Re: r8169 doesn't work

Francois Romieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [...] >> Oh, thanks. I'll try. > > Excellent. That patchset works fine for me. (i386 + smp, i386 + up, x86_64 + smp) I hope to include those patches to 2.6.21. Thanks. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsu

Re: r8169 doesn't work

Francois Romieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OGAWA Hirofumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > [...] >> I have a r8169 problem, it seems RX doesn't work. To work r8169 for me >> I'm needing to revert the following th

r8169 doesn't work

Hi, I have a r8169 problem, it seems RX doesn't work. To work r8169 for me I'm needing to revert the following three commits now, but I don't know why. 9cb427b6ff0b3e235c518acf5c1fcbbfc95f0ae2 12d86f682e8acad8555718dc7b0082590f2365d0 cc9f022d97d08e4e36d38661857991fe91447d68 Any idea?

Re: [-MM GIT PULL] e1000: fixes, API rewrite, cleanups

e1000_watchdog() e1000_watchdog_task() If I'm not missing something, workqueue may be simple solution. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> e1000: introduce watchdog task From: Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An SNMP program polling the interface using ethool m