[no subject]

2017-01-10 Thread kevin . smith
unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH net-next 7/9] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: restore VLANTable map control

2016-02-26 Thread Kevin Smith
Hi Andrew, On 02/26/2016 04:35 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:12:28PM +0000, Kevin Smith wrote: >> Hi Vivien, Andrew, >> >> On 02/26/2016 03:37 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote: >>> Here, 5 is the CPU port and 6 is a DSA port. >>> >>>

Re: [PATCH net-next 7/9] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: restore VLANTable map control

2016-02-26 Thread Kevin Smith
Hi Vivien, Andrew, On 02/26/2016 03:37 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote: > Here, 5 is the CPU port and 6 is a DSA port. > > After joining ports 0, 1, 2 in the same bridge, we end up with: > > Port 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 >0 - * * - - * * >1 * - * - - * * >2 * * - - - * *

Re: [PATCH net-next 7/9] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: restore VLANTable map control

2016-02-26 Thread Kevin Smith
Hi Vivien, On 02/26/2016 12:16 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote: > + /* allow CPU port or DSA link(s) to send frames to every port */ > + if (dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, port) || dsa_is_dsa_port(ds, port)) { > + output_ports = mask; > + } else { Is this always correct? Are there

Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix port VLAN maps

2016-01-29 Thread Kevin Smith
3456 >> ... >> 6: 1fa41f0f 4 7e 7d 7b 77 6f 5f 3f >> ... >> >> Fixes: ede8098d0fef ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: bridges do not need an FID") >> Reported-by: Kevin Smith <kevin.sm...@elecsyscorp.com> >> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> Tested-by: Kevin Smith <kevin.sm...@elecsyscorp.com>