[PATCH 1/2] net: phy: intel-xway: add VR9 version number

2018-03-22 Thread Mathias Kresin
The VR9 phy ids are matching only for the SoC version 1.2. Rename the macros and change the names to take this into account. Signed-off-by: Mathias Kresin <d...@kresin.me> --- drivers/net/phy/intel-xway.c | 16 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff

[PATCH 2/2] net: phy: intel-xway: add VR9 v1.1 phy ids

2018-03-22 Thread Mathias Kresin
The phys embedded into the v1.1 of the VR9 SoC are using different phy ids. Add the phy ids to use the driver for this VR9 version as well. Signed-off-by: Mathias Kresin <d...@kresin.me> --- drivers/net/phy/intel-xway.c | 28 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)

Re: [PATCH 1/1 RFC] net/phy: Add Lantiq PHY driver

2016-05-23 Thread Mathias Kresin
2016-05-23 11:49 GMT+02:00 Alexander Stein : >> The registers are set to some reset values after the chip is coming out of >> reset, but we should set them all to the same value, Mathias said that all >> except for one board he knows are using only one LED

Re: [RFC] NET: PHY: adds driver for Lantiq PHY11G

2016-05-22 Thread Mathias Kresin
Hi Hauke, find my comments in-line. Am 22.05.2016 um 21:33 schrieb Hauke Mehrtens: Supports the Lantiq / Intel CHD 11G and 22E PHYs. These PHYs are also named PEF 7061, PEF 7071, PEF 7072 Signed-off-by: John Crispin Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens --- This

Re: [PATCH 1/1 RFC] net/phy: Add Lantiq PHY driver

2016-05-19 Thread Mathias Kresin
2016-05-19 9:03 GMT+02:00 John Crispin : > On 19/05/2016 08:57, Alexander Stein wrote: >> Thanks for the link, I wasn't aware of that patch. I like it in general, but >> there are some things I'd like to get addressed first: >> * vr9_gphy_of_reg_init() writes uncoditionally to