k up, but the BMC loses its configuration).
--
| Lucas Nussbaum Assistant professor @ Univ. de Lorraine |
| lucas.nussb...@loria.fr LORIA / MADYNES |
| http://www.loria.fr/~lnussbau/+33 3 54 95 86 19 |
also break WoL, but I haven't confirmed that.
I can test patches if needed.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum Assistant professor @ Univ. de Lorraine |
| lucas.nussb...@loria.fr LORIA / MADYNES |
| http://www.loria.fr/~lnussbau/+33 3 54 95 86 19 |
On 13/09/07 at 11:05 -0700, Michael Chan wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 17:41 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > # ethtool -i eth0
> > driver: tg3
> > version: 3.65
> > firmware-version: 5703-v2.21a
> > bus-info: :02:02.0
>
> The firmware is qui
On 13/09/07 at 08:15 -0700, Michael Chan wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > This used to work, and broke between 2.6.16 and 2.6.17. Using
> > git bissect,
> > I could trace this back to that commit:
> > commit bc1c756741b065cfebf850e4164c0e2aae9d527f
> > Au
ts: Mask- 64bit+ Queue=0/3
Enable-
Thank you,
--
| Lucas NussbaumPhD student |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]LIG / Projet MESCAL |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]+33 (0)6 64 71 41 65 |
| homepage:http://www-id.imag.fr/~nussbaum/ |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the li
diately if the delay is 0, instead of waiting ?
I got similar results with tbf (frames being spaced "too well", instead
of bursting).
[1] http://www-id.imag.fr/~nussbaum/sched/netem_dequeue.diff
Thank you,
--
| Lucas NussbaumPhD student |
| [EMAIL PROTECT
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:50:41AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:06:45 +0200
> Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm interested in doing more complex stuff on inbound pack
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 08:59:56AM -0400, jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-27-07 at 10:06 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm interested in doing more complex stuff on inbound packets than what
> > is currently possible with in
eing in ingress, and re-inject packets
inside netif_receive_skb ? Does it look do-able at least ? I'm not sure
I see all the problems it implies.
I know there's a solution to my problem using IMQ or dummy, but it
doesn't look like a very clean solution.
Thank you,
--
| Lucas
