Owner: [EMAIL PROTECT
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 02:50:31 +0100 Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc2 compared to 2.6.20
> that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
We seem to have broken an unusually large amount of stuff this time.
partial post-mortem:
- The ACPICA me
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 18:25:50 -0600 Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 12:39:24AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > [adding linux-wireless to CC]
> >
> > On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 16:08 -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > Recent kernels are having troubles with wireless for me
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:43:34 -0500
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gary Zambrano wrote:
> > Added dma_sync_single_range_for_cpu/device to dma-mapping.h in asm-arm &
> > asm-avr32 to call dma_sync_single_for_cpu/device. This patch enables b44
> > to compile on systems with these cpus.
> >
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 12:11:48 +0100 Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 03:06 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > No, s390 doesn't have PCI.
>
> Ok.
>
> > s390 is weird ;) There's no way it'll support any of the hardw
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 11:38:24 +0100 Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 00:25 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > Probably related to the Kconfig problems.
>
> Yeah, it is. s390 is funny, it doesn't include drivers/Kconfig, I don'
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 10:32:32 + Richard Purdie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 00:25 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > net/mac80211/ieee80211_led.c: In function 'ieee80211_led_init':
> > net/mac80211/ieee80211_led.c:38: error: invalid application
net/mac80211/ieee80211_led.c: In function 'ieee80211_led_init':
net/mac80211/ieee80211_led.c:38: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to
incomplete type 'struct led_trigger'
net/mac80211/ieee80211_led.c:43: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
net/mac80211/ieee80211_led.c:44: warning
Not sure who to blame for all of this...
net/bluetooth/hidp/Kconfig:4:warning: 'select' used by config symbol 'BT_HIDP'
refer to undefined symbol 'HID'
net/mac80211/Kconfig:17:warning: 'select' used by config symbol 'MAC80211_LEDS'
refer to undefined symbol 'NEW_LEDS'
net/mac80211/Kconfig:18:wa
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:37:27 -0800
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:34:17 -0800
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 1 Mar 2007 11:33:05 -0800
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > >
v->header_cache_update is invoked,
> because it has an uninitialized value.
>
> Steps to reproduce:
>
> I found this suspicious spot with the help of a code-checking tool.
>
Like this?
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fix http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_
On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 12:15:14 +0800 "Wu, Bryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Here is the blackfin on-chip ethernet MAC controller driver for Linux.
>
> It's name is blackfin-driver-net-stamp537.patch
>
> [PATCH] Blackfin: on-chip ethernet MAC controller driver
>
> This patch imple
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:12:01 +0100 (CET) Jaroslav Kysela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please, review and apply to mm tree for further testing. The patch
> is also available at
> ftp://ftp.alsa-project.org/pub/kernel-patches/bonding-workqueue.patch .
Please cc netdev@vger.kernel.
ooh.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 07:10:48 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8085] New: performance drop in 2.6.20
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8085
Summary: performance drop in 2.6.20
Kernel Version:
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 07:56:27 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8057] New: slab corruption running ip6sic
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8057
Summary: slab corruption running ip6sic
Kernel Versio
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 04:20:10 -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8054
>
>Summary: tipc_ref_discard tipc_deleteport locking dependency
> Kernel Version: 2.6.21-rc1
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Owner:
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:57:59 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8053
>
>Summary: net/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt_tkip.c spams kernel
> message buffer
> Kernel Version: 2.6.20.1
> Status: NEW
> Severit
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 15:55:19 -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8042
>
>Summary: Cisco VPN Client cannot connect using TCP with Intel
> 82573L NIC
> Kernel Version: 2.6.18.6
> Status: NEW
> Severity
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 06:20:22 -0500 Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 02:45:07AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > I've recently been noticing nasty messages come out of FC5:
> >
> > sony:/home/akpm# service ipta
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 06:20:22 -0500 Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 02:45:07AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > I've recently been noticing nasty messages come out of FC5:
> >
> > sony:/home/akpm# service ipta
I've recently been noticing nasty messages come out of FC5:
sony:/home/akpm# service iptables stop
Flushing firewall rules: [ OK ]
Setting chains to policy ACCEPT: filter[ OK ]
Unloading iptables modules:[
On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 13:07:40 -0800 Sriram Chidambaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch provides the Fabric7 VIOC driver source code.
