Re: [PATCH 20/21] phonet: exit_net cleanup check added

Le 5 novembre 2017 12:02:34 GMT+02:00, Vasily Averin a écrit : >Be sure that pndevs.list initialized in net_init hook was return >to initial state. > >Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin >--- > net/phonet/pn_dev.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > >diff

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] net: phonet: mark header_ops as const

ct header_ops phonet_header_ops = { > .create = pn_header_create, > .parse = pn_header_parse, > }; Acked-by: Rémi Denis-Courmont <r...@remlab.net> -- Rémi Denis-Courmont

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 7/9] net: use core MTU range checking in misc drivers

Acked-by: Rémi Denis-Courmont <courmi...@gmail.com> -- Rémi Denis-Courmont http://www.remlab.net/CV.pdf

Re: [PATCH] Make sure sockets implement splice_read

-Courmont [EMAIL PROTECTED] Applied, thank you. That's also a stable candidate, isn't it? Should go to 2.6.25-rc2, but the offending code is not in any stable release. -- Rémi Denis-Courmont http://www.remlab.net/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body

[PATCH] Make sure sockets implement splice_read

Fixes a segmentation fault when trying to splice from a non-TCP socket. Signed-off-by: Rémi Denis-Courmont [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- net/socket.c |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c index 7651de0..b6d35cd 100644 --- a/net/socket.c

Re: [PATCH] IPv6: ipv6_addr_type() doesn't know about RFC4193 addresses

)) + return (IPV6_ADDR_UNICAST | + IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_TYPE(IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_GLOBAL)); /* RFC 4193 */ But ULA's scope isn't global, shouldn't it be IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_ORGLOCAL ? Yes it is - global. -- Rémi Denis-Courmont - To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: No cmsg for SOCK_STREAM?

have to raw sockets, or better yet, BPF to do this. -- Rémi Denis-Courmont http://www.remlab.net/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH] IPv6: optionaly validate RAs on raw sockets

be missing something because I am a notoriously arrogant moron but it looks like Linux IPv6 is in a dead-end for the time being :-( What do you propose then? -- Rémi Denis-Courmont - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More

Re: [PATCH] IPv6: optionaly validate RAs on raw sockets

be anytime from now to after 10 minutes, so that's not sufficient. I wouldn't personnaly care, but... -- Rémi Denis-Courmont http://www.remlab.net/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http

[PATCH net-2.6.23 take 2] Per-datagram TTL and TOS via sendmsg()

and IPV6_TCLASS). Signed-off-by: Rémi Denis-Courmont [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff --git a/include/net/inet_sock.h b/include/net/inet_sock.h index 62daf21..7a6dc33 100644 --- a/include/net/inet_sock.h +++ b/include/net/inet_sock.h @@ -140,6 +140,8 @@ struct inet_sock { int length

[PATCH net-2.6.23 take 3] Per-datagram TTL and TOS via sendmsg()

and IPV6_TCLASS). Signed-off-by: Rémi Denis-Courmont [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff --git a/include/net/inet_sock.h b/include/net/inet_sock.h index 62daf21..7a6dc33 100644 --- a/include/net/inet_sock.h +++ b/include/net/inet_sock.h @@ -140,6 +140,8 @@ struct inet_sock { int

[PATCH net-2.6.23] Per-datagram TTL and TOS via sendmsg()

This patch adds support for specifying IPv4 Time-To-Live (IP_TTL) and/or Type-Of-Service (IP_TOS) values on a per datagram basis through sendmsg() ancilliary data. Until then, it only worked for IPv6 sockets (using IPV6_HOPLIMIT and IPV6_TCLASS). Signed-off-by: Rémi Denis-Courmont [EMAIL

[PATCH] Fix handling of IPv6 RH with 0 segments left

), +IPSTATS_MIB_INADDRERRORS); + kfree_skb(skb); + return -1; } /* -- 1.5.2.3 -- Rémi Denis-Courmont http://www.remlab.net/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [PATCH net-2.6.23 take2] UDP: Cleanup UDP encapsulation code

On Thursday 05 July 2007 20:25:50 ext James Chapman wrote: Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: By the way, couldn't encap_type be remove altogether (using two slightly different callbacks for ESP) from udp_sock? The notion of encap_type is needed for the setsockopt call so it would have to stay

Re: [PATCH net-2.6.23 take2] UDP: Cleanup UDP encapsulation code

. Looks good, thanks. By the way, couldn't encap_type be remove altogether (using two slightly different callbacks for ESP) from udp_sock? -- Rémi Denis-Courmont signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [RFD] First draft of RDNSS-in-RA support for IPv6 DNS autoconfiguration

for userland to do it properly at the moment. -- Rémi Denis-Courmont http://www.remlab.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [RFD] First draft of RDNSS-in-RA support for IPv6 DNS autoconfiguration

and process the RDNS header on RAs you receive. To reiterate: How do I authenticate SeND RA? How do I deal with the link going down before the expiration? How do I know this interface is doing autoconf at all? -- Rémi Denis-Courmont http://www.remlab.net/ signature.asc Description

Re: [RFD] First draft of RDNSS-in-RA support for IPv6 DNS autoconfiguration

is for the kernel to remember something about the last processed RA. That disqualifies raw ICMPv6 sockets. -- Rémi Denis-Courmont http://www.remlab.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [RFD] First draft of RDNSS-in-RA support for IPv6 DNS autoconfiguration

the kernel. The userspace DNS configuration daemon might need to be started later than the kernel autoconf - another issue that needs help from the kernel. -- Rémi Denis-Courmont http://www.remlab.net/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Re: Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7665] New: getsockopt(IPV6_*CAST_HOPS) returns -1

often correct, while the current behavior is always wrong, unless setsockopt() has been used first. I don't if some people may think doing a route lookup in getsockopt might be overly expensive, but at least the two other cases should be ok, particularly the last one. -- Rémi Denis-Courmont

[PATCH] Accept -1 for IPV6_TCLASS

; + if (val 0) + val = 0; break; case IPV6_RECVTCLASS: -- Rémi Denis-Courmont http://www.remlab.net/ -- VGER BF report: U 0.93636 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body of a message to [EMAIL