[PATCH] Can not send icmp netunreach packet

of -ESRCH when a route is not found. Signed-off-by: Li Yewang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -Nurp net/core_back/fib_rules.c net/core/fib_rules.c --- net/core_back/fib_rules.c 2008-02-25 13:15:37.0 +0800 +++ net/core/fib_rules.c2008-02-25 13:16:01.0 +0800 @@ -188,7

[NET] Can not send icmp netunreach packet

Hi Steven There is a bug about icmp netunreach. If the kernel does not find a route for a packet, it must send a icmp netunreach packet to the source host, and discard the packet. But the latest kernel does not send a icmp netunreach packet because of the fib_lookup return

[no subject]

subscribe netdev -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [patch]IPv6: fix BUG of ndisc_send_redirect()

YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 says: It is not mandatory, however, it is better to do this. I agree. (Note: In usual, we do not install gateway'ed route with global next-hop.) Yes, but if somebody set the route with global next-hop, or some other reasons, the next-hop with global address. The

[patch]IPv6: fix BUG of ndisc_send_redirect()

ess also. signed-off-by: Li Yewang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- a/net/ipv6/ndisc.c 2007-01-13 16:59:50.050650888 +0800 +++ b/net/ipv6/ndisc.c 2007-01-13 17:02:02.362536424 +0800 @@ -1412,6 +1412,13 @@ void ndisc_send_redirect(struct sk_buff return; } + if (!

Re:[PATCH]Fix BUG of ip_rt_send_redirect()

sary, in the indentation of > new code lines that you add, not just spaces. > > Thank you. Mr David Miller I have made another patch file about the ip_rt_send_redirect(). This patch has not wrapped lines, and can be patched into the kernel. Following is my patch: signed-off-by: Li Yewa

Re:[PATCH]Fix BUG of ip_rt_send_redirect()

tokens is used. Those places need not be fixed. Following is my patch: signed-off-by: Li Yewang<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- linux-2.6.19.1/net/ipv4/route.c 2006-12-12 03:32:54.0 +0800 +++ linux-2.6.19.1/net/ipv4/route.org.c 2006-11-29 16:14:34.592058480 +0800 @@ -1327,7 +1327,8 @@ void ip_

Re:[PATCH]Fix BUG of ip_rt_send_redirect()

from route cache. Next time if we want to use this entry, the redirect entry will be created in the route cache again, and the rate_last will be initialized to 0. So we don't care of the jiffies wraparound too. Following is my patch: Signed-off-by: Li Yewang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- l

Re: [PATCH]Fix BUG of ip_rt_send_redirect()

Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think there are two problems here: 1) The first time we hit the check rate_last is zero. We should simply proceed with the redirect rather than treating this as a jiffies value. 2) When a dst is so old that the jiffies have wrapped around. I'm not sure w

[PATCH]Fix BUG of ip_rt_send_redirect()

0/24=24.9). jiffies b --|--|--|>time 0x8000+bb0x7fff+b |<--jiffies - b < 0x7fff-->| Following is my patch. Signed-off-by: Li Yewang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- linux-2.6.9/