> This git mbox patch is built against
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git
>
> The patch can be pulled from
>ftp://ftp.fab
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:59:00 -0500
From: David G Hamblen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kernel mailing list
Subject: Problem with 2.6.20 and hostap_cs (Netgear MA401)
I've got the ieee80211 and hostap code compiled as modules for my MA401
card, and the system locks up w
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 02:30:59 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 8009] New: PPPoE+mppe Server fail with Win Client
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8009
Summary: PPPoE+mppe Server fail with Win Client
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:10:13 -0500 (EST) Pete Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 2.6.20-git8 fails compile:
>
> CHK include/linux/compile.h
> UPD include/linux/compile.h
> CC init/version.o
> LD init/built-in.o
> LD .tmp_vmlinux1
> net/built-in.o: In functi
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 14:49:38 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> Andrew, we're already discussing a fix for this in another
> thread today:
Yeah, I noticed. Vitimised again by those darn MUA vendors and/or
users who bust their In-Reply-To/References headers :(
-
To unsubscr
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:16:04 +0100
From: Charles-Edouard Ruault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [BUG] 2.6.20 Oopses in xfrm_audit_log
Hi All,
i upgraded to vanilla kernel 2.6.20 and while i was using strongsw
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 16:00:50 -0800 (PST)
From: "Administrative Services" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: PROBLEM: xt_state compiles without errors but cannot be loaded
[1.] module: xt_state compiles without errors but cannot be loaded
[
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:35:10 +0300 Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew, do you consider kevent for inclusion or declining?
I haven't had time to think about it in the past month or two, sorry.
However we might as well get it back in there for review-and-test - please
send a new
cond_resched() called from softirq, amongst other problems.
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 08:23:44 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7974
>
>Summary: BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0x1100/0
> Kernel Version: 2.6.20
> Status:
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 16:52:24 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 18:35:06 -0600
> Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> > > On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, Robert Hancock wrote:
> > >
> >
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 09:18:30 -0800 Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Document planned removal of sk98lin driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt |7 +++
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 12:41:07 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7962] New: oops in port_carrier_check
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7962
Summary: oops in port_carrier_check
Kernel Version: 2.6.20
On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 00:17:33 +0100
Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 00:12 +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> > > No, not this. Anyway the last patch Thomas forwarded does fix the
> > > problem.
> >
> > Which one would that be? I might try it for comparison.
>
> Find
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 13:01:55 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7952] New: slattach only works every other time
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7952
Summary: slattach only works every other time
Ke
On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 18:44:08 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I bet this rcu_read_lock()-implies-preempt_disable() assumption has
> spread into other areas of the tree as well.
Me too. Although one expects that other holes will cause might_sleep or
lockdep warnings pretty ea
On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 18:10:26 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:31:11 -0800
>
> > From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > "using smp_processor_id() in preemptible code&quo
On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 18:35:06 -0600
Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> > On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, Robert Hancock wrote:
> >
> >> Something's busted with forcedeth in 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 for me relative to
> >> 2.6.20-rc6. There's no errors in dmesg, but it seems no packets
On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 23:48:33 -0600 Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 23:13:09 -0600 Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Something's busted with forcedeth in 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 for me relati
On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 23:13:09 -0600 Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Something's busted with forcedeth in 2.6.20-rc6-mm3 for me relative to
> 2.6.20-rc6. There's no errors in dmesg, but it seems no packets ever get
> received and so the machine can't get an IP address. I tried revertin
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 03:50:56 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7909] New: malfunction of udp_get_port() in wildcard
ports assigning
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7909
Summary: malfunction of udp_g
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:29:29 +1100
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:17:44PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Jan 28 22:58:29 euridica kernel: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in
> > > preemptible [0001] code: y
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 23:31:00 +0100
Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jan 28 22:58:29 euridica kernel: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
> [0001] code: yum-updatesd/2846
> Jan 28 22:58:29 euridica kernel: caller is nf_conntrack_in+0x363/0x47f
> [nf_conntrack]
I'll plu
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 09:39:54 -0700
"Eric W. Biederman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - unquoted
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> init/main.c |3 +++
> kernel/sysctl.c |3 ---
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
drivers/net/b44.c: In function `b44_sync_dma_desc_for_cpu':
drivers/net/b44.c:144: warning: implicit declaration of function
`dma_sync_single_range_for_cpu'
several architectures appear to not implement dma_sync_single_range_for_cpu()
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe n
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 03:13:35 -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7832
>
>Summary: if i use iproute2 for network balancing
> Kernel Version: 2.6.19.1
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Owner: [EMAIL PROTECT
> On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 05:44:39 -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7817
>
>Summary: commit edfe21a29b1dca9ce5a938317868066d2e21c385 breaks
> IPv6 address autoconfiguration
> Kernel Version: 2.6.19.2
> Status: N
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:36:29 -0800
Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> git-pull git://lost.foo-projects.org/~ahkok/git/linux-2.6 e1000
That tree appears to be based on the -mm git tree?
That's a somewhat unusual thing to do - a tree which is based on current
Linus mainline would be prefer
On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:58:23 +0100
Bernhard Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've hit another kernel oops with 2.6.20-rc3 on i386 platform. It is
> reproducible, as soon as I load nf_conntrack_ipv6 and try to send
> something large (scp or so) inside an OpenVPN tunnel on my client
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 08:49:49 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7770
>
>Summary: Network connection randomly drops
> Kernel Version: 2.6.19 onward
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 11:54:26 +
From: Steve Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Subject: Intermittent SCTP multihoming breakage
Apologies if I'm posting to the wrong list - the lksctp lists seem to be a
bit dead these days and a bit of Googlin
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 19:03:34 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7757
>
>Summary: ip_conntrack:table full, dropping connection after
> kernel update
> Kernel Version: 2.6.19.1
> Status: NEW
> Severit
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 05:21:24 +0800
"Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Under 2.6.20-rc1 and 2.6.20-rc2, I get the following complaint
> for several network programs running on my system:
>
> [ 156.381868] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> net/core/sock.c:1
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 08:17:10 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7724
>
>Summary: asm/types.h should define __u64 if isoc99
> Kernel Version: 2.6.19
> Status: NEW
> Severity: blocking
> Owner: [EMAIL PROTEC
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:01:55 + (GMT)
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a change to include in
> which is needed for "struct fddi_statistics".
>
> Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> Please apply.
>
> Maciej
>
> patch-mips-2.6.18-2006
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:01:30 + (GMT)
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +/**
> + * tc_register_driver - register a new TC driver
> + * @drv: the driver structure to register
> + *
> + * Adds the driver structure to the list of registered drivers
> + * Returns a negative value on
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:01:42 + (GMT)
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is a set of changes to add TURBOchannel support to the defxx driver.
my, what a lot of rejects.
> patch-mips-2.6.18-20060920-defta-69
2.6.18?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsu
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:58:14 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7716
>
>Summary: change in behavior of OUTPUT chain reject rule in
> 2.6.19?
> Kernel Version: 2.6.19
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:56:31 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7708
>
>Summary: unregister_netdev() should return unregister_netdevice()
> return code
> Kernel Version: 2.6.19.1
> Status: NEW
> Sev
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 02:20:59 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7696] New: b44 driver doesn't work under heavy load
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7696
Summary: b44 driver doesn't work under heavy lo
t dma, void *data)
> static void smc911x_poll_controller(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> disable_irq(dev->irq);
> - smc911x_interrupt(dev->irq, dev, NULL);
> + smc911x_interrupt(dev->irq, dev);
> enable_irq(dev->irq);
> }
> #endif
That&#x
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:47:05 -0800
From: Alex Romosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 2.6.20-rc1 sky2 problems (regression?)
under heavy network load the sky2 driver (compiled in the kernel)
locks up and the only way i can get the netwo
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 07:18:20 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7665] New: getsockopt(IPV6_*CAST_HOPS) returns -1
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7665
Summary: getsockopt(IPV6_*CAST_HOPS) returns -1
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 04:50:02 +0100
Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 12:57:49PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > >> But, ok, it is not the real point to argue so much imho
> > >> and waste our time instead of
On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 18:17:06 -0200
Cesar Eduardo Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Cesar Eduardo Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This is a driver for the Silan SC92031/Rsltek 8139D NIC chip.
>
> ...
> +config SC92031
> + depends on NET_PCI && PCI && EXPERIMENTAL
> + select CRC32
501 - 600 of 1045 matches
Mail list logo
